On 26/08/15 00:56, Tony Stevenson wrote:
>> I don't want to have my communications to now be taken with
>> more authority than they would were I not the Chair.
>
> For anyone who knows how the ASF works they will know that this is not
> even possible. As you are no more senior, and therefore c
2015-08-28 15:38 GMT+02:00 toki :
> On 26/08/15 00:56, Tony Stevenson wrote:
>
> >> I don't want to have my communications to now be taken with
> >> more authority than they would were I not the Chair.
> >
> > For anyone who knows how the ASF works they will know that this is not
> > even possible
+1
Thank you for working on this. Having working unit tests is key for
future development!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google
> Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and hasn't been routinely
> built with cppunit for a while, which means our unit tests are in a
> state of neglect, and un
>From an AOO PMC Member,
I have compiled a high-level traffic analysis of discussion activity on the
OpenOffice PMC private@ oo.a.o list. These are *statistics* and noisy ones at
that. I am looking for trends that are good-enough at this level of precision.
It is in the nature of private@ th
With a correction already,
Of all the messages sent,
84.3% are by members of the PMC,
13.4% are by other ASF participants, and
2.3% are by others.
[The extra decimals are simply to achieve a confirmable total of 100%,
precision not so much.]
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E.
So what, if anything, should we take away from this? My (completely
superficial, naive and uninformed) feeling is that that is a LOT of traffic
on the "private" list. But maybe not. Anyway, is the idea here that there
should be less traffic on that list? More? The same?
I have to admit, I've be
On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The three patches for the "basic" part are probably easier to understand
separately:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst?r1=1583558&r2=1602195&pathrev=1602195&diff_format=h
https://svn.apache.org/v
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> The three patches for the "basic" part are probably easier to understand
>> separately:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst?r1=1
I've heard that it is a whole lot and much more that the PMC policies warrant.
I dug into this to find out exactly what "a whole lot" is and whether it is a
way to demonstrate, without breaching confidentiality, when activity more
aligned with the policy is reached over time.
Thanks for your qu
In any case this is too much traffic on the private mailing list.
I would understand Dennis' mail as a wake-up call how much it is
currently and that there is an urgent need to turn down the number of mails.
Marcus
Am 08/28/2015 11:58 PM, schrieb Phillip Rhodes:
So what, if anything, shoul
Am 08/29/2015 12:11 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The three patches for the "basic" part are probably easier to understand
separately:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst?r1=1583558&r2=1602195&path
12 matches
Mail list logo
