Guy Waterval wrote:
I do not know if such a collaboration is allowed
by Apache
No problem. Apache won't pay developers directly, but it doesn't forbid
that developers are paid of course! So whoever is the sponsor, there is
no problem as long as the code is under the Apache License version 2 a
Hi Keith,
2017-10-14 5:52 GMT+02:00 Keith N. McKenna :
[...]
What is relevant is that having it
> functional would be a good enhancement to the product as well as
> provicing the potential of benefit to the project.
>
I entirely agree with your position an I have a suggestion.
Why not to try a
>Do we have a bug # for this longstanding issue? We still advertise this
>feature but it is not working since 4.1.0 (?).
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=wikipublisher
But none specific to this problem
-
To unsub
On 10/13/2017 2:43 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 06.10.2017 um 03:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
>
>> I think I understand what is going wrong with WikiPublisher on Windows.
>> The FreeBSD port sets the --with-system-apache-commons=yes, and lists
>> the all the commons-*.jar files as dependencies, so whe
Am 06.10.2017 um 03:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I think I understand what is going wrong with WikiPublisher on Windows.
> The FreeBSD port sets the --with-system-apache-commons=yes, and lists
> the all the commons-*.jar files as dependencies, so when AOO is
> installed on a machine, the commons-*.jar
On 4 Oct, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 9/30/2017 8:42
On 4 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 4 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On 10/4/2017 11:49 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 04.10.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 9/30/2017 8:42 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel
