On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:28:24PM +0200, rony wrote:
> It is almost crazy, because quite a few projects rely on unoinfo
> supplying the correct CLASSPATH definition for interacting with OOo/LO
> (the sequence matters), which then simply won't work with the Ubuntu
> distros.
And where should this
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:56:35AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name "unoinfo*"
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
> rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
>
> in Debian, is that what you mean?
Good that this script isn't docum
Hi René,
On 07.06.2011 09:56, Rene Engelhard wrote:
... cut ...
> rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name "unoinfo*"
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
> rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo
>
> in Debian, is that what you mean?
>
> If yes, then it's interesting why
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote:
> "unoinfo java" and interestingly "unoil.jar" is missing! Did a "locate
> unoil.jar" after an "updatedb", but it is not installed. So this is
Obviously totally untrue. I don't think Ubuntu removed unoil.jar, that
would break everything Java-is
Hi René,
On 07.06.2011 11:30, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> "unoinfo java" and interestingly "unoil.jar" is missing! Did a "locate
>> unoil.jar" after an "updatedb", but it is not installed. So this is
>>
> Obviously totally untrue. I do
Am 06.06.2011 17:27, schrieb Michael Stahl:
On 06.06.11 16:35, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
Has anyone tried refactoring OUString?
- It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not
necessary.
- It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their equivalents.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:24 +0200
rony wrote:
> [... lots of hostile ranting ignored ...]
> And by the way, if you wanted to be constructive, why did you not
> supply a link to the place for reporting it? If it was easy to find
> such a place, I would have reported it
https://launchpad.net/ubunt
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:01:22 +0200
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Good that this script isn't documented at all and has no help and you
> need to read the code, but it even works:
Well, digging deep into the source history one finds:
http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88687#c14
However, u
hello,
I am a undergraduate student of third year (INDIAN INSTITTE OF
TECHNOLOGY-IIT) and wants to develop new functionality in open office.before
trying on the features of to do list , i want to add small
functionality.However i am not clear how to start and how to proceed
further.Also i started r
Hi Bjoern,
just saw your e-mail appear now in the list, hence the late answer.
Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :(
Regards,
---ro
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +0200, rony wrote:
>This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla
>installation, after having gone further:
>
> * Ubuntu 11.04 does *not* install any of the Java classes in
>"/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis-link/program/classe
hi shashanka sharma
first try with the examples in the developer guide to perform some basic
things something like add a string to the writer doc if you are willing to
work with writer. With that try to familiar with the java api.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Shashank Sharma wrote:
> hello,
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote:
> Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
> has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
> seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :(
There IS NOTHING CRIPPELD. Just
Hi there ,
Developers guide was the best resource I had when I was in the same
situation like you !
Anyway I have written a small blog post about how to get started on plugin
developement based on my experience.
link:http://srilankatechnology.blogspot.com/2010_11_01_archive.html
This contains a b
Hi,
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:28:18 +0200
rony wrote:
> This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla
> installation
Which does not include a full libreoffice installation, as this is
unfortunately impossible to fit on the install CD along with the rest
of the desktop(*). However,
On 06.06.2011 19:43, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
And also, please cover the underlying memory allocation mechanism which
would be another key factor for the performance improvement.
On 2011/06/07 3:04, Niklas Nebel wrote:
There's an old suggestion to treat small strings differently, see
h
On 07.06.2011 12:53, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
>> has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
>> seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:52:41PM +0200, rony wrote:
> If packages deviate from the reference packages (OOo or LO), they get
> > crippled, like it or not.
Nonsense. They just ha a bit other structure, the functionality is supposed
to be there. Just install the one package you miss.
Hi René,
On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite
>>
> You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. "You cripple XYZ". When
> we don't. (And you say we do that intentionally, which is also a insult)
>
O.K., I take
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Shashank Sharma mailto:shashan...@iitrpr.ac.in>> wrote:
>
> hello,
> I am a undergraduate student of third year (INDIAN INSTITTE OF
TECHNOLOGY-IIT) and wants to develop new functionality in open office.before
trying on the features of to do list , i want
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:28:53PM +0200, rony wrote:
> On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >> Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite
> >>
> > You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. "You cripple XYZ". When
> > we don't. (And you say we do tha
On 07.06.2011 13:15, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
As many already know, malloc() is too general and too expensive.
Moreover, free() is much more expensive than malloc().
e.g. a source code of malloc() in glibc:
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=malloc/malloc.c
We use our own im
On 07.06.2011 17:22, Niklas Nebel wrote:
On 07.06.2011 13:15, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
As many already know, malloc() is too general and too expensive.
Moreover, free() is much more expensive than malloc().
e.g. a source code of malloc() in glibc:
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=
23 matches
Mail list logo
