Hello,
I am Ms. Teresa Au, HSBC Hong Kong, head of corporate sustainability
Asia pacific region. A sum of US$23,200,000.00 Million was deposited
by our Late customer who died without declaring any next of kin before
his death in 2007.
My suggestion to you is to stand as the next of kin to
Hello,
I'd like to invite you to our upcoming free webcast on the "Top 10
Free Tools for SEO / Google Rank" being held online in the next few weeks.
Register for this no cost web event on Google / SEO -
http://www.seminar-on-seo.net/1/nov3.html?dev@openvswitch.org
Google is by far the #1 way t
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:21:56PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 04:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > I still don't understand. Why would an existing script call ovs-vsctl
> > with --may-exist as a global option? The call would not do anything
> > useful, because it would exit with a fatal e
On 11/02/2012 04:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I still don't understand. Why would an existing script call ovs-vsctl
> with --may-exist as a global option? The call would not do anything
> useful, because it would exit with a fatal error every time. Taking
> this argument to its logical conclusion,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:40:20PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 12:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> >> On 10/29/2012 11:34 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>> Until now, a command like "ovs-vsctl --may-exist add-br br0" yielded a
> >>> con
On 11/02/2012 12:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
>> On 10/29/2012 11:34 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> Until now, a command like "ovs-vsctl --may-exist add-br br0" yielded a
>>> confusing error message. Users had to realize that the correct form was
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 11:34 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Until now, a command like "ovs-vsctl --may-exist add-br br0" yielded a
> > confusing error message. Users had to realize that the correct form was
> > "ovs-vsctl -- --may-exist add-br br0", b
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Shan Wei wrote:
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void ovs_dp_process_received_packet(struct vport *p,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> int error;
> int key_len;
>
> - stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
> + stats = thi
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:53:45PM +, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:23 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > ofproto has a concept of "hidden" OpenFlow tables. Currently these are
> > used internally only for ofproto-dpif for a couple of unimportant
> > purposes. However, hidden t
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 01:18:38PM +, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > (There isn't any difference.)
> >
> > Based on a conversation in #openvswitch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
>
>
> Acked-by: Kyle Mestery
Thank you. I applied this
From: Shan Wei
no change vs v1.
Lots of drivers use this kind to read/write per-cpu variable.
stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
stats->tx_packets++;
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
Signed-off-by: Shan Wei
---
net/openvswitch/d
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:28:03PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Stepping back: I support your basic proposal, that "ovs-vsctl
> > add-port" should report a problem if the port cannot successfully be
> > added. The issue is that, so far, the appro
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Shan Wei wrote:
> >
> >> But for different field in same per-cpu variable, how to guarantee n_missed
> >> and n_hit are from same cpu?
> >> this_cpu_read(dp->stats_percpu->n_m
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> (There isn't any difference.)
>
> Based on a conversation in #openvswitch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
Acked-by: Kyle Mestery
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/li
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Stepping back: I support your basic proposal, that "ovs-vsctl
> add-port" should report a problem if the port cannot successfully be
> added. The issue is that, so far, the approaches I've seen don't fit
> well with the overall Open vSwitch desi
15 matches
Mail list logo
