On 06/08/15 08:17, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> Thanks Dennis for doing that, great job. I agree we should look deeper into
> what happened in 2015 only.
>
> Roberto
>
> 2015-08-06 4:56 GMT+02:00 Dennis E. Hamilton :
>
>> In looking for visible indicators of project activity, I created an
>> overv
On 07/08/15 09:50, Michal Hriň wrote:
> Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version
> is
> made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make
> a
> release candidate or started voting on a release candidate.
>
> Is this coordinated with the release ma
[X] +1, Dennis Hamilton as new Chair
On 16/08/15 08:57, jan i wrote:
> This is a call for a formal vote among the 1 candidate for the AOO Chair
> role.
>
> Due to the fact that there are only 1 candidate we could use lazy
> consensus, but since
> some persons might be against that, we will use m
On 28/09/15 11:07, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> $ svn diff -c1705196 sal/inc/osl/file.h
>> Index: sal/inc/osl/file.h
>> ===
>> --- sal/inc/osl/file.h(revision 1705195)
>> +++ sal/inc/osl/file.h(revision 1705196)
>> @@ -132,6 +132
On 21/10/15 09:55, Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/21/2015 02:25 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
>> I recently started a download of all of the AOO 4.1.2 rc2 candidates,
>> then see how long it was going to take and let it run overnight. In
>> the morning, the download had failed to get them all.
>>
>> What
On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
> [x] 0 Abstain
>
> It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
> delivered source on Windows 7 is a problem in my build environment or a
> bug in the source.
Regina I don't know why it doesn't build on your machine but I
successfully
On 23/10/15 13:50, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it is
> now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2.
>
> Source and binary packages for RC3 are available at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> and the refere
On 25/10/15 11:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Damjan reported an interesting finding a few hours ago: the source
> package of OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC3 contains two extra files (which are not
> in SVN) in "main/": MacOSXX64Env.Set and MacOSXX64Env.Set.sh.
>
> I've done a quick check and:
> - The issue al
On 26/10/15 12:17, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>> On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> [x] 0 Abstain
>>>
>>> It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
>>> delivered source on
On 26/10/15 15:05, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 26/10/15 12:17, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> Hi Jürgen,
>>
>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>> On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>>> [x] 0 Abstain
>>>>
>>>> It is still not clear,
On 27/10/15 17:45, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>
>> checked the build in the morning and en-US built was successful. Besides
>> the fact that we have some issues on newer Linux distros (we ever had)
>> the src package is fin
On 27/10/15 23:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I was wondering whether we should remember Ian Lynch at the end of the
> 4.1.2 Release announcement, with a sentence like
>
> "The OpenOffice community dedicates version 4.1.2 to the memory of Ian
> Lynch, a member of the OpenOffice Project Management Co
On 28/10/15 09:41, JZA wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> wrote:
>
>> On 27/10/15 23:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> I was wondering whether we should remember Ian Lynch at the end of the
>>> 4.1.2 Release announcement, with a sent
On 03/11/15 10:02, FR web forum wrote:
>> Possible cross problem with mailmerge function.
> Issue reported: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126623
> Maybe Mac users could be confirm or not?
>
I can confirm that there is a problem, an existing DB file can be opened
but the existing table
On 06/11/15 18:34, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> The same symptoms Juergen reports are also attributable to the absence of a
> Java Runtime Environment (JRE) that AOO can use. That is, one can create a
> new empty database .odb, but cannot open it, etc.
>
> That there are crashes without any repo
I also heard about it and it's very sad to hear this. John was indeed a
huge enrichment for the community ans he was a very pleasant person. I
met him several times and worked with him in the community council in
the former pre Apache era of OepnOffice.
Juergen
On 18/01/16 15:58, Simon Phipps wr
On 4/15/14 4:14 PM, imacat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014/04/14 16:21, Jürgen Schmidt said:
>> the RC3 build (rev. 1586584) is uploading and most of the files
>> are already available. Only 32 bit language packs for Linux are
>> currently missing.
>>
>> I pla
On 4/16/14 3:28 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/15/14 4:14 PM, imacat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2014/04/14 16:21, Jürgen Schmidt said:
>>> the RC3 build (rev. 1586584) is uploading and most of the files
>>> are already available. Only 32 bit language pa
Hi,
we are currently in the unlucky situation that the server where the RC
builds are uploaded and hosted is not available due to hardware issues.
New replacement disks are ordered and expected to be available on
Friday. Maybe later on Friday or Saturday the server will be back.
