Am 18.04.20 um 22:58 schrieb B. Ruth Deerfield:
Unsure what email address I was using:
p...@earthlink.net
brdfri...@icloud.com
bruthdeerfi...@gmail.com
deerborn.r...@gmail.com
I've checked all mail addresses but haven't found an user account; even
not disabled.
When you have double-checked y
Unsure what email address I was using:
p...@earthlink.net
brdfri...@icloud.com
bruthdeerfi...@gmail.com
deerborn.r...@gmail.com
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2020, at 3:47 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 18.04.20 um 11:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 12.04.20 um 19:25 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 12.
Hi Marcus,
Am 18.04.20 um 12:47 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 18.04.20 um 11:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 12.04.20 um 19:25 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 12.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
I would +1 to accounts upon request.
>>>
>>> OK, this was not an option I was thinking about as it would instal
Am 18.04.20 um 11:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 12.04.20 um 19:25 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
I would +1 to accounts upon request.
OK, this was not an option I was thinking about as it would install a
hurdle for the users. ;-)
However, for the moment this could
Hi Pedro,
Am 18.04.20 um 11:54 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Mathias
>
>> Are existing users (non LDAP) still able to log in?
> I am able to log in and use Bugzilla as usual (I have no idea what LDAP is,
> but I think I don't have it?)
Thanks (also to David)!
LDAP [1] is when you can log in with you
Hi Mathias
> Are existing users (non LDAP) still able to log in?
I am able to log in and use Bugzilla as usual (I have no idea what LDAP is, but
I think I don't have it?)
Regards,
Pedro
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
On 18/4/20 7:03 pm, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Am 12.04.20 um 19:25 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
I would +1 to accounts upon request.
OK, this was not an option I was thinking about as it would install a
hurdle for the users. ;-)
However, for the moment
Hi Marcus,
Am 12.04.20 um 19:25 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 12.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> I would +1 to accounts upon request.
>
> OK, this was not an option I was thinking about as it would install a
> hurdle for the users. ;-)
>
> However, for the moment this could be an valueable option, s
Am 12.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
I would +1 to accounts upon request.
OK, this was not an option I was thinking about as it would install a
hurdle for the users. ;-)
However, for the moment this could be an valueable option, so I've
disabled the self-registration feature in BZ.
W
I would +1 to accounts upon request.
Best regards,
Carl
On 4/12/20 6:05 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
since we use it as developer tool only, I agree.
Am 12.04.20 um 12:02 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Marcus,
Am 10.04.20 um 22:38 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.04.20 um 19:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
https
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 12:05:17 +0200
Peter Kovacs wrote:
> since we use it as developer tool only, I agree.
>
> Am 12.04.20 um 12:02 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Hi Marcus,
> >
> > Am 10.04.20 um 22:38 schrieb Marcus:
> >> Am 10.04.20 um 19:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >>> https://bz.apache.org/o
since we use it as developer tool only, I agree.
Am 12.04.20 um 12:02 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Marcus,
Am 10.04.20 um 22:38 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.04.20 um 19:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=17086
Is there anything we can do about this?
At least we sh
Hi Marcus,
Am 10.04.20 um 22:38 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10.04.20 um 19:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=17086
>>
>> Is there anything we can do about this?
>>
>> At least we should block these users...
>
> I've disabled all these user accounts.
>
> But IMHO the
Am 10.04.20 um 19:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=17086
Is there anything we can do about this?
At least we should block these users...
I've disabled all these user accounts.
But IMHO there is nothing else we can do. Even with a capture it's not
impossi
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=17086
Is there anything we can do about this?
At least we should block these users...
Regards,
Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
15 matches
Mail list logo