Ah, that's a very good point. I suppose the correct thing to do would
be fall back to active-backup as you suggest. If we are going to do
that for LACP we may as well do it for the standard SLB case as well.
I think for now we should just warn as implemented in the current
version of the patch.
Hallo liebe
Komplimente des Tages!
Ich habe Ihre Kontaktdaten auf meiner privaten Suche nach einem
zuverlässigen und vertrauenswürdigen Person, ich weiß, dass diese E-Mail
werden Sie in eine gute Gesundheit zu treffen und auch surprisely aber Gott
hat seinen eigenen Weg, um Menschen zusammenzubring
How about the case where LACP fails to negotiate? Should we fall back
to active-backup if flood_vlans are configured?
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:55:29PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Personally I think it's better to just fail. This will force someone
> configuring a bond to notice the problem a