I have deleted th
On 4/17/14 9:50 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:40:25 +0200
> Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 17. April 2014 um 01:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
It seems rather serious. I expect that "ordinary" private users are
not affected so muc
Hi,
we currently have an issue with digital signing on non Windows
platforms. The whole problem was introduced with the drop of some very
old Mozilla stuff that made always problems.
Feature description (simplified)
Digital signing of document and/or macros is a feature to increase the
integrity
On 4/17/14 9:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are currently in the unlucky situation that the server where the RC
> builds are uploaded and hosted is not available due to hardware issues.
> New replacement disks are ordered and expected to be available on
> Friday. May
of uploading the RC4 when the server is back again
(hope I will notice this in my vacation ;-)).
Please test this feature with the upcoming RC4 and for some detail
information please review issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124701
Juergen
>
> Herbert
>
> On 17.
Hi,
I would like to propose a new RC3 based on revision 1587478 of our
AOO410 release branch.
Integrated fixe for
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124682
The latest reported problems with digital signatures can be solved with
setting an additional environment variable on non windows
short update, the builds are still not uploaded due to server problems.
Today is the first time that I get access on the server.
I will keep you informed
Juergen
On 4/17/14 4:59 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new RC3 based on revision 1587478 of our
revision 1589052 instead of 1587478.
Juergen
On 4/22/14 9:25 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> short update, the builds are still not uploaded due to server problems.
> Today is the first time that I get access on the server.
>
> I will keep you informed
>
> Juergen
>
Hi,
our infra friends working hard to bring the server back. To get an
overview about the active build bots and to get a clean fresh start
after the crash I recommend to delete all the related directories and
let them re-create when the bots finished with new results.
So in case you are running i
On 4/22/14 4:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> CMS appears to be back up.
>
> Blog is down.
>
> Just got a report that downloads were timing out. Appears to be on SF side.
>
> How are the buildbots?
http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
it seems to be ok on the monitoring page but I am not sure if they
n
>
> On 4/22/14, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 04/22/2014 09:33 PM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>>>> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
>>>
>>>> http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
>>>>
>>>> it seems to be ok on the m
On 4/23/14 9:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> When someone complained that OpenOffice crashed on their company
> documents, I've always answered that either they made the documents
> available in Bugzilla or we couldn't do anything about it. Now it
> happened to me and I realize that my suggestion i
On 4/25/14 1:09 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.1.0_release_blocker:
> Issue 124741: Slide will be inserted in wrong place when try to insert it in
> latter slides(with vertical scrollbar)
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124741
I have denied th
Hi,
the RC4 build (rev. 1589052) is available. The wiki [1] page is not
updated yet because I get always a proxy error ... Please pick up the
files directly from
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.0-rc4
The wiki will be updated asap but nevertheless will I start the vote
toda
On 4/25/14 4:12 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
CMS appears to be back up.
>>>
>>> I assume this is still down? I'm able to check in f
On 4/25/14 4:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On 4/25/14 4:12 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>
On 4/25/14 3:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the RC4 build (rev. 1589052) is available. The wiki [1] page is not
> updated yet because I get always a proxy error ... Please pick up the
> files directly from
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.0-rc4
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
(RC4) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the
iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A
On 4/28/14 12:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> while enjoying the Easter time I made some progress about a long-term
>> problem:
>>
>> - Downloading the offered file via the green box is fast and easy
>> - Downloading a different
Hi,
assuming the vote for AOO 4.1 will pass successful today we should be
prepared to have the final release bits in place.
Pre release
1. upload the files to SF (I will take care of it)
2. prepare announcement email (I will take care of it)
3. update the download mechanism
4. wait until the offi
On 4/28/14 3:37 PM, Mathias Röllig wrote:
>> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
>> (RC4) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>
> +1
>
> It is a very short time vote, but I didn't found any reason against the
> release.
it is a little longer (few hours) than the normal 7
On 4/28/14 5:04 PM, Mathias Röllig wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Today I want to download RC4 for MacOS (seems all languages). Click onto
> the entry for the download let Firefox load it into itself as "plain
> text" instead of showing a "Save to"-box. This occurs with Firefox on
> MacOS and also on Ubuntu.
On 4/28/14 5:16 PM, Mathias Röllig wrote:
>>> It is a very short time vote, but I didn't found any reason against the
>>> release.
>>
>> it is a little longer (few hours) than the normal 72 hours vote.
>>
>> The changes are limited compared to earlier RC's. What are you expecting
>> to find what yo
+1 from me.
