On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Kay,
> >>
> >> I already wrote at 29.06.2013 12:50 under
> >>
> >> Re: [RELEASE]: propose new snapshot build based on rev.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>
>> Hello Kay,
>>
>> I already wrote at 29.06.2013 12:50 under
>>
>> Re: [RELEASE]: propose new snapshot build based on rev. 1496831
>>
>> I did a test in a clean virtualbox under Debian Wheez
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello Kay,
>
> I already wrote at 29.06.2013 12:50 under
>
> Re: [RELEASE]: propose new snapshot build based on rev. 1496831
>
> I did a test in a clean virtualbox under Debian Wheezy 32 bit.
> First I installed AOO 3.4.1 without problems
> The
Hello Kay,
I already wrote at 29.06.2013 12:50 under
Re: [RELEASE]: propose new snapshot build based on rev. 1496831
I did a test in a clean virtualbox under Debian Wheezy 32 bit.
First I installed AOO 3.4.1 without problems
Then I installed the developer Snapshot from 2013-06-27 with dpkg -i *.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 2013-07-14, at 10:37 , Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 12:53:13 +0200
> > Hagar Delest wrote:
> >
> >> I installed the RC on top of a dev version and had to use the
> --force-all parameter with dpkg (else broken pi
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> I installed the RC on top of a dev version and had to use the --force-all
> parameter with dpkg (else broken pipe error message). Rather strange.
>
This happened because build numbers were the same. The svn revisions were
different, but actu
On 2013-07-14, at 10:37 , Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 12:53:13 +0200
> Hagar Delest wrote:
>
>> I installed the RC on top of a dev version and had to use the --force-all
>> parameter with dpkg (else broken pipe error message). Rather strange.
>>
>> I tried the import of my ol
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 12:53:13 +0200
Hagar Delest wrote:
> I installed the RC on top of a dev version and had to use the --force-all
> parameter with dpkg (else broken pipe error message). Rather strange.
>
> I tried the import of my old 3.4 profile and it worked rather well. Of course
> the too
I installed the RC on top of a dev version and had to use the --force-all
parameter with dpkg (else broken pipe error message). Rather strange.
I tried the import of my old 3.4 profile and it worked rather well. Of course
the toolbars of my extensions were disabled but I could access the macros
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
> 2013/7/14 Kay Schenk
>
> > Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how
> that
> > went if you did.
> >
> > Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
> >
>
> That's highly distro dependant
2013/7/14 Kay Schenk
> Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how that
> went if you did.
>
> Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
>
That's highly distro dependant: on openSUSE both can live side by side
without problems, but AFAIK on *bun
There was a bug when LO released the first version which collide with older
openoffice applications, they fix that on some versions ahead.
OpenOffice.org version by then was 3.4 RC which never really got released
officially. So I guess it will has to do with the LO version as well. LO
first version
Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how that
went if you did.
Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
Thanks.
--
-
MzK
Success is falling ni
13 matches
Mail list logo
