4.1.4 virus warning - False positive?

On Forum today was posted the following from a user > My G-data (my Antivirus software) has reported as follows:: > Junkware (PUP): Win32.Adware.Narn.D (Engine B) > Datei: Updater.exe > Verzeichnis: C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\OpenOffice Updater This is most likely a "false positive" and I have

SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Hi To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver continues to advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where "Refresh Tables" causes everything done to tables from then on to fail (as Base keeps holding references to the old table/view/user/group containers, so co

Re: [Build] XCode 8.3.3 / 4.1.4 - quicktime.h header missing

I also run from the Terminal... well, iTerm. > On Oct 26, 2017, at 8:08 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Downloading the SDK now. > > While I wait - I run from terminal are you running elsewhere? > >> On Oct 26, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Jim Jagielski > > wrote: >> >> sdk 10.9 lack

Re: 4.1.4 virus warning - False positive?

Am 27.10.2017 um 11:07 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > On Forum today was posted the following from a user > >> My G-data (my Antivirus software) has reported as follows:: >> Junkware (PUP): Win32.Adware.Narn.D (Engine B) >> Datei: Updater.exe >> Verzeichnis: C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\OpenOffice Updat

Re: 4.1.4 virus warning - False positive?

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:55:04 +0200 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 27.10.2017 um 11:07 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > > On Forum today was posted the following from a user > > > >> My G-data (my Antivirus software) has reported as follows:: > >> Junkware (PUP): Win32.Adware.Narn.D (Engine B) > >> Datei: U

Re: [Build] XCode 8.3.3 / 4.1.4 - quicktime.h header missing

Hi Jim, OK. That helped, but now I am stuck because in odk and javadoc generation. dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxmaccx.pro/bin/odkcommon/docs/java/ref/index.html' dmake: '../../unxmaccx.pro/bin/odkcommon/docs/java/ref/index.html' removed. 1 module(s): odk need(s) to be r

Re: [Build] XCode 8.3.3 / 4.1.4 - quicktime.h header missing

Attached is the build script I've been using (also in devtools/build-scripts): it describes the env and the programs installed (and versions)... I do use Java7 #!/bin/sh ### 4.1.2 Script: ### 4.1.2 Script: echo "### Configure" ### 4.1.2 Script: ./configure \ ### 4.1.2 Script: --with-b

Re: [Build] XCode 8.3.3 / 4.1.4 - quicktime.h header missing

Hi Jim, Thanks. Not quite what is in devtools, I’ll adjust. That said here is something from my system: $ /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7 Unable to find any JVMs matching version "1.7". /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_131.jdk/Contents/Home What is yours? I guess I need to look further

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Hi Damjan, Am 27.10.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > Hi > > To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver continues to > advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where "Refresh > Tables" causes everything done to tables from then on to fail (as Base > kee

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Am Freitag, den 27.10.2017, 11:18 +0200 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > Hi *wave* > > To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver > continues to > advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where > "Refresh > Tables" causes everything done to tables from then on to fa

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Hi - As an aside I am working on Mac builds for 4.1.4 and it looks like uno does not like JDK 8+, something to do with javadocs, but not sure as I am looking for JDK7 … If I can get things working I will be willing to try builds for you on trunk or a branch as you make changes. Regards, Dave

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Am 27.10.2017 um 20:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 27.10.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: To update you on my development efforts, the PostgreSQL driver continues to advance. I recently added views and fixed a major problem where "Refresh Tables" causes everything done to tables from the

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Am 27.10.2017 um 21:19 schrieb Dave Fisher: > Hi - > > As an aside I am working on Mac builds for 4.1.4 and it looks like uno does > not like JDK 8+, something to do with javadocs, but not sure as I am looking > for JDK7 … Do you need the SDK? From our release notes (Known Issues): For develop

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Hi Matthias, It is no longer easy to get EOLed JDKs. You have to pay Oracle for support. You have to pay Apple to get the old SDKs you need for Mac OpenOffice. I don’t mind paying Apple as I have the goal of trying to sign the Application to avoid Gatekeeper. I have the Xcode stuff and I’ve fou

Re: [Issue 127574] New: Out of date OSX version

Hi - I fixed this issue. I just created a BZ id - dave2w...@comcast.net - would someone grant me PMC rights. Thanks, Dave > On Oct 27, 2017, at 1:41 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127574 > > Issue ID: 127574 >Issue Type: DEFECT >

Re: [Issue 127574] New: Out of date OSX version

Dave Fisher wrote: I just created a BZ id - dave2w...@comcast.net - would someone grant me PMC rights. Use your @apache.org e-mail for the Bugzilla account and you will get them automatically (of course they can be granted manually too, by a Bugzilla admin, if you prefer to use a non-ASF mai

Re: [Issue 127574] New: Out of date OSX version

Please remember to use something like the follwoing to provide a commit message that is automatically logged into the BZ issue: #i123456# Marcus Am 27.10.2017 um 22:56 schrieb Dave Fisher: Hi - I fixed this issue. I just created a BZ id - dave2w...@comcast.net - would someone grant me PM

Re: [PROPOSAL] Managing branches for future releases

Disclaimer: I do not claime that one solution is the ultimate solution over the other. But I would like to explain my approach as long as it takes until everybody says he understood what I am suggesting. Nothing more nothing less. No religeous war is intended or whished from my side. end disclaime

Re: [PROPOSAL] Managing branches for future releases

Am 27.10.2017 um 23:28 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Disclaimer: I do not claime that one solution is the ultimate solution over the other. But I would like to explain my approach as long as it takes until everybody says he understood what I am suggesting. Nothing more nothing less. No religeous war is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Managing branches for future releases

Hi - I’ll bite on a discussion. Overall I think that we are mixing two different purposes. (1) Keeping track of what is or may be released. This is what the current scheme does well when we are on a branch and not so well when we are on trunk. (2) Managing the lifecycle of a particular release.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Managing branches for future releases

Peter Kovacs wrote: I hope I did not scare anyone with this lengthy explanation now. No, but it is just off-topic. This is partially my fault since "Managing branches" in the subject could be read as a proposal for a branching model. But this is totally not the topic here. The issue here is

Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Apply these commits to 4.1.x and you'll be able to build AOO with Java 8: 1697228 1697237 1697247 1697306 1697312 I don't know why they haven't been backported yet. Damjan On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > It is no longer easy to get EOLed JDKs. You have t

[4.1.5] Re: SDBC developments and the JDBC driver port

Hi Damjan, A friend is sending me a JDK7. But I agree. I think that these changes should be backported to 4.1.5. The redland and raptor updates should be backported too. RMs Jim / Matthias - what do you think? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 27, 2017, at 7:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic

Re: [PROPOSAL] Managing branches for future releases

Am Samstag, den 28.10.2017, 00:40 +0200 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Peter Kovacs wrote: > > I hope I did not scare anyone with this lengthy explanation now. > > No, but it is just off-topic. This is partially my fault since > "Managing > branches" in the subject could be read as a proposal for a b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Managing branches for future releases

Am Freitag, den 27.10.2017, 23:36 +0200 schrieb Marcus: > > sorry, but yes. > > At the moment I've not the time and mood to read and understand such > long mails. So, please don't expect an answer from me. I see. I am sorry. I will keep then my Ideas to me. Do them if I have time, suggest if I h