Am 28.10.2017 um 04:17 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> A friend is sending me a JDK7.
>
> But I agree.
>
> I think that these changes should be backported to 4.1.5. The redland and
> raptor updates should be backported too.
>
> RMs Jim / Matthias - what do you think?
Don't ask me, I only pr
Am 26.10.2017 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> A short summary of the post-release steps for 4.1.4 I'm going to take
> care of, since we are now at the "7 days after release" mark:
>
> 1) Security reports for 4.1.4 are now published at
> https://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html
> Nothin
Unless the changes are also in 4.1.4 or are super-urgent, I do not think
they belong in 4.1.5. 4.1.5, which we hope will never be released, is
for fixes to 4.1.4 that are too urgent to wait for 4.2.
On 10/27/2017 7:17 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Damjan,
A friend is sending me a JDK7.
But I agr
I at first thought this might be a load problem. It is now clear it is a
case of file corruption on save, only on Mac.
Unfortunately, that means I am out of ideas, other than checking that
your original test has been done on the file save. The fixes I know
about are intended to affect file loa
Am 26.10.2017 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> A short summary of the post-release steps for 4.1.4 I'm going to take
> care of, since we are now at the "7 days after release" mark:
>
> 1) Security reports for 4.1.4 are now published at
> https://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html
> Nothin
Peter Kovacs wrote:
Am Samstag, den 28.10.2017, 00:40 +0200 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
this thread was actually to address the problem with actually
changing release numbers in code, nothing else.
It does not adress the problem with release models. It works only
around them. Is there a bug report
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Unless the changes are also in 4.1.4 or are super-urgent, I do not think
they belong in 4.1.5. 4.1.5, which we hope will never be released, is
for fixes to 4.1.4 that are too urgent to wait for 4.2.
Confirmed. 4.2 should get all the focus. Nothing gets in AOO415 (which
Hi -
I’ve attached a diff of the differences between 4.1.3 and 4.1.4. I hope that
this helps. If I had a working build I would be looking into undoing a change
at a time to see which had the impact on the save of links on Mac.
I am also suspicious of tooling and what caused the link xml to be c
> On Oct 28, 2017, at 9:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> Unless the changes are also in 4.1.4 or are super-urgent, I do not think
>> they belong in 4.1.5. 4.1.5, which we hope will never be released, is
>> for fixes to 4.1.4 that are too urgent to wait for 4.2.
>
>
The original bug report said "This wasn't an issue of AOO 4.1.3, but is
an issue of AOO 4.1.4" so we are looking for something that changed.
I would have assumed that the same libraries would be used in writing
the main content.xml and the one in the 'Object 1' subdirectory. The
main content.x
Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 26.10.2017 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
- Enable feeds for 4.1.3 in French, German, Italian (three random
"medium-size" languages) within the next 24 hours.
I was a bit curious and looked around. ;-)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/genUpdateFe
Am 28.10.2017 um 20:07 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 26.10.2017 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> - Enable feeds for 4.1.3 in French, German, Italian (three random
>>> "medium-size" languages) within the next 24 hours.
>> I was a bit curious and looked around. ;-)
>> h
Hi -
> On Oct 28, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> The original bug report said "This wasn't an issue of AOO 4.1.3, but is an
> issue of AOO 4.1.4" so we are looking for something that changed.
>
> I would have assumed that the same libraries would be used in writing the
> main
Dave Fisher wrote:
We ought to factor out the build tooling by comparing a build based on 4.1.3
with the bug to rule out a tooling regression.
Very good suggestion. Building 4.1.3 on exactly the same system and with
exactly the same config used for 4.1.4 will tell us whether this is
related
Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 28.10.2017 um 20:07 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
You didn't only look around, you committed stuff and I'll now try to
review it. But yes, I confirm that one is the tool we use.
Only small changes for https... I couldn't resist! ;-)
OK, no problem! But as you will see in
> Italian done. Actually I decided to keep Mac on hold, since I'd like to know
> more about https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127568 before pushing
> the update to all users. If others feel the same, we can keep Mac
> notifications pending for the time being.
+1 to delay Mac notice.
R
Dave Fisher wrote:
BTW - Damjan’s changes are javadoc related and absolutely needed on modern Macs
where getting JDK7 is not easy. We cannot be so conservative that we are afraid
of upgrades.
Yes we can. And not only we can, but we should (a personal opinion of
course).
It must be clear to
> On Oct 28, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Dave Fisher wrote:
>> We ought to factor out the build tooling by comparing a build based on 4.1.3
>> with the bug to rule out a tooling regression.
>
> Very good suggestion. Building 4.1.3 on exactly the same system and with
> exactl
Am 28.10.2017 um 22:12 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 28.10.2017 um 20:07 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> You didn't only look around, you committed stuff and I'll now try to
>>> review it. But yes, I confirm that one is the tool we use.
>>
>> Only small changes for https... I
On 10/28/2017 12:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
We ought to factor out the build tooling by comparing a build based on
4.1.3 with the bug to rule out a tooling regression.
Very good suggestion. Building 4.1.3 on exactly the same system and with
exactly the same config used f
Matthias Seidel wrote:
But knowing that now one thing comes to my mind:
If we *would* enable permanent redirection to HTTPS for the website, we
may have to exclude http://installation.openoffice.org/description
otherwise it would break the update feed?
No, this is not a problem. It is not a rea
21 matches
Mail list logo
