Hi Stephan,
On 16.07.2010 08:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 07/15/10 22:10, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> today I stumbled over the following interesting (read: time-consuming)
>> problem: while caching Java objects representing individual UNO_ENUM
>> va
Hi Stephan,
On 16.07.2010 14:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 07/16/10 13:48, rony wrote:
>> On 16.07.2010 08:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> On 07/15/10 22:10, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>>> today I stumbled over the following interesting (read: time-consuming)
&g
) adds the easy to
learn,
yet powerful scripting language "Open Object Rexx (ooRexx)".
As a result it becomes possible to add and deploy macros programmed
in ooRexx from within OOo.
ooRexx:http://www.ooRexx.org
BSF4ooRexx: http://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/rexx/bsf4oorexx/current/
bundled Packages: {
}
Greatful for any further hints/suggestions!
---rony
y have been so
obvious for you and everyone else who has created Java based extensions,
but was new for me! Just applied it and it now works like a charm!
Again, kudos to you and Oliver!
---rony
P.S.: Now, in hindsight (after your expl
Buenos diaz Ariel,
On 08.08.2010 05:46, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hello Rony,
>
> On Saturday 07 August 2010, 12:21, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
>> It seems that the element in a "description.xml"
>> file can refer to multiple files that each are author
he
> rpm-packages are all the same. ;)
>
Good to know!Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known
to be 100%
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Björn,
On 16.08.2010 16:56, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:12:50 +0200
> schrieb "Rony G. Flatscher" :
>
>
>> Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100%
>> compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with th
Hi René,
On 17.08.2010 21:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled
>> over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read
>>
>
sr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/progra
The genuine OOo will have practically the same setting, except that its
directory would be pointed to:
"/opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/*".
HTH,
---rony
On
not closing OOo
> explicitly leavees an instance open.)
>
>
sorry for the noise, just found what I need: XDesktop.terminate().
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional co
Hi René,
On 23.08.2010 16:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
>> for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an
>> installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. Whe
That's how the three-layewr
> OOo interface was defined.
>
What would be the easiest way to re-install the Ubuntu-OOo after
deinstalling the genuine OOo?
(Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of
modules (with the risk that I am overlooking
ere is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup
somewhere.
Regards,
---rony
On 23.08.2010 11:42, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 21/08/2010 23:57, rony wrote:
>
>> Hi René,
>>
>> sorry that it took a while to get back, but I got totally carried away
Retrying...
On 24.08.2010 11:54, rony wrote:
> Hi René,
>
> On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>> rony, OK please try
>>
>> $ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java
>> $ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar
>>
>&
Hi René,
On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> rony, OK please try
>
> $ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java
> $ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar
>
Yup, that makes it work !
---rony
--
On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/06/10 11:37, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> After a fresh install of a German Ubuntu-desktop 10.4.1 and starting any
>> OOo module a popup error comes along informing one that OOo cannot
>> determine the user-interface lan
On 06.09.2010 16:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/06/10 12:39, rony wrote:
>> On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> On 09/06/10 11:37, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>>> After a fresh install of a German Ubuntu-desktop 10.4.1 and
>>>> starti
esting!
Approximately when would you think this infrastructure will be available
(maybe the earliest estimation) ?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
uninstalling all
Java may have left over some settings that are causing this phenomenon.)
---rony
On 06.09.2010 20:36, rony wrote:
> On 06.09.2010 16:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/10 12:39, rony wrote:
>>
>>> On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
ll make OOo available with
scripting on that particular machine (so it is more curiosity than
necessity to figure out what is happening on that Ubuntu-10.04-desktop
installation, which came without Java orginally).
Regards,
---rony
On 13.09.2010 17:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/13/10 15:
Hi Stephan,
On 14.09.2010 14:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/14/10 08:21, rony wrote:
>> The logfile (and a text-file giving information on the system) can be
>> found at:<http://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/tmp/OOo/>.
