Building OpenOffice revisited (again)

I would like to present some ideas about how to improve the building of OpenOffice. Maybe this can serve as a basis for a face-to-face discussion at FOSDEM. Makefiles in general and our build environment in particular have a declarative and an imperative part. In short dependencies are declared

update the wiki of https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Cpp/Tutorials/component_tutorial

hi, I have updated the wiki of https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Cpp/Tutorials/component_tutorial, if there are mistakes,you can modify it directly. thanks -- *mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com

Re: config error on Windows 7

Hi, On 17.01.2014 07:52, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 16.01.2014 18:28, jonasalfreds...@gmail.com wrote: I got hold of a copy of Visual Studio Express 2008. With the configure call above 'oowintool' was called. The Win SDK did not add the mentioned key to the registry, nor did Visual S

Re: Building OpenOffice revisited (again)

On 17 January 2014 09:26, Andre Fischer wrote: > I would like to present some ideas about how to improve the > building of OpenOffice. Maybe this can serve as a basis for a > face-to-face discussion at FOSDEM. > Quite a nice idea, its more or less the base we use in the capstone project. With t

[Bugzilla] Proposal: Further value for field "Version" - namely "pre 3.4.0"

Hi, during the review of issues (newly submitted ones and also critical ones) I observed the following: Sometimes it reveals that the described defect already occurs in OpenOffice versions which had been released before OpenOffice found its new home at Apache. Unfortunately, the available valu

Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

Hi Dev Problem when trying to download legacy version. So when I click download nothing happens, just go to the "Please contribute!" page. The I went to "select a mirror close to you" but when i cant download from any, just shows http or ftp or rsynce but when you

AOO 4.1 Feature Verification Test needs your help -- Call for volunteers!

Hi All, We have made some progress on the 4.1 Feature Verification Test (FVT) execution with help from Edwin, Maryna and Liu Ping and will get even more done with upcoming helping from Nadya and Simon. But we still have a lot of work to do. We still have 945 testcases to run. Completing these t

Re: Issues found when testing comments/annotations on test ranges - 1st batch

Oliver, thank you for the quick response, I will verify the fix in next buildbot build. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 16.01.2014 10:59, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 15.01.2014 14:33, Oliver-Rainer Wit

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:21:49 +0200 Lex Ridley wrote: > Hi Dev > > Problem when trying to download legacy version. So when I click download > nothing happens, just go to the "Please contribute!" page. The I went to > "select a mirror close to you" but when i cant download from any, just > show

Re: loadComponentFromURL - Solaris 11 OO 3.3

On 17/01/2014 00:29, Paul Gress wrote: > There is one person (Apostols Syropoulos) trying to compile the latest version 4.0, but having trouble. Then there are at least 2. I've tried and so far failed to compile 4.0. [I'm using self built 3.4.1] James. --

[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140117

Hi All, We started doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (1/13 - 1/17): *Test execution:* 1. New feature testing on comments/Annotations on text ranges - Ongoing Bugs found: (red one is critical) Bug 124030 - Failed to open ODT file exported from AOO with co

Re: [QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140117

Hi, Thanks for report. I have some comments/questions - see inline below. On 17.01.2014 13:27, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi All, We started doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (1/13 - 1/17): *Test execution:* 1. New feature testing on comments/Annotations on t

Re: Building on Windows 7

Same result when running cygwin as administrator. -- View this message in context: http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/Building-on-Windows-7-tp4657909p4657970.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: [Bugzilla] Proposal: Further value for field "Version" - namely "pre 3.4.0"

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > during the review of issues (newly submitted ones and also critical ones) I > observed the following: > Sometimes it reveals that the described defect already occurs in OpenOffice > versions which had been released before Ope

Re: Hello to the Apache Project Team

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Shari Bradstream wrote: > Good evening, > > I came across the Apache Open Office software and find it intriguing. > I like what I read so decided to invest a little time each week to work on > project materials in the areas that help is needed. > I am not a compute

Re: Introduction-Isaak Nate

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Ike Nate wrote: > Hello Apache OpenOffice Team, > > I would like to introduce myself. My name is Isaak Natenzon and I am from > New York, I found this e-mail through uTest, where I am a SQA Tester. I am > familiar with OpenOffice because I have used it in the past

FOSDEM smalltalk.

hi should we arrange some face to face discussions, potentially not in the dev room like andre f. I would like to discuss the build system, potentially as a forerunner to work shop. Who can/will lead a digital signing project (urgent) as more than half of the vm team is there, it might be good

FOSDEM travel reombursement.

Hi. not too sure what the status is, but better early then never. I will give 2 speaches at FOSDEM, and would like to claim the 200,- eur reimbursement (of course only to be paid after the presentations) rgds jan i

Re: Hello to the Apache Project Team

Hi Shari, Thanks for your volunteering to help, if you are interested in 4.1 testing and would like get started to do test execution and bug confirmation/verification, or join other test activities, please let me know, thanks! On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15,

Re: Building OpenOffice revisited (again)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > I would like to present some ideas about how to improve the > building of OpenOffice. Maybe this can serve as a basis for a > face-to-face discussion at FOSDEM. > > Makefiles in general and our build environment in particular have a > decl

RE: loadComponentFromURL - Solaris 11 OO 3.3

> > > There is one person (Apostols Syropoulos) trying to compile the > latest version 4.0, but having trouble. > > Then there are at least 2. I've tried and so far failed to compile 4.0. > [I'm using self built 3.4.1] > Hello, What compiler are you using? I used gcc 4.7.2 and now I have s

Re: [Bugzilla] Proposal: Further value for field "Version" - namely "pre 3.4.0"

Hi, On 17.01.2014 15:33, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, during the review of issues (newly submitted ones and also critical ones) I observed the following: Sometimes it reveals that the described defect already occurs in OpenOffice versions

Re: [Bugzilla] Proposal: Further value for field "Version" - namely "pre 3.4.0"

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: I would like to tag issues which occurs in pre 3.4.0 version appropriately This would be helpful for me too. Probably two new categories: - 3.3.0 or earlier - 3.4.0-beta This would allow to file all bugs appropriately. The latter category would be useful only for