Re: [discussion] svn migration plan

2019-07-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Peter, Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > back to the initial discussion. Obviously you didn't read my mail until the end... > > I have created the request. Simply requesting that trunc, branch and > tags are moved. All other folders should remain as is. > > I hope this suits everyone

Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-07-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
You got it... for 4.1.7 or 4.2.0-dev? > On Jul 22, 2019, at 6:56 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > If your time permits, can you provide new builds for Linux (and macOS)? > > I made some changes that l would like to check. > > Regards, > >Matthias > > > Am 01.07.19 um 17:47

Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-07-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, 4.2.0, please. 64 bit would be preferred. ;-) Meanwhile we are trying to get the buildbots working again: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17822 Regards,    Matthias Am 23.07.19 um 18:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > You got it... for 4.1.7 or 4.2.0-dev? > >> On Jul 22, 2019, at

Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-07-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
You got it... I will be using my normal CentOS7 build server. I assume HEAD of the http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO42X/ branch. > On Jul 23, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > 4.2.0, please. 64 bit would be preferred. ;-) > > Meanwhile we are tryi

Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-07-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Yes... ;-) This should be r1863580. en-US and de if possible. Thanks! Am 23.07.19 um 19:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > You got it... I will be using my normal CentOS7 build server. > > I assume HEAD of the http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO42X/ > branch. > >> On Jul 23, 2019, at

Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-07-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
building the Linux build as we speak > On Jul 23, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Yes... ;-) > > This should be r1863580. en-US and de if possible. > > Thanks! > > Am 23.07.19 um 19:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> You got it... I will be using my normal CentOS7 build server. >>

Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-07-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 23.07.19 um 20:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > building the Linux build as we speak Thanks! > >> On Jul 23, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Yes... ;-) >> >> This should be r1863580. en-US and de if possible. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Am 23.07.19 um 19:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Yo

Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Bidouille
Maybe for AOO v5.0... 1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074 2) Python 2.7 is end of life for 2020 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123975 3) OOXML Interoperability Enhance existing import filter (lot of issues) and crea

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Peter
I am with you that 1 and 2 become a pressing issue. However i see win 64 and getting rid of dmake bevor ooxml. About versions. I think it is a good idea to use the first version as indicator for incompatible Api change. The second and 3rd digit as we want. I am not sure we should use 3 digits

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2019-07-23 1:20 p.m., Bidouille wrote: 1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074 As I commented on this bug, jdk-12.0.1.jdk works on both AOO 4.1.6 and AOO Developer Build 4.2.0 on my Mac using macOS Mojave version 10.14.5 L

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:20 PM Bidouille wrote: > Maybe for AOO v5.0... > > 1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074 > > The bug for AdoptOpenJDK is https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128157 and I think it should be << v5.0