>
> One odd thing in
> <http://wi.wu.ac.at/rg
Dear Stephan,
On 15.09.2010 11:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/15/10 08:12, rony wrote:
>> administra...@flatscher:~$ ls -alF
>> /home/administrator/.openoffice.org/> hadm-ooo.txt
>>
>> insgesamt 12
>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root
>>> well I don't dare to call myself that, so let's say I'm a community
>>> contributor.
>>>
>> What you do is truly great, btw. Thanks a lot Ariel.
>>
> +1
>
++1
---rony
-
On 15.02.2011 13:31, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 02/15/11 11:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> trying to figure out the setup needs for OOo 3.3 on MacOSX, if wishing
>> to use Java from the commandline to bootstrap and work with OOo 3.3.
>
> <http://wiki.services.openoffic
;
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/program"
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app"
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link/program"
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link"
, then the cached context or the service
object are candidates for that to occur. However, on Windows and Linux
this does not happen as there are (global) references to these Java
objects which should inhibit any disposals.
TIA,
---rony
On 15.02.2011 16:27, rony wrote:
> On 15.02.2011 13:31, Ste
=$CLASSPATH:$UNO_PATH:$OOOJAVA/juh.jar:$OOOJAVA/jurt.jar:$OOOJAVA/ridl.jar
export
CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar
---rony
Hi Christian,
On 15.02.2011 22:30, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Rony, *,
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
> wrote:
>
>> in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that
>> adds ooRexx as a new macro la
Hi Alex,
On 16.02.2011 10:46, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 15/02/11 21:49, Rony G. Flatscher a écrit :
>
>
> Hi Rony,
>
>> in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that
>> adds ooRexx as a new macro language to OOo on the MacOSX.
>>
On 16.02.2011 12:21, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 16/02/11 11:57, rony a écrit :
>
> Hi Rony,
>
>
>
>>> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92926
>>>
>>>
>> *UNBELIEVABLLE !!!*
>>
>> This is just unbeli
Hi Alex,
On 16.02.2011 14:47, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 16/02/11 12:07, rony a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the links, will check them out. As it happens, the ports
> mechanism on Mac has oorexx so I have done installed it through the
> ports system.
>
Yes, but be aware that
ll systems OOo is available) to stdout (Unicode string, multiple
paths are 0-delimited). "unoinfo" is located in the same folder where
soffice is stored and got introduced with OOo 3.0 AFAICR.
---rony
-
To unsubscribe,
oblem in OOo 3.3 for MacOSX in the context of
the scripting framework if doing a "Tools -> Macro -> Run"!
Is there anything I could (try) to do ?
TIA,
---rony
On 08.04.2011 17:29, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> currently debugging a scripting language added
nctionality.
Is there anything I could do/try?
If not, should I file an issue (and if so, what level and whom to assign
to) ?
---rony
On 09.04.2011 23:02, rony wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> further debugging reveals, that indeed the error is in
>
> java.lang.System.loadLibrary(&q
Dear Stephan and Thomas,
thank you for your pointers!
On 11.04.2011 09:54, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/09/11 11:27, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> for an installation routine it is necessary to determine whether the
>> installed version of OOo is 32- or 64-bit, as this d
On 11.04.2011 13:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/11/11 12:24, rony wrote:
>> What I would be after would be to get this information at installation
>> time without any user-interaction (most won't know what would be asked)
>> in a platform independent manner.
>&
On 11.04.2011 16:16, Joachim Lingner wrote:
> On 11.04.11 15:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> On 04/11/11 14:42, rony wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.04.2011 13:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On 04/11/11 12:24, rony wrote:
>>>>> What I would be after
Hi there,
should I open an issue for this? If so, whom should I assign it to?
---rony
On 10.04.2011 13:53, rony wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> testing all kind of combinations, the following behaviour can be observed:
>
> * case 1: starting OOo via the Application folder
>
>
line does not work (using their unoinfo-output for Java) !
