[dev] conulta open office

2011-06-06 Thread Yesi Idaberry
hola no se si este es el medio para realizar consultas pero no encontre otro. tengo un problema que no puedo solucionar : me aparece el siguiente mensaje cuando quiero abrir un archivo del tipo hoja de calculo de open office "la operacion solicitada requiere elevacion" por que podria ser? el pr

[dev] Re: conulta open office

2011-06-06 Thread Alexandro Colorado
2011/6/6 Yesi Idaberry > hola no se si este es el medio para realizar consultas pero no encontre > otro. tengo un problema que no puedo solucionar : me aparece el siguiente > mensaje cuando quiero abrir un archivo del tipo hoja de calculo de open > office "la operacion solicitada requiere elevac

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-06 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi rony, On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:55:44 +0200 rony wrote: > totally off the records for this list, indeed. > but maybe nevertheless > interesting/amusing: Ubuntu 11.04 replaced OOo with LibreOffice (LO). thats true. > Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with their OOo > install

[dev] refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
Has anyone tried refactoring OUString? - It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not necessary. - It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their equivalents. - It prevents debugging efforts because of sal_Unicode buffer[1]. - It mixtures different purposes

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Stahl
On 06.06.11 16:35, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: > Has anyone tried refactoring OUString? > > - It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not > necessary. > - It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their equivalents. > - It prevents debugging efforts be

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-06 Thread rony
Hi Bjoern, On 06.06.2011 12:42, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with their OOo >> installation in the past with the effect that using the Java interface from >> the command line does not work (using their unoinfo-output for Java) ! >> > That ha

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
On 2011/06/07 0:27, Michael Stahl wrote: > refactoring OUString has to be done carefully because it is a central part > of the URE API/ABI and those must be compatible. > > a number of people here have come to the conclusion that it would be an > improvement to use ::rtl::OString with UTF8 encodin

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 06.06.2011 18:57, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: On 2011/06/07 0:27, Michael Stahl wrote: > refactoring OUString has to be done carefully because it is a central part > of the URE API/ABI and those must be compatible. > > a number of people here have come to the conclusion that it would b

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
On 06.06.2011 18:57, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: This is just an idea. How about adding a new class besides OUString? On 2011/06/07 2:16, Mathias Bauer wrote: We already have enough string classes. :-) Yes, we have! :-) Besides that, you are right, rtl::OUString is stupid. We planned t

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 06.06.2011 19:43, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: And also, please cover the underlying memory allocation mechanism which would be another key factor for the performance improvement. There's an old suggestion to treat small strings differently, see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/U