I did my standard testing on 3 platforms, build the src release and
think it will be a very solid and good version. I used a snapshot build
(later the Beta, RC's) since weeks for my daily work ...
Juergen
On 4/25/14 5:11 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this
Kim
+1 Pedro Giffuni
+1 Andrew Rist (binding)
+1 Tal Daniel
On 4/25/14 5:11 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC4) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bug
On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria
>> (currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do not drop it
>> afterwards for the other minor releases.
>>
>> [...] I would remove u
On 4/29/14 10:10 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote:
> Hello Jürgen!
>
>> 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot
>> closed successful to release the RC as AOO 4.1 Beta.
> .
>
> Sure?
of course not, I read it so many times
Hi,
our release notes are under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Notes
but the download page generates a link based on the complete version
4.1.0, means
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.0+Release+Notes
What is the best way to chang
On 4/29/14 11:23 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our release notes are under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Notes
>
> but the download page generates a link based on the complete version
> 4.1.0, means
>
> https://cwiki.ap
On 4/29/14 12:18 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 29/04/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> our release notes are under
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Notes
>>>
>>> but the download page generates a link based on the comp
On 4/29/14 2:56 PM, Jürgen Lange wrote:
> Hello Oliver,
>
> restarted the Download a second time and now installing is working. For
> 3 downloads I've had three different file sizes (161089, 161092 ans
> 161097). Strange.
it's probably a good idea to check the md5 or any other checksum file to
ve
On 4/29/14 3:32 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> on Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:01 PM Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Jörg Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just adjusted the German Home page, so far only in the staging
>>> area: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/de/index.ht
On 4/29/14 4:35 PM, FR web forum wrote:
> Hello,
>> it's probably a good idea to check the md5 or any other checksum file to
>> verify the download
> To this purpose, the url http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/
> jump to outdated text files.
> Where are we find this info?
I have never re
On 4/30/14 12:28 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 04/29/2014 07:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>> Am 04/29/2014 09:47 AM, schrieb jan i:
>>>
>>>> On 29 April 2014 09:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
&g
Hi,
I noticed that the Linux 64 bit language packs are missing in the AOO
4.1 release. I am currently pushing them on dist and SF to be available
later.
I am wondering why nobody have noticed this before. Because of a typo in
my scripts they were not available in the RC builds as well and nobody
Hi,
I have uploaded kid language packs for AOO 4.1.0 under
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/releases/4.1.0/kid_langpack/
I hope you can use them to improve the translation where necessary or to
identify easier where the string have to be searched in Pootle.
Juergen
Hi,
removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
Any opinions?
Juergen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For addit
On 2/28/14 9:06 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 2/27/14 11:53 PM, Samer Mansour wrote:
>> I'm tweaking the source SVGs so that the pixels in lines aren't between two
>> pixels and look blurry.
>> Once the SVGs are done its only a few minutes to generate the differen
On 4/29/14 10:56 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Fixed as of r1591100, thanks!.
>
> Sorry, I knew some of this could happen.
>
> Unfortunately AOO is broken with FreeBSD 10+ (clang/libc++ has bridge
> issues) so
> my testing was limited. It also means I won't be doing much AOO in a while.
mmh, I don'
Hi,
for AOO 3.4 we had already discussed and later on reverted a change to
enable the ODF Document encryption AES-256 by default.
Some time ago I played with a new option field to allow the user to
enable this option as new default, see [1]
By default the office still uses the old blowfish algor
On 4/30/14 1:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> A User on en-Forum has posted this:
>
> After receiving notification of the availability of Open Office 4.1.0, in
> which it was stated that the update was suitable for Mac OS X 10.3 onwards, I
> downloaded the relevant file … noting that i
On 4/30/14 10:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for AOO 3.4 we had already discussed and later on reverted a change to
> enable the ODF Document encryption AES-256 by default.
>
> Some time ago I played with a new option field to allow the user to
> enable this option a
On 4/30/14 8:19 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 30/04/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 04/30/2014 09:33 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>>> removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
>>> we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
>
On 5/6/14 12:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for AOO 3.4 we had already discussed and later on reverted a change to
>> enable the ODF Document encryption AES-256 by default.
>>
>> Some ti
On 30/04/14 09:51, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 2/28/14 9:06 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 2/27/14 11:53 PM, Samer Mansour wrote:
>>> I'm tweaking the source SVGs so that the pixels in lines aren't between two
>>> pixels and look blurry.
