Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

On 03/12/2014 Simon Phipps wrote: I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from the iTunes store now he's seen what t

oooforum

For information: the old forum (oooforum.org) is currently flagged as follows "NOTICE: This domain name expired on 02/12/2014 and is pending renewal or deletion." This might be an appropriate time to renew/continue earlier discussions . -- Rory O'Farrell

[DEV, WEBDAV] About issue i125194 and file lock under Webdav

Hi all, it's some time I don't write to the list, but even though I last coded for AOO (was OOo then and some years have elapsed...) I continued to follow the project all along. Anyway, I'm writing about issue i125194 [1] because Davide Dozza discussed the problem with me and I decided to have a

Reporting broken download link

The .deb and RPM binaries of 4.1.1 OO aren't working. I've confirmed the links are broken on ChromiumOS, Ubuntu, and Windows 8.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

Am 12/03/2014 02:34 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming from the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

On 12/02/2014 05:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> >>> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server >>> level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He > tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his > real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from > the iTune

[CODE] old business...patches

The following query lists issues of type = PATCH https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=162879&namedcmd=PATCHES You will need to be a registered Bugzilla user to view it. It would be helpful for QA and dev team members to determine if the submitted patches are still r

Hunspell unmunching question

Hello! Around a week ago, Peter from England sent me an e-mail suggesting new words to be added to en_GB. One of them was "unsubscribe". Here is what appears in Proofing Tool GUI: The strange thing is that I tried the variants in Mozilla and OpenOffice and none of them was marked as a typo

Re: oooforum

Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup to clear all the issues, and fast-track to a conclusion and actions. On 12/4/14, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > For information: the old forum (oooforum.org) is currently flagged as > follows > > "NOTICE: This

RE: [DEV, WEBDAV] About issue i125194 and file lock under Webdav

It would be good to reconcile whatever that AOO code is attempting to do and the WebDAV locking model, specified now in RFC4918, . (There is a locking-related Errata item as well.) There is an extensive treatment of how much discovery and negotiation might b

Re: oooforum

Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying to help simply as a benefit to existing users. Edward, who owns the domain name, was cooperative a

Re: oooforum

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would >> suggest a public IRC meetup >> > > This is not an official resource of the project, so the project is trying > to help simply as a benefit

Wiki and Forum vms.

Hi all This is just an update to keep you all informed about whats happening with our vms. Having looked at the vms, I have identified a couple of severe issues: - We cannot update to ubuntu 14.04.1, that requires puppet3 (we currently use puppet2). - The diskspace on / of wiki is too restricted

opengrok.

Hi all. I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of opengrok. Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? rgds jan i

Re: oooforum

On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > > Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > >> Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would > >> suggest a public IRC meetup > >> > > > > This is not an official res

Re: oooforum

Is a rough estimate and yeah 100g will be a good 4 to 8 days. But a, I don't think it will come to 100g and b, the process will be between servers so it shouldn't be an issue. I could rent a vps with 100g for 4 days but then it would need additionally 4 more days to transfer to apache. If I put it

Re: oooforum

I could use people.apache.org a df shows me 1.2tb free Not sure if there is a quota for my user I could wget the whole site. On Dec 4, 2014 1:13 PM, "jan i" wrote: > On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti > > wrote: > > > >

Re: oooforum

Seems the domain already expire. On 12/4/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > I could use people.apache.org a df shows me 1.2tb free > Not sure if there is a quota for my user > I could wget the whole site. > On Dec 4, 2014 1:13 PM, "jan i" wrote: > >> On 4 December 2014 at 18:36, Alexandro Colorado

Re: Reporting broken download link

Is this still the case for you? At this moment, they seem fine for me. I'm using our main download page -- http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Sarik Jeram wrote: > The .deb and RPM binaries of 4.1.1 OO aren't working. I've confirmed the > links are bro

Fwd: [CODE] old business...patches -- link correction

-- Forwarded message -- From: Kay Schenk Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [CODE] old business...patches To: qa On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: > Well spotted by Regina. > > The correct link is > > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?c

Re: opengrok.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:10 AM, jan i wrote: > Hi all. > > I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of > opengrok. > > Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? > > rgds > jan i > Can't help but ... cool! Every project could use this capability. -- --

Re: oooforum

On 04/12/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote: Seems the domain already expire. This would not be an issue in itself. Yes, it would be good to preserve the old links, but preserving knowledge is better. So if we can get the dump and files from Ed we can setup the forum at Apache and give it a new U

Re: opengrok.

jan i wrote: Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? Not me, but the current OpenGrok for OpenOffice at http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/ is managed by committers, so they might be available to give you details, or even move it to Apache. I, for one, would fully sup

Re: oooforum

On 12/4/14, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/12/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> Seems the domain already expire. > > This would not be an issue in itself. Yes, it would be good to preserve > the old links, but preserving knowledge is better. So if we can get the > dump and files from Ed we can set

Re: oooforum

On 12/04/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Alexandro Colorado wrote: Unfortunately seems these matters went into private lists. I would suggest a public IRC meetup This is not an official resource of the project, so the projec

Re: oooforum

Well the next step would be to transfer this to apache and then do a collaborative cleanup. On Dec 4, 2014 6:16 PM, "Andrew Douglas Pitonyak" wrote: > > On 12/04/2014 12:36 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti >> wrote: >> >> Alexandro Colorado wro