Hi OpenOffice Guru's,
We have tried to open file using open office but all the time it fails
saying the file .39832938.doc does not exist but we could see all the files
getting created at the specifed temp location. We came to know that there
is some issue with Openoffice with NFS systems on file
The 3.3.0 Releases were all by Oracle on January 18, 2011.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond [mailto:raymond.ste...@lmco.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 01:15 PM
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java
Thanks and yes, no help!
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Am 07/18/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond
. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:08 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice. (There
was an out-of-cycle security fix, but
.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:08 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice. (There
was
ssage-
From: Steele, Raymond [mailto:raymond.ste...@lmco.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:29 PM
To: Andrea Pescetti; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton; 'Don'
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Who completed the OpenOffice 3.3 Solaris x86 build? It seem
Who completed the OpenOffice 3.3 Solaris x86 build? It seems that we could
easily add the new vendor to the few files listed here, then recompile. I am
sure someone already has the environment set up considering the code was
compiled for Solaris x86 in the past. This could then become a
Hi Raymond,
On 08.07.2013 21:31, Steele, Raymond wrote:
Thanks for the response. I've been informed by Nicolas Christoper of Adfinis
Sygroup that the Solaris x86 port was not completed, but could be completed at
cost. I am not sure where my organization will go from here. We've been using
the
st to port OpenOffice to Solaris x86 ourselves, but we
are considering our options. Advice?
Raymond
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 12:21 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.
On 06.07.2013 17:12, Steele, Raymond wrote:
Thank you for the reply. What shall I do about 3.3 not being supported? There
is not a OpenOffice 3.4 available for Solaris 10 x86 under the ASF.
As you know our friends at Adfinis Sygroup provided a Solaris-X86 build
of AOO 3.4.0
https://adfini
On 06/07/2013 Steele, Raymond wrote:
What shall I do about 3.3 not being
supported? There is not a OpenOffice 3.4 available for Solaris 10
x86 under the ASF.
Third parties may be able to offer extended support, or to put the
necessary work in place (contributing code upstream, following the m
@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton; 'Don'; Steele, Raymond
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
On 03/07/2013 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> 2. OpenOffice.org, in part of its detection of available JREs, may be
> looking for Sun as the provider. It might not recognize
On 03/07/2013 18:58, Steele, Raymond wrote:
Hello,
We are currently running Solaris x86 with OpenOffice 3.3. We have recently be
directed to upgrade our systems to Java 7, but cannot seem to get Java 7 to
work correctly with OpenOffice version 3.3.
I think it needs to at least be
On 03/07/2013 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
2. OpenOffice.org, in part of its detection of available JREs, may be
looking for Sun as the provider. It might not recognize JREs that
now have Oracle identified as the provider.
This used to be a problem (in general, not Solaris-specific) for JREs
tha
3.3 does not acknowledge the Java 7
JRE?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:40 PM
To: 'dennis.hamil...@acm.org'; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: 'Don'
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Thanks for the r
[mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:37 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: 'Don'; Steele, Raymond
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
There are some prospective problems with OpenOffice.org 3.3 that need to be
ruled-out/verified:
1. OpenOffice.o
.
-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond [mailto:raymond.ste...@lmco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 12:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; us...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
The issue I am having is OpenOffice will not accept the Java 7 JRE via
Tool
uot;
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 10:59 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; us...@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: 'nicolas.christe...@adfinis-sygroup.ch'
Subject: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Hello,
We are currently running Solaris x86 with OpenOffice 3.3. We have recentl
Hello,
We are currently running Solaris x86 with OpenOffice 3.3. We have recently be
directed to upgrade our systems to Java 7, but cannot seem to get Java 7 to
work correctly with OpenOffice version 3.3. I understand there is a company
(Adfinis SyGroup AG) that is porting OpenOffice to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 06:59:02 +0100
Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
> jerome strand wrote:
>
> > I recently began trying to experiment with openoffice 3.3 and I want to say
> > it's AWESOME! However! There are some features I'
On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
jerome strand wrote:
> I recently began trying to experiment with openoffice 3.3 and I want to say
> it's AWESOME! However! There are some features I'd like to have that it
> doesn't offer. The fontwork gallery is great bu
I recently began trying to experiment with openoffice 3.3 and I want to say
it's AWESOME! However! There are some features I'd like to have that it doesn't
offer. The fontwork gallery is great but some of the font works cannot be
changed as to the solid color I want to use. Als
22 matches
Mail list logo