>>> On
On 14/05/14 21:10, Mathias Röllig wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Please have a look into issue 124837. Because of the content of the
> attached file it should be deleted immediately.
we can of course delete this file but the request should come from the
person who added the file.
A short note in the file w
Hi,
I am currently investigating in Google's C++ test framework [1] which
seems to be quite powerful and a good replacement for cppunit which has
not the proper license.
My idea is to use gtest as general C++ unit testing framework in our
build environment and replace long term all cppunit based
Hi Brennan,
first of all sorry for the late response, we had a mail outage at Apache
and mails are coming in with a huge delay. But anyway thanks for sharing
your experience with us and proposing some good ideas how to improve
this. There is indeed a lot of room for improvements.
Your described p
On 17/05/14 13:27, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 15/05/2014 Steele, Raymond wrote:
>> I compiled OpenOffice and extracted the archive located at
>> main/instsetoo_native/unxsoli4.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/install/en-US/
>>
>> top my /opt directory. However, it appears that during runtime of the
On 19/05/14 09:06, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 16.05.2014 11:10, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>> On 15.05.2014 07:54, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:42:12AM +, build...@apache.org wrote:
Hi! , The openoffice-linux64-nightly builder has just completed a run
STAT
On 18/05/14 23:04, Guy Waterval wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> 2014-05-18 22:17 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) :
>
>> Am 05/18/2014 09:40 PM, schrieb Max Merbald:
>>
>> I think it's a very good idea that ideas for AOO Next can be collected
>>> here. I have a few myself. One is that the user interface has not b
On 20/05/14 00:59, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 05/17/2014 04:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 17/05/2014 Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Anybody can propose things and we can discuss it. ...
>>> nobody should expect that others do the work.
>>
>> This is an excellent summary indeed. On one hand we can
revious versions. Is this by design?
>
I haven't compiled Solaris for a long time but I assume that we still
have support for pkg.
Juergen
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:41 AM
> To: dev@openo
On 19/05/14 20:58, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 05/19/2014 09:11 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>> This weekend just a little update as I was not able to do more work
>>> (healthy problem):
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html
>>
>> It's nice! I
On 20/05/14 17:51, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:04:04 +0200
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 20/05/14 00:59, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/17/2014 04:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>> On 17/05/2014 Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>
On 23/05/14 22:23, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 05/20/2014 09:55 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>> Am 05/20/2014 09:27 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>>> On 19/05/14 20:58, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>> Am 05/19/2014 09:11 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>>>> Marcus (
On 26/05/14 11:52, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: FR web forum [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
>
>> Subject: Re: [Lazy Consensus] link to a german forum
>>
>> Just one question: why not embed this forum in
>> forum.openoffice.org/de?
>> de.openoffice.info run with PhpBB 3.
On 26/05/14 16:34, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We all could see that met my suggestion to the resistance of three community
> members (thank you to Andrea, Jürgen and Mathias For their opinions), so I'm
> _not_ going to implement my proposal.
>
well I expressed my opinion only, I am
On 26/05/14 20:13, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> I think we have some misunderstanding here.
>
> It's an essential that information should be consistent at any place for
> Bugzilla.
>
> Here an overview concerning priority /severity of the issues listed in
> the meta-issue;
>
>
>
Hello Marco,
I don't know but I expect that it is not yet fully supported. The
Android port of OpenOffice is somewhat independent of the main project.
We would like to work closer with the people who are behind this port to
support them where we can and to push this version forward. I hope they
wi
On 27/05/14 23:37, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 05/27/2014 01:30 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> @Joe:
>> See my last my mail.
>>
>> Lesson learned:
>> I've just seen what was updated in my workspace. But there is no hint
>> that other commits will be taken into account, too. Until you open this
>> link
On 27/05/14 21:25, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Herbert Duerr wrote:
>> The "localized" and "stable" folders only provide the old 3.2.x, 3.3.0
>> and 3.4.x releases, so getting more than 28000 weekly downloads there is
>> an alarming signal.
>
> This could be our fault too. It seems that "localized" i
Hi,
does anybody have an idea what happened with the API page in the wiki,
it seems to be empty but it isn't. I have no idea and was wondering
while searching for some other stuff ...
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/API
Any hints or help is welcome
Juergen
On 28/05/14 15:51, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> does anybody have an idea what happened with the API page in the wiki,
>> it seems to be empty but it isn't. I have no idea and was wondering
>> while searching for some other stuff ...
>> http
Hi,
I have integrated googletest (gtest) in our build environment and it can
be used now. A first simple test in sal (sal/qa/sal) is using gtest now.
