Hi Oliver,
You have edited the old OOo3 version. There is the new version on
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step
Kind regards
Regina
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb:
Hi,
On 01.08.2013 15:15, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
Our current documenta
Hi,
On 07.08.2013 08:59, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Oliver,
You have edited the old OOo3 version. There is the new version on
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step
I have edited the AOO Windows build requirement wiki page [1] and the
AOO Windows step-b
Hi,
I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java
6 for AOO installation on Windows.
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
that it is hard to get an official JDK 1.5 (
I had the same exact problem. I'm running ubuntu 64bit 12.04 not on a
virtual machine. This is a completely fresh install of ubuntu. The steps
I've done to try and build are
cd to aoo-trunk/main
$ autconf
$ ./configure --with-dmake-url=
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.
On 6 August 2013 21:46, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> pootle experienced a mysql error, about an hour ago.
>
> I am looking at the problem.
>
Pootle server (translate-vm2.a.o) is up again, but will be slow today.
I will be running refresh_stat (optimize db tables) today, and sync_stores
(update PO fil
Hi Oliver,
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb:
Hi,
On 07.08.2013 08:59, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Oliver,
You have edited the old OOo3 version. There is the new version on
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step
I have edited the AOO Windows build require
On 06.08.2013 16:18, Rob Weir wrote:
> Or maybe the point you are missing is the distinction between a
> "quiet" approach and a "secret" approach. These are not the same
> thing. I'm not proposing secrecy. But one can be transparent
> without drawing unwanted attention to a request.
>
"Quiet
I'm deleting the quotes of the earlier discussion as it is not relevant to my
point here.
I have no experience of building with Java and care little about the security
holes, so I bow to the expertise of those who know better.
If changes are being made to the OpenOffice/Java interaction, woul
On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI wrote:
> On 6 August 2013 17:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/6/13 3:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
It is important that we don't fall in the "release and forget" trap,
i.e., "this bug was already known when 4.0 was released, s
On 8/7/13 10:01 AM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07.08.2013 08:59, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> Hi Oliver,
>>>
>>> You have edited the old OOo3 version. There is the new version on
>>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_G
On 7 August 2013 11:31, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/7/13 10:01 AM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 07.08.2013 08:59, Regina Henschel wrote:
> >>> Hi Oliver,
> >>>
> >>> You have edited the old OOo3 version. There is the new vers
On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI wrote:
> > On 6 August 2013 17:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >
> >> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/6/13 3:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >>>
> It is important that we don't fall in the "release and forget" trap,
Hi Oliver,
Am 07.08.2013 09:44, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java
6 for AOO installation on Windows.
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my work to update the AOO build environment for Win
Hi,
On 07.08.2013 12:13, Peter Eberlein wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Am 07.08.2013 09:44, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java
6 for AOO installation on Windows.
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my
Hello,
"Proposals for main track presentations should be submitted using Pentabarf:
https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/
Developer room proposals should be emailed to devro...@fosdem.org and be
as detailed as possible. In particular, coordinators should indicate
their affinity with the topic bei
On 7 August 2013 09:33, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I'm deleting the quotes of the earlier discussion as it is not relevant to my
> point here.
>
> I have no experience of building with Java and care little about the security
> holes, so I bow to the expertise of those who know better.
>
> If change
On 7 August 2013 12:51, sebb wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 09:33, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > I'm deleting the quotes of the earlier discussion as it is not relevant
> to my point here.
> >
> > I have no experience of building with Java and care little about the
> security holes, so I bow to the exper
On 7 August 2013 11:55, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 12:51, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 August 2013 09:33, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>> > I'm deleting the quotes of the earlier discussion as it is not relevant
>> to my point here.
>> >
>> > I have no experience of building with Java and care little abou
On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI wrote:
>>> On 6 August 2013 17:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/6/13 3:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> It is important that we don't fa
On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
> > On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI wrote:
> >>> On 6 August 2013 17:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >>>
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On 8/6/13 3:05 PM, And
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java 6
> for AOO installation on Windows.
> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
>
> On my work to update the AOO build environmen
On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
>>> On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>
On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI wrote:
> On 6 August 2013 17:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java 6
> > for AOO installation on Windows.
> > Important note for discussion: it is all about p
On 7 August 2013 13:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
> > On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
> >>> On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>>
> On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI wrote:
> > On 6 August 2013 17:1
On 7 August 2013 12:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 6 August 2013 17:15, Andre
On 7 August 2013 14:04, sebb wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 12:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
> >> On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On 8/6/13 6:4
I am trying to download the AOO SDKs, but there is an error on this page
in your javascript when using IE8 (my company's policy, and I have no
admin rights to install an alternative). The error is in
download_other.js: Object doesn't support this property or method (line
96, character 2 which I bel
Hi,
sorry for top-posting:
But please use the new thread for the discussion of dropping Java 5 and
Java 6 support for Windows.
