Thanks, I'll push this to master and 1.4 shortly.
Ethan
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 14:46, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:42:09PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Post version 1.4.*, we are planning to change the default bond_mode
>> from balance-slb to active-backup. This commit warns
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/genetlink.inc
>> b/datapath/linux/compat/genetlink.inc
>> index bf96980..43c3227 100644
>> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/genetlink.inc
>> +++ b/datapa
And now branch-1.3.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:14:56AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Thank you. I pushed this to master and branch-1.4.
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:31:35PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > Looks good.
> >
> > I'm planning to get rid of this function entirely in the fairly near fut
Thank you. I pushed this to master and branch-1.4.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:31:35PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> I'm planning to get rid of this function entirely in the fairly near future.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 16:24, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > When a flow consis
Thanks, I added the signoffs and pushed these.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:53:25PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> You need a Signed-off-by. Otherwise looks good.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:49, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:35:14AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> I th
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:21:23PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 04:49:57PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> >> > Could we just use the existing spinlock in sw_flow plus the 'dead'
> >> >> > variable to ensure that no packet
Bonjour
Comment vous vous portez ? J'espère bien.
En fait c'est juste pour un petit dérangement que je vous contacte mais vous
voudriez m’en excuser.
J’aimerais seulement vous proposer une affaire qui pourrait vous intéresser. De
toute évidence, nous ne sommes pas de connaissances avant et
Hi,
I have observed high rates of packet loss when using OVS to "forward"
packets to a GRE or VXNET port. This packet loss does not occur to
anywhere near the same extent when OVS is used to "forward" packets to
a port that does not use tunnelling.
The attached graph loss.pdf illustrates this. It