Some basic information and references can be found on [1]. See also the
related task id [2]
A further and deeper integration in gbuild (similar to
On 03/06/14 10:03, Guy Waterval wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> Hi all,
>
> 2014-06-03 8:41 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
>
>> Guy Waterval wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to know which kind of contacts has the AOO project with the
>>> EuroOffice group
>>>
>>
>> No formal contacts, but representatives from Multira
On 03/06/14 09:41, Andre Fischer wrote:
> I would like to give a short status update about the new OOXML framework.
>
> - Created the new module main/ooxml
> There are not yet any makefiles that build the contents of the ooxml/
> module nor link it into the build process of OpenOffice. However,
On 03/06/14 13:20, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you aware of Apache POI?
>
> Reads and writes most Ooxml in Java.
yes, we know POI and Andrea pointed already on thread where this was
discussed.
When you look in the details Java is used for the SchemaParser and later
on to generate a C++ par
the work have to be done. I hope some volunteers are
interested to help and start working on it.
Question or detailed discussion about problems or migration steps are
welcome here on the list and can be discussed.
Juergen
On 02/06/14 13:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have i
Hi,
I receive regularly some statistics about our FB page and would like to
share it with you.
Last WeekPrevious WeekTrend
Total Page Likes 12,288 12,254 0.3%
New Likes48 31 54.8%
Weekly Total Reach
Hi,
I have checked the AOO API plugin for NetBeans, especially NB 8 together
with AOO 4.1.0. Some changes were necessary to make it working and more
changes to replace deprecated APIs ;-) For now it work on MacOS and will
do some further tests on Linux and Windows. As far as I have finished
this I
On 05/06/14 10:25, Tal Daniel wrote:
> Instead of the usual issues headache, I'd like to say "Thank you!":
> Thank you for coding OO to open text documents at the last edit position;
> Thanks for coding OO to support word completion.
> Thanks for continuously listening to others' requests, too.
>
Hi,
over the last weeks we have seen some bugs that seems to be serious
enough to provide a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release. Well this is at least my
opinion and I would like to volunteer again to manage such a bugfix
release as acting release manager.
The issue 124985 [1] can be seen as a meta issue wh
On 05/06/14 22:12, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> The issue 124985 [1] can be seen as a meta issue where we have started
>> to collect potential candidates for a AOO 4.1.1 bugfix release.
>
> Seeing the list, I agree a 4.1.1 is desirable.
>
>> I
On 06/06/14 23:43, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Maybe some volunteers have interest to adapt further existing unit
>> tests, the idea is to migrate all existing tests from cppunit to
>> gtest. ...
>> [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/w
On 10/06/14 23:54, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/10/2014 11:58 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>> Another update of my progress.
>>
>> I can now create a validating parser, i.e. one that checks that a
>> document conforms to the specs while it parses its content.
>> At the moment the validation is restric
On 10/06/14 23:40, Greg Rivera wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> My name is Greg Rivera and am interested in becoming a dev for Open Office!
>
> I am from Los Angeles and am a back-end web developer doing mostly Java. I
> do have experience in C++ (still my preferred language :). I will continue
> follow
On 11/06/14 08:21, jan i wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We have been offered a possibility to have a AOO event just after ApacheCon
> EU.
>
> ApacheCon EU is monday-wednesday, so the AOO event can be thursday and
> friday, in parallel with a cloudstack event.
>
> There are costs asociated with the offering, h
Hi,
a possible schedule for AOO 4.1.1 is not yet finally discussed and
defined but I would like to propose some further issues that are related
to make the code working on MacOS 10.9.3.
First I propose that we develop the AOO 4.1.1 on the existing branch
AOO410 because it should be a minor bugfix
On 11/06/14 19:51, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/11/2014 11:14 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>> Hi,
>>
>> a possible schedule for AOO 4.1.1 is not yet finally discussed and
>> defined but I would like to propose some further issues that are related
>> to make
On 12/06/14 01:41, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I am not sure if this is desired, but it appears the configure.in script
> does set’s ENABLE_NSS_MODULE=NO if the category-b flag is enabled. Is this
> wrong or right? I need the security features enabled.
>
It is correct, we enable some features th
On 12/06/14 08:19, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/06/14 19:51, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 06/11/2014 11:14 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> a possible schedule for AOO 4.1.1 is not yet finally discussed and
>>> defined but I would like to
301 - 400 of 1173 matches
Mail list logo
