I hope it's not too late. But it should be also a normal thing:
Please take care that the naming structure for dirs and files is exactly
the same like for the other 4.1.x releases. The only difference should
be the version number. But what I've seen from the commits so far looks
good.
Otherw
Am 09/23/2016 08:41 PM, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Just a FYI that I now have 4 build VMs available that I will
use: OSX 10.11/Xcode 7.3.1, Ubuntu 14.04/64bit, CentOS5.11/64bit
and CentOS5.11/32bit.
So far, successful builds on OSX and the 64bit Ubuntu and CentOS5
VMs; haven't tried the 32bit one ye
Hi Aleksandr,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:05:55PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
> The build fails on Linux Mint 17.1 with the following messages:
>
> [ build LNK ] Library/passwordcontainer.uno.so
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a(stack_chk_fail_local.oS): In
> function `__stack_chk_fai
Hello Ariel,
On Sep 25, 2016 12:11 PM, "Ariel Constenla-Haile"
wrote:
>
>
> This looks the build bot error:
>
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
>
> Are you building trunk or a branch?
>
I was trying to build trunk. Is that not the
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:51:44AM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
> Hello Ariel,
>
> On Sep 25, 2016 12:11 PM, "Ariel Constenla-Haile"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This looks the build bot error:
> >
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt
> >
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> It's OK; I just asked because I haven't seen this error before on trunk;
> it seems some Ubuntu specific problem
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags
> there, it suggested to add -fno-stack-protector or -nostdlib.
>
Do
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@op
Dear Webmaster,
I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my
site - formsbirds.com or remove them completely.
We found thousands of links pointed to our site from templates.openoffice.org.
The links are under an account named susie...@yandex.com.
This was cause
We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.
On 9/25/2016 7:51 AM, Formsbirds wrote:
Dear Webmaster,
I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my
site - formsbird
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
> control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.
More than that, the site looks like it has more than just the OP using it
for SEO. Read t
On 9/25/2016 9:04 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.
More than that, the site looks like it has mo
Am 09/25/2016 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/24/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/23/2016 10:18 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/23/2016 10:12 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 9/23/2016 1:00 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 09/23/2016 09:26 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:25:
Am 09/25/2016 07:11 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 9/25/2016 9:04 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of
reque
Hi Dave,
in a previous mail this month you have written that you are available
for help in case of topics that belogs to Sourceforge. Actually we have
now a case that needs to be worked on on your side.
Like reported below they have a problem with redirected links from
"templates.openoffice.
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Wi
What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ?
Empirically, it does not reproduce in 4.1.3. Do we have a definite patch
for it? Should I list it in the 4.1.3 release notes as having been fixed.
-
To u
Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ?
IMHO Ariel should/could tell us what he has done with his Mac builds as
the first positive verifications came with his builds [1]. I really hope
he can. ;-)
Empirical
I am just starting level 1: How the apache openoffice project works
I finished reading about how apache works.
[Comments, suggestions, improvements welcome.]
Release Notes for Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3
General Remarks
===
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 is a maintenance release incorporating security
fixes, updated dictionaries, and build fixes.
A 4.1.2 regression, https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_b
Hello
Do we have a test build for MacOSX 64 bit?
Then I will check it
Mechtilde
Am 25.09.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>> What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ?
>
> IMHO Ariel should/could tell us what he ha
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/
On 9/25/2016 10:29 PM, Mechtilde wrote:
Hello
Do we have a test build for MacOSX 64 bit?
Then I will check it
Mechtilde
Am 25.09.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
What is the st
22 matches
Mail list logo