Otherwise, it may happen that your arguement were lost for this discussion.
Thanks in advance,
Oliver.
On 07.08.2013 12:59, sebb wrote:
On 7 August 2013 11:55, janI
On 7 August 2013 14:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and
> Java 6
> > > for AOO installati
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Jennings, Rory
wrote:
> I am trying to download the AOO SDKs, but there is an error on this page
> in your javascript when using IE8 (my company's policy, and I have no
> admin rights to install an alternative). The error is in
> download_other.js: Object doesn't su
On 7 August 2013 13:47, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 14:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support
On 8/7/13 2:04 PM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 13:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
>>> On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>
On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI
I pull up this issue.
The error occurs again since two weeks.
>For interested look at:
>INFRA-6097 which request mysql optimization and
>INFRA-6098 which request httpd/ats/php optimization
>They are assigned to me, but when I do it, I need somebody to help
>test...any volunteers ?
On 8/7/13 2:09 PM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 14:04, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 August 2013 12:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote:
>> On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt
Good day
In Calc spreadsheet, on the Data menu with the standard filter the
calculations give wrong results
Sincerely,
Aldo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
2013/8/7 FR web forum
> I pull up this issue.
> The error occurs again since two weeks.
>
>
Today, forums alternate between error 1040 and being slower than a snail.
It is not possible to access them right now.
Regards
Ricardo
> >For interested look at:
>
> >INFRA-6097 which request mysql opt
Good day too,
Maybe you must provide a sample file to show the problem?
- Mail original -
De: "Aldo"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Août 2013 16:59:03
Objet: Bug
Good day
In Calc spreadsheet, on the Data menu with the standard filter the
calculations give wrong result
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:47 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 14:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to discuss here, if we
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Edward Kuang wrote:
> I had the same exact problem. I'm running ubuntu 64bit 12.04 not on a
> virtual machine. This is a completely fresh install of ubuntu. The steps
> I've done to try and build are
>
> cd to aoo-trunk/main
> $ autconf
> $ ./configure --with-dmak
Thanks for your help! It seems that I have build it successfully by
following
the same steps you used. And thanks Kay for telling me to check this url
again so I could fix the epm error.
Although I can build AOO without errors, I can't install it successfully.
Nothing wrong happened when processing
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
that it is hard to get an official JDK 1.5 (Java 5) or JDK 1.6 (Java 6)
for Windows. Thus, I decided to go with JDK 1.7. The resul
I download page does not seem to be displaying the correct information. I am
looking to download the latest version 4.0 source. Can someone point me in the
right direction. I am looking for the tarball.
http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html#source
Raymond
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> I download page does not seem to be displaying the correct information. I am
> looking to download the latest version 4.0 source. Can someone point me in
> the right direction. I am looking for the tarball.
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/d
I can confirm the same error
$ sudo dpkg -i
unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/desktop-integration/openoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0-9702_all.deb
Selecting previously unselected package openoffice-debian-menus.
(Reading database ... 193152 files and directories currently installed
I think the Linux 32 bots just need some cleanup - the win bots were
having issues related to disk space, but that's cleaned up now.
looking to get all the bots green and add a few new ones (fbsd and
CentOS soon)
A.
On 8/6/2013 10:36 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
at least my 'pat
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 11:00:16 -0700
Edward Kuang wrote:
> I can confirm the same error
>
> $ sudo dpkg -i
> unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/desktop-integration/openoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0-9702_all.deb
>
> Selecting previously unselected package openoffice-debian-menus.
>
On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
>> On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
>> that it is hard to get an official JDK 1.5 (Java 5) or JDK 1.6 (Java 6
On 7 August 2013 17:28, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
> 2013/8/7 FR web forum
>
> > I pull up this issue.
> > The error occurs again since two weeks.
> >
> >
> Today, forums alternate between error 1040 and being slower than a snail.
> It is not possible to access them right now.
>
I think you have so
Thanks. Removing libreoffice did the job.
On 08/07/2013 11:13 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 11:00:16 -0700
Edward Kuang wrote:
I can confirm the same error
$ sudo dpkg -i
unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/desktop-integration/openoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0-9
Rob,
Thanks for the response. I am looking for the 4.0 code. I clicked the link, but
it is not going anywhere. Does it work for you?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:51 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Steele, Raymond
Cc
On 7 August 2013 16:44, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/7/13 2:09 PM, janI wrote:
> > On 7 August 2013 14:04, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 7 August 2013 12:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On 8/7/13 11:47
Hi at all
Bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122881
The bug says, that the application icon is not visible on Mac OS X
10.5.8. I investegate in this bug, and found out, that the actual
main.icns is not compatible with Mac OS X 10.5.8. 10.6 and heighter
works find.
