oooforum opened a new pull request #104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/104
Modify GetProductInfo function
Actually returns Product Name and Build version in one string
Example: OpenOffice4.1.7
Adding a space between these to split in two strings
Now: OpenOffice 4
I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will update
to head and pull in nss
> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> Any progress on nss?
>
> On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it
>>
OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request
is borked.
Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>
> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>
> Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>
> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull
> request is borked.
>
>
Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>>
>> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>>
>>Only in misc/build/nss
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can
soak for a while.
>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> OK..
++1
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
>
> I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can
> soak for a while.
>
>>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19
DonLewisFreeBSD commented on pull request #100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/100#issuecomment-704403118
Another test would be to open an existing validly signed document and
verifying that the signature is valid.
--
Because of this break for Linux, we needed to update the patch file for nss,
which means a new Git rev.
this means we need to bump from m1 -> m2 (et.al.) and thus create a new tag
AOO418-RC2. I'll start work on that...
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual
Hi Jim,
Am 06.10.20 um 21:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Because of this break for Linux, we needed to update the patch file for nss,
> which means a new Git rev.
>
> this means we need to bump from m1 -> m2 (et.al.) and thus create a new tag
> AOO418-RC2. I'll start work on that...
OK, let me kno
The new RC has been tagged (AOO418-RC2).
I'll start my rebuilds tomorrow am
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 4:15 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 06.10.20 um 21:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Because of this break for Linux, we needed to update the patch file for nss,
>> which means a new
Am 06.10.20 um 22:27 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> The new RC has been tagged (AOO418-RC2).
>
> I'll start my rebuilds tomorrow am
OK, since the Windows builds take a bit longer I will start early...
>
>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 4:15 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 06.10.20 um 21:50 sc
On 6 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> jim pushed a commit to branch AOO418
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/AOO418 by this push:
> n
Hi Desmond,
thank you very much for your interest in Apache OpenOffice.
Please note that the Apache OpenOffice project do not have an own mirror
system anymore as it was as OpenOffice belonged to Sun and Oracle.
But Apache has an own mirror system you can participate in.
Especially for OpenO
14 matches
Mail list logo