Instead one needs to deinstall LO, remove "~/.libreoffice" in home, get
the official LO distribution and install it, then things start to work
as was the case in the past with OOo.
Unbelievable !
---rony
P.S.: Maybe the Ubuntu
that they are not ignorants).
As for my application the workaround is simple: just install the genuine
OOo (or LO for that matter) and do not use the broken Ubuntu installation.
(Besides, the Ubuntu people broke the user interface with 11.04 bad
times, either taking
installation
package has it), breaking the office.
BTW, René, where could one download your version of the deb package to
test it?
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
Hi René,
On 07.06.2011 11:30, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> "unoinfo java" and interestingly "unoil.jar" is missing! Did a "locate
>> unoil.jar" after an "updatedb", but it is not i
,
---rony
On 06.06.2011 18:07, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:24 +0200
> rony wrote:
>
>> [... lots of hostile ranting ignored ...]
>> And by the way, if you wanted to be constructive, why did you not
>> supply a link to the place for reporting
On 07.06.2011 12:53, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
>> has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
>> seems to be (very unfor
nality. Whatever functionality the standard/reference package
possesses is what professionals should be able to rely on to be
available, if anyone else creates/distributes an OOo or LO package
(possibly with added functionality, leaving the base line, i.e.
standard/reference package, intact).
Regards,
---
rhaps some tweaking of solver settings. But the patch
> shows that replacing lp_solve is clearly a (pardon the pun) solvable
> problem.
Sounds promising, nevertheless.
:)
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
On 11.06.2011 17:55, Niklas Nebel wrote:
> On 11.06.2011 17:43, rony wrote:
>> On 11.06.2011 17:36, Niklas Nebel wrote:
>>> Dependencies on LGPL libraries may soon become a problem.
>> What would be the problem here?
>>
>> [Just curious why it was o.k. in the
Hi Ariel,
On 11.06.2011 20:26, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hello rony,
>
> On Saturday 11 June 2011, 12:43, rony wrote:
>
>> Hi Niklas,
>>
>> On 11.06.2011 17:36, Niklas Nebel wrote:
>>
>>> Dependencies on LGPL libraries may soon beco
(It is still possible to use the OOo support on Mac running the
standalone Rexx scripts via the command line, including the GUI
UNO_API_info tool.)
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask them.
---rony
--- cut here
,
---rony
On 04.09.2011 18:56, Niklas Nebel wrote:
> In case anyone is still reading these lists:
>
> I have left Oracle and started a new job, not related to
> OpenOffice.org. Because of this, I won't have enough time for any
> meaningful participation in the "new" OpenO
t; and as
such possesses the "XRefreshableInterface", which you then would neet to
query explicitly from the XEnumerationAcess object.
HTH,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*quite* some efforts to create it, but it works on all
platforms: Linux, Macs, and Windows), which may help you as well in your
efforts.
---rony
P.S.: Of course I am always interested in seeing the Smalltalk snippets
from time to time to relate to another posting of yours...
links to the relevant OOo online documentation are
helpful for your research and experiments, in order to solve your
problem. Your findings could be valuable for other readers of this list,
hence the request to report back your findings/advice.]
---rony
--
much!
> Note: The script generates a simple HTML page - no content
> directly use able as Wiki content. But feel free to change
> the script so it exports the list using the right format .-)
Is there a way to also get the file-type pattern
gt;
> elseif fprops(p).Name = "Type" then
> type_registration = fprops(p).Value
> ... use type_registration ( which is an internal type name)
> ... to retrieve it's property "Extensions" and print it out
> endif
>
> you should be abl
9=Object, 11=Boolean)
isMissing(arg1)=False, value=someObject, datatype=9
isMissing(arg2)=False, value=True, datatype=11
isMissing(arg3)=True], State=[1]
Successful run.
