Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Dear Jim, Matthias, All, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:12:09PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > That's right... I'll wait to even try compiling until things settle > down and we have some slowly moving target I can compile and build > against. > > > On Feb 8, 2022, at 6:06 AM, Matthias Seidel > > wr

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hi Arrigo, Am 10.02.22 um 15:21 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Dear Jim, Matthias, All, > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:12:09PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> That's right... I'll wait to even try compiling until things settle >> down and we have some slowly moving target I can compile and build >>

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hello Matthias, On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:42:16PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Arrigo, > > Am 10.02.22 um 15:21 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > > Dear Jim, Matthias, All, > > > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:12:09PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> That's right... I'll wait to even try comp

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hi Arrigo, Am 10.02.22 um 17:00 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello Matthias, > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:42:16PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 10.02.22 um 15:21 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Dear Jim, Matthias, All, >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:12:09PM -0500, Jim J

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hi Arrigo, On 2/10/22 11:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Hello Matthias, On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:42:16PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Arrigo, Am 10.02.22 um 15:21 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Dear Jim, Matthias, All, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:12:09PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: That'

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hi Matthias, all > On 02/10/2022 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > I think Jim has Java 7 available, since we always built AOO41X with it. Is there any reason for not updating to Java 8 which is still maintained? Maybe we can let go of Java 7? Regards, Pedro --

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hi Pedro, Am 10.02.22 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, all > >> On 02/10/2022 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> I think Jim has Java 7 available, since we always built AOO41X with it. > Is there any reason for not updating to Java 8 which is still maintained? > Maybe we can let go

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hi All, On 2/10/22 1:13 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Pedro, Am 10.02.22 um 18:16 schrieb Pedro Lino: Hi Matthias, all On 02/10/2022 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: I think Jim has Java 7 available, since we always built AOO41X with it. Is there any reason for not updating to Java 8 whi

OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

Hi, there's an exploration for the AOO wordmark. [image: image.png] Don't hesitate to give your opinion. Cordially. Corentin Verbrèghe

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Hello Carl, On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:32:57AM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Arrigo, > > On 2/10/22 11:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Matthias, > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:42:16PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > > > Hi Arrigo, > > > > > > Am 10.02.22 um 15:21 schrieb Arr

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Just a quick, small update: On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:12:02PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Carl, > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:32:57AM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote: [...] > > Asul has x86-64 JDK's available for Java 7 but that's all. > > > > https://www.azul.com/downloads/?version=java

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

What do you think ? Le jeu. 10 févr. 2022 à 20:00, Corentin Verbreghe < corentin.verbreg...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, there's an exploration for the AOO wordmark. > [image: image.png] > Don't hesitate to give your opinion. > Cordially. > Corentin Verbrèghe >

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

Hi Corentin, I don't know what to think because your attachment doesn't come through on the mailing list. ;-) Can you provide it in another way? Regards,    Matthias Am 10.02.22 um 20:44 schrieb Corentin Verbreghe: > What do you think ? > > Le jeu. 10 févr. 2022 à 20:00, Corentin Verbreghe > m

Re: RV: Aranese Spell Checking in libreoffice

Anyone else?! This issue is almost 7 years old now... Regards,    Matthias Am 08.02.22 um 19:09 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > > On 07.02.22 21:17, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Anyone who can help here? > Currently no clue. sorry. >> >> Regards, >> >>     Matthias >> >> Am 30.01.22 um 12:01

Re: OOo spelling dictionaries site closed

Hi all, Can we help here? Regards,    Matthias Am 06.02.22 um 08:41 schrieb Jean-Christophe Helary: > Matthias, Dave, > > Thank you very much for looking into this. > > If you have an equivalent repository that’s open for external access, OmegaT > will need to update its spelling dictionary in

Re: RV: Aranese Spell Checking in libreoffice

Hi Matthias, Is there an AOO issue? I don't understand. Thanks, Carl On 2/10/22 3:20 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Anyone else?! This issue is almost 7 years old now... Regards,    Matthias Am 08.02.22 um 19:09 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 07.02.22 21:17, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, Anyone

Re: RV: Aranese Spell Checking in libreoffice

Hi Carl, Javier wants to add code to AOO to support a new language: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126222 I think we should at least try to help him. Regards,    Matthias Am 10.02.22 um 22:14 schrieb Carl Marcum: > Hi Matthias, > > Is there an AOO issue? > I don't understand. > > T

Re: RV: Aranese Spell Checking in libreoffice

Am 10.02.22 um 21:20 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Anyone else?! This issue is almost 7 years old now... unfortunately, I'm not a core developer and I don't know anything about how to integrate new languages for spell checking. Marcus Am 08.02.22 um 19:09 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 07.02.22

Re: Openssl, serf and curl... and NSS

Am 10.02.22 um 20:12 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello Carl, On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:32:57AM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi Arrigo, On 2/10/22 11:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Hello Matthias, On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:42:16PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Arrigo, Am 10.02.22 um 15:21

Re: OOo spelling dictionaries site closed

Am 10.02.22 um 21:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can we help here? I think don't understand the problem: All extensions can be accessed via the extension webpage. Is this not an option? If not, what is expected? Marcus Am 06.02.22 um 08:41 schrieb Jean-Christophe Helary: Matthias, Dave,

Re: OOo spelling dictionaries site closed

Hi Marcus, Am 10.02.22 um 23:06 schrieb Marcus: > Am 10.02.22 um 21:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Can we help here? > > I think don't understand the problem: > > All extensions can be accessed via the extension webpage. Is this not > an option? If not, what is expected? Did you read the mail?!

Re: OOo spelling dictionaries site closed

Am 10.02.22 um 23:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 10.02.22 um 23:06 schrieb Marcus: Am 10.02.22 um 21:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can we help here? I think don't understand the problem: All extensions can be accessed via the extension webpage. Is this not an option? If not, what is expected?

Re: OOo spelling dictionaries site closed

Hi Marcus, Am 11.02.22 um 00:07 schrieb Marcus: > Am 10.02.22 um 23:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 10.02.22 um 23:06 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 10.02.22 um 21:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can we help here? >>> >>> I think don't understand the problem: >>> >>> All extensions can be accessed via

Re: OOo spelling dictionaries site closed

> On Feb 11, 2022, at 9:36, Matthias Seidel wrote: > > Hi Marcus, > > Am 11.02.22 um 00:07 schrieb Marcus: >> Am 10.02.22 um 23:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Am 10.02.22 um 23:06 schrieb Marcus: Am 10.02.22 um 21:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Can we help here? I think do

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

Hello, Where can I send it? Thanks Corentin Verbrèghe Le jeu. 10 févr. 2022 à 21:16, Matthias Seidel a écrit : > Hi Corentin, > > I don't know what to think because your attachment doesn't come through on > the mailing list. ;-) > > Can you provide it in another way? > > Regards, > >Matthias