I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around
the wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use.
Am 26.10.20 um 15:52 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Joost,
Am 26.10.20 um 13:19 schrieb Joost Andrae:
Hi Matthias,
I've just tried it out against a different MediaWi
Hi Peter,
Am 27.10.20 um 08:19 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around
> the wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use.
That would be great!
I have come to the conclusion, that we should offer our Wiki Publisher
on extensions.o.o
test14 is ready for testing!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Do we have the capability to do such migration? If the LO patches are under
MPL, then we can't use them.
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:19 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around the
> wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use.
>
test14
Debian 10 64bits
No error messages to open or save odt and ods files
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> test14 is ready for testing!
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.
Hi Jim,
No error messages on opening and saving on Ubuntu 16.04.
Am 27.10.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test14 is ready for testing!
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional co
Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose with
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab9
test15, likely the final test of the git bisect series, is now available.
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
test15
Debian 10 64bits
No error messages to open or save odt and ods files
No problems in test15 for me!
Matthias
Am 27.10.20 um 17:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test15, likely the final test of the git bisect series, is now available.
>
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>>
>>
As expected:
e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27 is the first bad commit
commit e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
Author: truckman
Date: Fri Aug 26 07:13:14 2016 +
Upgrade bundled raptor from raptor-1.4.18 to raptor2-2.0.15 to get the
fix for CVE-2012-0037. It is not kn
On 10/26/2020 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Joost,
>
> Am 26.10.20 um 13:19 schrieb Joost Andrae:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> I've just tried it out against a different MediaWiki and I can confirm
>> it is running well !
>
> Thanks, that's great news!
>
> @Keith: Is this useful for your docume
Hi Keith,
Am 27.10.20 um 18:52 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 10/26/2020 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Joost,
>>
>> Am 26.10.20 um 13:19 schrieb Joost Andrae:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> I've just tried it out against a different MediaWiki and I can confirm
>>> it is running well !
>> Thanks
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>
> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose
> with
>
>
Hi Kent
Welcome to Apache OpenOffice.
One of the major tasks we need Python development for at the moment is to
upgrade OpenOffice from Python 2 to 3. This is unfortunately quite
difficult, as we not only have to port Python code, but possibly C code
too, deal with patching, testing and packaging
Hi Carl,
The matching thing in groovy was a bit of a pain, but it works now. Let me know
if you have any suggestions.
Next steps are in skeleton.gsp
(1) Breadcrumbs.
(2) Branding, and navigator overrides.
Plus some settings work.
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 1:21 PM, w...@apache.org wr
Hello everyone:
AOO_4.1.8_test15 in Debian 10 (64 bits) don't show error messages. I suposse
that in Debian 9 neither. I confirm more later.
Regards,
Delio.
- Mensaje original -
De: "Delio Orozco Gonzalez"
Para: "dev"
Enviados: Lunes, 26 de Octubre 2020 19:06:58
Asunto: Re: Test to A
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>>
>> assuming that this is good, it
For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread, what we
have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the build server, which
is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x releases, nor with the configure
and build parameters (also unchanged from previous). It is th
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread,
> what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the
> build server, which is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x
> releases, nor with the configure and build parameters (al
Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, configure did
the "right thing". So if something is causing configure to make a different
decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new stuff that the RDF stuff
does. The problem is with the patch or how it is working...
In an
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which I don't
think we use anymore
Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
recent era (Apache), so it should serve as a lesson: Adfinis contributed
a server, got Goo
Hi Andrea,
Am 27.10.20 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
>> Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which
>> I don't think we use anymore
>
> Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
> recent era (Apache), so i
Dave Fisher wrote:
I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that metrics
needs a specific discussion.
Initially I’ll comment this out.
Do I understand well that there is no technical reason whatsoever to get
rid of Google Analytics, and that the discussion is purely
Maybe the following link helps?
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
Kay did migrate stuff in 2018 I think. Maybe went a bit unnoticed?
Is this what the Server had contained?
Am 27.10.20 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Dave Fisher wrote:
>> I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that
>> metrics needs a specific discussion.
>> Initially I’ll comment this out.
>
> Do I understand well that there is
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the
Am 27.10.20 um 23:22 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that metrics
needs a specific discussion.
Initially I’ll comment this out.
Do I u
Possible... esp w/ raptor that saw a huge bump from 1.x to 2.x...
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 6:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>> t
What git migration?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>> Am 27.10.20 um 23:22 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Hi -
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> Dave Fisher wrote:
I will be doing the in
Hi,
Confirmed: «AOO_4.1.8_test15» in Debian 9, 64 bits, don't show error messages.
Regards,
Delio.
- Mensaje original -
De: "Delio Orozco Gonzalez"
Para: "dev"
Enviados: Martes, 27 de Octubre 2020 17:08:07
Asunto: Re: Test to Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US-v2
Hi Andrea,
On 10/27/20 5:58 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which
I don't think we use anymore
Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
recent era (Apache), so it should s
Hi -
The new repository is https://GitHub.com/Apache/OpenOffice-org
The next steps are to finish the templates.
(Wednesday)
(1) Breadcrumbs
(2) Branding/Navigation adjustments per directory
(Thursday)
(3) Staging / Test server with Infra help
(Friday)
(4) Directory migration script
(5) Release
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately.
> I have a few questions:
>
> 1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests
> provide vs.functionality?
>
> 2. Is there yet a place to list
34 matches
Mail list logo
