Re: Add This Feature to Writer ASAP

On 30/09/2016 06:09, Kirk Fraser wrote: > The most needed feature is a book section organizer like Scrivner which has Organon jonathon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release > manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with me. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc D

Which source files in release?

I am trying to select the files that should go in the zip and tar files for the source release for 4.1.3. I did a clean checkout of the 4.1.3 branch, and then deleted the .svn directories that I know do not belong in the source release. The 4.1.2 release includes the following dot files: ./a

4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 126605] Make sure the source package does not contain extra files

Andrea Pescetti has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 126605: Make sure the source package does not contain extra files https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Pescetti --- This is a good candidate for fixing in trunk first and 4.1.4 later. I'm not pro

Re: Which source files in release?

I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" Since our build instructions and processes are based on the result of an svn checkout, basing the source package on one seemed obvious to me. The only change

Re: Which source files in release?

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, > "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" > > Since our build instructions and processes are based on the result of an svn > checkout

Re: Which source files in release?

> On Sep 30, 2016, at 07:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, >> "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" >> >> Since our build i

Re: Which source files in release?

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:19:25AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On Sep 30, 2016, at 07:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, > >> "Make

Successfully built ApacheOO trunk in Debian Sid (Unstable)

Niltze, all- First time I build ApacheOO in Debian Sid for AMD64. I found this quirk towards the end of the build routine: [...] Calculating Installed-Size... Building Debian binary distribution... dpkg --build openoffice-core03_4.2.0-1_amd64 Packaging failed! Reason is target packaging requires

Translate offline

Hi i continue doing some translations to AOO, but I saw that translate.apache.org is offline. If someone can do something to warn the infra, is a good thing. Thanks in advance, Claudio Ferreira

Re: Which source files in release?

Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: there is no need to reinvent the wheel, I guess ;) Indeed. I've bumped the bug report just to give visibility to the scripts we already had. you need to fix the ant build script first, see the bug report Fixing the script results in a commit. We agree that thi

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with me. I would be very happy

RE: Windows 10 Anniversary confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

I ran the install of the 2016-09-29 AOO4.1.3-dev r1761381 (still) to see how the VC++ redistributables worked. I saw the redistributables install again, apparently being newer as expected. The main AOO install did not run because the same version was detected as already installed. After uninst

RE: Windows XP confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

This time, before running the 2016-09-29 installer, I uninstalled the previous AOO 4.1.3-dev install in my Windows XP VM. That installed fine. It appears that the checking for installed VC++ redistributables is invisible on Windows XP, but visible on Windows 10 Anniversary edition. On the XP

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

On 9/30/2016 10:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection,

Re: Introduction

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Xen wrote: > R. Mark Aldrich schreef op 28-09-2016 22:55: > > Section 5 starts with >> "A useful shortcut notation you will often see on the lists.", which >> makes sense if you read it as Yoda, but I think it would make more >> sense to change it to "You will of

Re: Which source files in release?

On 9/30/2016 9:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: there is no need to reinvent the wheel, I guess ;) Indeed. I've bumped the bug report just to give visibility to the scripts we already had. you need to fix the ant build script first, see the bug report Fixing the

RE: Which source files in release?

Instead of removing the .svn dirs/files with a script, use the built in 'svn export' which exports the checkout without all the .svn dirs/files. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.ref.svn.c.export.html Gav... > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] >