-- cut here --
As you can see, the Basic function gets TWO arguments, instead of only
one. The last arg
don't want to use it? If the examples are available only as NB
> projects, chances are high, that I will not only get frustrated, but that I
> will loose interest.
>
+1
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
e is a lot of resources that is being
wasted just to figure out what the original cause of an exception was,
if possible at all.]
---rony
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 03/11/09 15:12, rony wrote:
>> [Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, that the current situation is many
>> times frustrating, especially for beginners in an area of OOo (even
>> experts of one or two modules are beginners if turning to new
>>
w.r.t. its output (cannot be
redirected, nor piped). And as such whether it warrants a bug report.
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
d productive with OpenOffice.
So again, I would like to request a means to add snippets in the ooRexx
language as well.
Regards,
---rony
P.S.: Due to the fact that the scripting framework in OOo 2.0 is written
in Java, additional languages could become available for OOo if using
BSF (cf. &l
font then at:
<http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=gentium>
Regards,
---rony
rt for https. If you are using Gnome you
can use the Gnome-VFS instead. On Windows you can use the Web Folders of
the OS though this is a little bit awkward (IMHO).
Also, you might want to consider to try to use Java (practically every
PC has a JRE installed), which would probably make it even more portable.
---rony
certain class of Java applications could
not be deployed.]
3. In order to build OOo without Java are there any other flags that need to
be passed besides the --disable Java?
Sorry, have truly no idea...
:)
---rony
-
To
n its
definitions)?
Regards,
---rony
P.S.: I posted this to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> lists, because both may
be affected/interested in this.
ror in downloading). Did
repeat the download and attempt to install to no avail.
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
made me think that something was wrong with my running instance of
Firefox. So I shut it down (but had to kill the process eventually) and
restarted it and tried to install the Firefox extension, which lo and
behold has worked for me now as well !
Regards,
---rony
-
nd I'd surely like such a binding done in OO. Since I'll
>> have some free time in the next few months I'm wondering whether I
>> could help in such a project.
Again, if JRuby is an option and you are interested in making
nsion.
Thankful again for any hints...
---rony
ram/classes/bsf-rexx-engine.jar ../../../../../program/
classes/oorexx-uno.jar
Not looking nice, but serving its purpose (it works). But again: would
the depth of the cached package directory remain and be the same on Linux?
Or do you think that packaging everything into one jar-file would be best
- scripts), could glimpse over it already a bit and
saw that link libraries can be bundled for different platforms.
Also it seems, that deploying the extension will become really easy for
the user, including updating the extension!
Again, thank you very much!
Regards,
---rony
-
rn and to know your Eclipse
plugin and what it can do to help free up development and maintenance time!
:)
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Andrzej,
>> Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>> i would also go forward with JRuby first, based on top of the scripting
>> framework and the Java UNO binding. One thing you have to do is to
>> provide an appropriate script provider.
>>
> That's already done - t
ppropriate "manifest:media-type"
entry?
o Of course this may pose a little problem when using the
update feature, as such scripts could have been edited in
the meantime by the users (but then one could resolve this
by moving the existing/edited extension scripts to an own
backup library)
TIA,
---rony
e a means available to tell
the package manager where to copy these files in the standard OOo
installation tree in a platform independent manner)?
Regards,
---rony
predefined form.
Finally, being able to package and deploy scripts in any scripting
language that can be used for OOo would be important as well.
Regards,
---rony
ager) does not run.
---
Maybe someone could hint what the problem might be?
Also, is there an official OOo distribution for Debian/Ubuntu (expecting
not to run into such problems with it)? Or is there another possibility
to install the official OOo distribution on Ubuntu/Debian?
TIA,
---rony
P.
ld get the Java program to run from the command line, ie.
bootstrapping OOo worked!
[However, the Extension manager on the tools menu does not work either
in this version; it does from the commandline, though, ie. "unopkg"
works there.]
Again, thank you *very* much for your kind and exact
stall the "genuine" OOo from the OOo homepage
(kudos to him) !
