n't mind the additional workload if it helps our community.
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Cast your vote:
>> [X] CentOS7
>> [ ] Ubuntu 14.04
>> [ ] Something else:
>
> CentOS 7 builds wil
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
AppImage and Snap packages would be the best, as those are multi-distro,
portable apps, do desktop integration, user friendly, standard
uninstallation, etc.
I'm singling this out as this is a different discussion, related to how
we package rather than how we build. I mu
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Cast your vote:
[X] CentOS7
[ ] Ubuntu 14.04
[ ] Something else:
CentOS 7 builds will run under Ubuntu 13.x too. While CentOS 7 32-bit
would be unsupported, the 64-bit version would receive maintenance until
2024; Ubuntu 14.04, instead, is already
On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> CentOS7: glibc 2.17
> Ubuntu 14.04: glibc 2.19
>
> Since CentOS7 emulates the "super stable" worldview of RHEL, the
> CentOS7 version will likely always be the older one.
In that case I think a Ubuntu build is un
version is
>>> not officially supported. This means that for our
>>> 32bit builds we are using an unsupported platform.
>>> Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead baseline
>>> Ubuntu 14.04, which is both 64 and
Ubuntu 14.04, which is both 64 and 32bit as well as
both under LTS.
So the question is: CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04?
CentOS 7 32-bit is supported as an offical platform:
https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product
Cast your vote:
[ ] CentOS7
[ ] Ubuntu 14.04
CentOS7: glibc 2.17
Ubuntu 14.04: glibc 2.19
Since CentOS7 emulates the "super stable" worldview of RHEL, the CentOS7
version will likely always be the older one.
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 1:02 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> History: For pre
atform.
>> Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead baseline
>> Ubuntu 14.04, which is both 64 and 32bit as well as
>> both under LTS.
>> So the question is: CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04?
>
> CentOS 7 32-bit is supported as
ainly due to gstreamer 1.0).
>
> Discussion: The issue w/ CentOS7 is that the 32bit version is
> not officially supported. This means that for our
> 32bit builds we are using an unsupported platform.
> Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead baseline
).
Discussion: The issue w/ CentOS7 is that the 32bit version is
not officially supported. This means that for our
32bit builds we are using an unsupported platform.
Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead baseline
Ubuntu 14.04, which is both 64
Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead baseline
>> Ubuntu 14.04, which is both 64 and 32bit as well as
>> both under LTS.
>>
>> So the question is: CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04?
>
> What are the gcc/glibc versions of both?
streamer 1.0).
>
> Discussion: The issue w/ CentOS7 is that the 32bit version is
> not officially supported. This means that for our
> 32bit builds we are using an unsupported platform.
> Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead baseline
> Ubun
OS7 (mainly due to gstreamer 1.0).
>
> Discussion: The issue w/ CentOS7 is that the 32bit version is
>not officially supported. This means that for our
>32bit builds we are using an unsupported platform.
>Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead b
32bit version is
not officially supported. This means that for our
32bit builds we are using an unsupported platform.
Instead of using CentOS7, we could instead baseline
Ubuntu 14.04, which is both 64 and 32bit as well as
both under LTS
> On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
>> Playing around w/ building 4.1.5 and 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 14.04...
>> Will update the wiki as required (already found 2 dependencies
>> we were missing)
>
> This is good news, as th
Hi Jim,
Playing around w/ building 4.1.5 and 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 14.04...
Will update the wiki as required (already found 2 dependencies
we were missing)
This is good news, as this is the platform used by travis-ci:
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/reference/overview/
Any chance you could get to
Playing around w/ building 4.1.5 and 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 14.04...
Will update the wiki as required (already found 2 dependencies
we were missing)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands
Andrea Pescetti has granted Andrea Pescetti
's request for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 124712: Build broken on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 (undefined reference to
__cxa_atexit)
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124712
--- Comment #28 from Andrea Pescetti ---
Now committed to AOO41
Andrea Pescetti has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 124712: Build broken on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 (undefined reference to
__cxa_atexit)
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124712
--- Comment #27 from Andrea Pescetti ---
As discussed: this is needed for a clean build on Ubuntu 14.04
Thanks :)
2015-04-04 21:30 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
> On 28/03/2015 Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
>
>> where can one apply for a wiki account?
>>
>
> Here! I've just created one for you. You will receive a temporary password
> in a few minutes.
>
> Note that the 12.04 section in the page you mentio
On 28/03/2015 Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
where can one apply for a wiki account?
Here! I've just created one for you. You will receive a temporary
password in a few minutes.
Note that the 12.04 section in the page you mentioned
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/
at http://wiki.openoffice.org you sign in, then look for create account and
then msg your nick to the list in order to be validated (I think).
Validation process has changed through the years.
The guide was fixed anyway.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Driss Ben Zoubeir
wrote:
> where can one
where can one apply for a wiki account?
2015-03-28 2:13 GMT+01:00 Alexandro Colorado :
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 03/27/2015 02:38 PM, Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think I the 2nd install command under
> > >
> >
> https://wiki.openo
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 03/27/2015 02:38 PM, Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I the 2nd install command under
> >
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_14.04
> > is not up to date.
> > should th
On 03/27/2015 02:38 PM, Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I the 2nd install command under
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_14.04
> is not up to date.
> should the actual command looks like the following:
>
> sudo dpkg -i
> unxlngx
Hi,
I think I the 2nd install command under
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_14.04
is not up to date.
should the actual command looks like the following:
sudo dpkg -i
unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/desktop-integration/op
Hi Together,
After successfull Build, I tried to run the installation (I dont really
know what the 2nd installation command exactly do)
the first installation command run successfully :
sudo dpkg -i unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US/DEBS/*.deb
After running the 2nd command:
sudo
On 04/07/14 12:53, Michal Hriň wrote:
>
>
> Dňa 04.07.2014 12:47, Michal Hriň wrote / napísal(a):
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to build release 4.1.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 and Issue 124712 appears
>> to me.
>> I stupidly tried to avoid this issue with building release
Dňa 04.07.2014 12:47, Michal Hriň wrote / napísal(a):
Hi,
I tried to build release 4.1.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 and Issue 124712 appears
to me.
I stupidly tried to avoid this issue with building release for LLVM,
replacing gcc command with llvm-gcc in build scripts.
I have some questions:
- is
Hi,
I tried to build release 4.1.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 and Issue 124712 appears
to me.
I stupidly tried to avoid this issue with building release for LLVM,
replacing gcc command with llvm-gcc in build scripts.
I have some questions:
- is possible build for example only module Writer, only
30 matches
Mail list logo
