Re: Buildbot upgrades broken ?

2017-06-28 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 28.06.2017 um 02:59 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > Hi > >> On 28 Jun 2017, at 2:18 am, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >> Gavin McDonald wrote: >>> https://forum.openoffice.org ... >>> https://wiki.openoffice.org ... >>> We need to migrate these services over to new fully puppetized VMs. >> One thing to r

Re: Forums and Wiki VM Migrations

2017-06-28 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Andrea, After the migration I would love to have some kind of administrative access to the Wiki. Would that be possible? Kind regards, Matthias Am 27.06.2017 um 18:18 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Gavin McDonald wrote: >> https://forum.openoffice.org ... >> https://wiki.openoffice.org ... >> We

Re: Release 4.1.4 - Can we add a script to the release to help user support in working around an issue?

2017-06-28 Thread John Ha yahoo
Peter See Spell checker "red wriggly lines" - beta test fix where three users with spell check problems have downloaded the python script and reported back that it ran successfully. I asked any who do run it to report back s

Re: Forums and Wiki VM Migrations

2017-06-28 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Matthias Seidel wrote: After the migration I would love to have some kind of administrative access to the Wiki. Would that be possible? Sure, we just need (lazy) consensus from this list, i.e., nobody saying that they oppose, so that's easy. What access would you like to have? 1) Access to t

Test builds for Windows

2017-06-28 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi at all, I am just doing a build of AOO414 including all 41 available languages. (This is done mainly to see if my VM with Windows 10 can handle it and how long it takes) If you want to test a language which is not currently listed here: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-414-Test

Re: Forums and Wiki VM Migrations

2017-06-28 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Andrea, Am 28.06.2017 um 18:03 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> After the migration I would love to have some kind of administrative >> access to the Wiki. >> Would that be possible? > > Sure, we just need (lazy) consensus from this list, i.e., nobody > saying that they oppo