On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:52 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> Hello Damjan, All,
>
> I get reproducible crashes on trunk, built under Linux.
>
> More below.
>
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2025 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Reverting only the changes to lngreg.cxx also completely
Hi Matthias
> On 06/11/2025 9:57 PM WEST Matthias Seidel wrote:
> > Crashes with all PPT files I opened (but not with PPTX)
>
> OK, but that is an old bug, isn't it?
>
> So hopefully we have no further regressions?
It is so old I had forgotten about it :(
I could not find any other issues.
B
Hi Pedro,
Am 11.06.25 um 15:23 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Hi Matthias
Crashes with all PPT files I opened (but not with PPTX)
OK, but that is an old bug, isn't it?
So hopefully we have no further regressions?
Regards,
Matthias
Best.
Pedro
On 06/10/2025 5:15 PM WEST Matthias Seidel wrote
Hello Damjan, All,
I get reproducible crashes on trunk, built under Linux.
More below.
On Sun, Jun 08, 2025 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
[...]
> Reverting only the changes to lngreg.cxx also completely fixed the test
> crashes, which tells us that the regression is in this simp
Hi Matthias
Crashes with all PPT files I opened (but not with PPTX)
Best.
Pedro
> On 06/10/2025 5:15 PM WEST Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded new Windows builds for AOO42X:
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18cd7sMdBEthJ_jNgxliJnX57OuJeYMDR
>
> Please tes
Hi all,
I just uploaded new Windows builds for AOO42X:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18cd7sMdBEthJ_jNgxliJnX57OuJeYMDR
Please test and provide feedback.
Thanks!
Matthias
Am 10.06.25 um 13:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Damjan,
For AOO42X I have reverted #1890034 and cherry-picked
Hi Damjan,
For AOO42X I have reverted #1890034 and cherry-picked your last 4
commits and I don't see any problem now.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Matthias
Am 08.06.25 um 12:25 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 9:18 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 2:01 PM
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 9:18 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 2:01 PM Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Damjan,
>>
>> Am 07.06.25 um 13:47 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:32 PM Matthias Seidel <
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi
On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 2:01 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Am 07.06.25 um 13:47 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:32 PM Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Damjan,
> >>
> >> Am 06.06.25 um 20:15 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> >>> On
Hi Damjan,
Am 07.06.25 um 13:47 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:32 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Am 06.06.25 um 20:15 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 7:55 PM Matthias Seidel <
matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
wrote:
Hi Arrigo, Damjan,
Am 05.06.25 u
On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:32 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> Am 06.06.25 um 20:15 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 7:55 PM Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Arrigo, Damjan,
> >>
> >> Am 05.06.25 um 22:45 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
Hi Damjan,
Am 06.06.25 um 20:15 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 7:55 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
Hi Arrigo, Damjan,
Am 05.06.25 um 22:45 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
Hello All,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 10:33:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Damjan,
That sounds really goo
On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 7:55 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi Arrigo, Damjan,
>
> Am 05.06.25 um 22:45 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 10:33:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Damjan,
> >>
> >> That sounds really good!
> > Yes! It makes the code e
Hi Arrigo, Damjan,
Am 05.06.25 um 22:45 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
Hello All,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 10:33:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Damjan,
That sounds really good!
Yes! It makes the code easier to read, and getting rid of outdated
constructs is A Good Thing.
I would love to
Hello All,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 10:33:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> That sounds really good!
Yes! It makes the code easier to read, and getting rid of outdated
constructs is A Good Thing.
> I would love to join, but I (still) don't understand enough of it...
>
> Would
Hi Damjan,
That sounds really good!
I would love to join, but I (still) don't understand enough of it...
Would that be something to cherry-pick for AOO42X?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 05.06.25 um 19:33 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Hi
As is documented in our development guide (
https://wiki.openof
Hi
As is documented in our development guide (
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUNO/Component_Context),
OpenOffice has 2 APIs for factories for creating components, the older
service manager (XMultiServiceFactory) and the newer component context
(XComponentContext and its
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:33 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> As is documented in our development guide (
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUNO/Component_Context),
> OpenOffice has 2 APIs for factories for creating components, the older
> service manager (XMultiServic
18 matches
Mail list logo