I created
Am 08/07/2013 08:52 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Hi at all
Bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122881
The bug says, that the application icon is not visible on Mac OS X
10.5.8. I investegate in this bug, and found out, that the actual
main.icns is not compatible with Mac OS X 10.
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 20:35:30 +0200
janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 17:28, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
>
> > 2013/8/7 FR web forum
> >
> > > I pull up this issue.
> > > The error occurs again since two weeks.
> > >
> > >
> > Today, forums alternate between error 1040 and being slower than a snail.
>
Am 08/07/2013 08:43 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond:
Rob,
Thanks for the response. I am looking for the 4.0 code. I clicked the link, but
it is not going anywhere. Does it work for you?
Yes, for me all 3 links are working, also the links for the signature
and hash files.
Do you get any error m
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 08/07/2013 08:43 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond:
>
>> Rob,
>>
>> Thanks for the response. I am looking for the 4.0 code. I clicked the
>> link, but it is not going anywhere. Does it work for you?
>
>
> Yes, for me all 3 links are working, also
Am 07.08.13 21:03, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/07/2013 08:52 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Hi at all
Bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122881
The bug says, that the application icon is not visible on Mac OS X
10.5.8. I investegate in this bug, and found out, that the actual
mai
Am 07.08.13 21:04, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 20:35:30 +0200
janI wrote:
On 7 August 2013 17:28, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
2013/8/7 FR web forum
I pull up this issue.
The error occurs again since two weeks.
Today, forums alternate between error 1040 and being slower than
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 15:07:03 -0400
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> > Am 08/07/2013 08:43 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond:
> >
> >> Rob,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the response. I am looking for the 4.0 code. I clicked the
> >> link, but it is not going anywhere. Does
Am 08/07/2013 02:21 PM, schrieb Jennings, Rory:
I am trying to download the AOO SDKs, but there is an error on this page
in your javascript when using IE8 (my company's policy, and I have no
admin rights to install an alternative). The error is in
download_other.js: Object doesn't support this pr
On 7 August 2013 21:14, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Am 07.08.13 21:04, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 20:35:30 +0200
>> janI wrote:
>>
>> On 7 August 2013 17:28, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/8/7 FR web forum
I pull up this issue.
> The error occurs again
Thanks, that works. I'm not sure about the what is going on with my browser
(Firefox), but when I clicked the other links, the page would just refresh.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 12:05 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache
3rd try - hope it works -
Original Message
*Subject: *[Website]
*Date: *Wed, 07 Aug 2013 07:18:40 -0700
*From: *candidcactus
*To: *dev@openoffice.apache.org
Things must be tough for spam. I received this message on my email being
rejected:
Delivery to the following rec
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:43 PM, candidcactus wrote:
>
> 3rd try - hope it works -
>
This list strips all image attachments. The best thing to do in this case
is to use our issue reporting mechanism, Bugzilla, to file a bug. You are
allowed to attach images with your issue.
BZ link:
https://iss
[top posting]
never mind on this. It seems only the msweet.org epm url is currently
working correctly for building at the moment.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> It seems we have two different urls in our Building Guides for epm.
>
> The one listed on this page:
> (1)
> http:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> >
> >> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
> >> On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
> >> that it is
i did the update from 3 and now i can't find any of my files,,what
can i do to get them back?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> My arguements for a drop of the Java 5 and Java 6 support on Windows are:
> - JRE 5 is quite old and no longer officially available
> - JRE 6 is no longer officially available
> - JRE 6 has certain security risks and the corresponding
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Peter Eberlein
wrote:
>
> If Java 6 has been dropped and Java 7 wasn't found on the system, wouldn't
> it be better to replace the general MsgBox "There was no Java environment
> found" by "Java 7 or higher wasn't found"?
> Otherwise people who know that they have 1
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:47 AM, janI wrote:
> question is do we also want to force our customers
> to use java 1.7 ?
Yes :) On Windows Java 6 is EOL'd.
On Linux, most distros ship OpenJDK7 already which is Java 1.7
One of the few remaining OpenJDK6 holdouts announced the switch to OpenJDK7
htt
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
>
>> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>> >
>> >> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
>> >> On my work to update the AO
On Aug 7, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Important note for discussion: it is all ab
On 8/7/13 9:10 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Am 07.08.13 21:03, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>> Am 08/07/2013 08:52 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
>>> Hi at all
>>>
>>> Bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122881
>>>
>>> The bug says, that the application icon is not visible on Mac OS X
>>> 10.
On 8/7/13 8:44 PM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 16:44, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 8/7/13 2:09 PM, janI wrote:
>>> On 7 August 2013 14:04, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 7 August 2013 12:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt w
Hi Jürgen, *
Am 08.08.13 07:51, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 8/7/13 9:10 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 07.08.13 21:03, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/07/2013 08:52 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Hi at all
Bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122881
The bug says, that the application
75 matches
Mail list logo
