On 15/08/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
This was based on my understanding that starting w/ 4.2.0, AOO
required 10.9/Mavericks or greater.
Required based on what? On the current trunk code, on some architectural
limitations, on build environment? We are still receiving the occasional
mails of 10.6
The build warnings and errors using any SDK older than 10.9 on trunk.
> On Aug 16, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> On 15/08/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> This was based on my understanding that starting w/ 4.2.0, AOO
>> required 10.9/Mavericks or greater.
>
> Required based on what
Hi Don,
it worked like a charm! ;-)
My first AOO 4.2.0 builds are to be found here:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
My next build will be with "--enable-win-x64-shellext" but I suspect it
will stop because of expat2.2.3.
(For 4.1.4 we reverted to Jims patch)
Matthias
I fixed the --enable-win-x64-shellext problem in r1805208.
On 16 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> it worked like a charm! ;-)
>
> My first AOO 4.2.0 builds are to be found here:
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>
> My next build will be with "--enable-win-x64
Am 16.08.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I fixed the --enable-win-x64-shellext problem in r1805208.
Great!
Now we could have all Windows buildbots in release quality!
(If they were only functional and Infra would assign my ticket...)
BTW: Should we backport r1805208 to 4.1.4?
>
> On 16 Aug, M
Hi Nicolas,
your fix is working great. However, the selection of branches is a bit
old. Is there a chance to get newer branches into Opengrok?
In SVN we have some more [1] and it would be great to get all 4.1.x
release branches as selection here [2].
Or maybe is there a way that we can add
On 16 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 16.08.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> I fixed the --enable-win-x64-shellext problem in r1805208.
>
> Great!
> Now we could have all Windows buildbots in release quality!
> (If they were only functional and Infra would assign my ticket...)
>
> BTW: Should
Hi Marcus
See my answer inline, below:
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 21:00 +0200, Marcus wrote:
[...]
> However, the selection of branches is a bit
> old. Is there a chance to get newer branches into Opengrok?
Sure! :)
> In SVN we have some more [1] and it would be great to get all 4.1.x
> release br