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the
commandline using Java ? Could that really be the case?? Or is there
something that I might still oversee, which is important for the Ubuntu
version but not for the genuine OOo distribution?
Regards,
---rony
-
To
whether you are able to compile and run
the enclosed Java program from the *command* line (not NetBeans, Eclipse
etc.) under Ubuntu's OOo? If so, I would be *very* interested in your
environment settings!
TIA,
---rony
CreateTextDocument.java
Description: java/
gt; and setting up environment variables and so on
The challenge at the moment for me is to find out what environment
setting is necessary to drive OOo via Java from the commandline (i.e.
becoming able to bootstrap OOo and then control it from Java).
would like to learn what is needed for an "out-of-the-box" Ubuntu
OOo installation to be employed to run Java apps from the command line.
(Here SDK/NetBeans/Eclipse setups can come into ones way as it is then
not always clear which environment is in effect under which circumstances.)
TI
ry
thankful, if you could share the environment setting of that command
line window.
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH (from the
test machine)?
TIA,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the script and makes the
arguments available to it;
* the Rexx interpreter executes the script which itself calls
UNO.CLS (specific UNO/OOO support, which itself uses
UNO_XINTERFACES.REX), which calls BSF.CLS (bridge to Java); all
these scripts are plain text files and are found in their location
(OOHome/program).
Regards,
---rony
nd activated. Will look into this once more to make sure
that my scripts did not alter the standard installation.
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;s time (off-line) to look into this further to be
sure that it is really them.
It seems however that "ashok_" somehow is able to run the test program
from a jar (but am not sure why and how yet).
Regards,
---rony
--
matches Jürgen's explanations.
However, *where* would one find the "com.sun.star.lib.loader." package?
(Just did a grep over "OOHome/program/classes", but none of those
deployed jar would contain a class by that
r words, distribute that jar as you distribute the juh.jar etc.
---
And being there, why not fold juh.jar, etc. into *one* jar only?
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
just a stupid question: why doesn't the Bootstrap helper class use the
"com.sun.star.lib.loader." knowing the important role of that library to
find the OO executable ?
Regards,
---rony
>>> However, *where* would one find the "com.sun.star.lib.loader.&qu
ins the extension manager.
>
> The Extension Manager Dialog is contained in a service. This service
> is used when starting the Etension Manager from the Tools menu or when
> runngin unopkg gui. You mentioned that unopkg works, does that mean
> unopkg add
Hi there,
sorry, was off for a week witohut access to e-mail, hence my late answer
(keeping the quotings so only this e-mail is needed).
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> Hi Stephan,
>>
>>>> , in the case of the ooRexx scripting engine:
>>
list" yields the same error it seems, whereas
"./unopkg list --shared" works. Again, if it helps to create anothe
strace for the failing version, please advise.
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o, does an ls -l on that log.txt file show any
> anomalies?)
Ad "ls -l log.txt": just noticed that the owner and group is "root"! So
here is the entire listing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.openoffice.org2/user/uno_packages/cache$ ls -al
insgesamt 32
drwxr-xr-x 4 rony ro
ater). [Will look into the version of "alien" that I
have used as the docs indicate (so it seems) that the bug should have
been removed after v8.50.]
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
the single-tree'd version that can be
downloaded from OOo's home, as this would imply that in reality there
was no freedom to adapt the OOo installation tree according to the rules
of the host system.
Thankful for any ideas/hints/help!
---rony
mpiler (javac
CreateTextDocument.java) and run the compiled class with "java
CreateTextDocument".
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on of "com.sun.star.uno.Type" is not totally clear for
me, therefore I would like to discuss this, before really going out and
filing an issue (possibly wrongly).
Any comments/hints/insights?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing.
Thank you very much for this clarification!
>> The documentation of "com.sun.star.uno.Type" is not totally clear for
>> me, therefore I would like to discuss this, before really going out and
>> filing an issue (po
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo