Hello,
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 10:22 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: [discussion] Release process
I don't want to interfere here, but I want to say the following:
> We have said we want to make a Release once a year and ...
pache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127805
AOO is incompatible with FreeType 2.8 at the moment.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> I suggest we burry the plan in making a big jump to 4.2.0 in a single
> Jump. Instead we make a create a release process that does not get
> stuck by development as lo
to put also more functional code and feature
updates in. I would like to keep the 4.1.6 release as narrow as it is now.
I suggest we burry the plan in making a big jump to 4.2.0 in a single
Jump. Instead we make a create a release process that does not get stuck
by development as long as there
Am 02.08.2017 um 15:14 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Reminder: Please add the steps that were taken to get Jim able to grant
release blocker for 4.1.4 to the "How to Cook a Release" page at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
done :-)
Marcus
-
Reminder: Please add the steps that were taken to get Jim able to grant
release blocker for 4.1.4 to the "How to Cook a Release" page at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
-
To unsubscri
I can confirm that opening Open Office today, without going into Tools or
other, I automatically received after about a minute the notification of
the new update available for version 4.1.3.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Marcus wrote:
>
>> You may want to review the t
Marcus wrote:
You may want to review the text as there are some typos in the last
sentence. ;-)
Thanks, there were some copy/paste issues. Keith already fixed the text
a bit, and I've now edited it again. By the way, translators might want
to update their localized version (they should have r
Am 10/17/2016 11:16 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 15/10/2016 Marcus wrote:
Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Pedro wrote:
Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" ...
The change to the update script is usually done several days af
On 15/10/2016 Marcus wrote:
Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Pedro wrote:
Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" ...
The change to the update script is usually done several days after...
I plan to update script data during the we
Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Pedro wrote:
Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date"
I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the
update script is usually done several days after the formal Release
announc
On 14-10-2016 08:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Pedro wrote:
Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date"
I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the
update script is usually done several days after the formal Release
announceme
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Pedro wrote:
Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date"
I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the
update script is usually done several days after the formal Release
announcement so as to minimize the load on the mirrors.
Pedro wrote:
> One last step needed: update the version number somewhere so that
> current OpenOffice users are warned that a new version is available.
> Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date"
>
> Thank you all for keeping the project alive.
I have added the your comment to
One last step needed: update the version number somewhere so that
current OpenOffice users are warned that a new version is available.
Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date"
Thank you all for keeping the project alive.
On 12/10/2016 22:49, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
First,
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> Can you restore my space admin privileges on the Cwiki. I had removed
>> all but my basic privileges.
>
> Sure! I've now given you all permissions I could assign. I hope this is
> enough; if not, we must contact Infra (but it seems that I could a
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Can you restore my space admin privileges on the Cwiki. I had removed
all but my basic privileges.
Sure! I've now given you all permissions I could assign. I hope this is
enough; if not, we must contact Infra (but it seems that I could assign
the space admin permission
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'm thinking of creating "How to cook a release" as a child page under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Releases, but
given
my inability to delete pages I would like to get opinions first.
>
> You can now del
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>>> First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
>>> conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'm thinking of creating "How to cook a release" as a child page under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Releases, but given
my inability to delete pages I would like to get opinions first.
You can now delete pages. and in general, if people do not ha
On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
drink after work.
Now back to work :-)
At this moment, I hope everyo
Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
drink after work.
Now back to work :-)
At this moment, I hope everyone remembers exactly what they did, wh
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
drink after work.
Now back to work :-)
At this moment, I hope everyone remembers exactly what they did, what
karma and tools they used, to make the release
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I just created an account, user name "pats".
Whitelisted.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On 9/10/2016 7:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/9/2016 12:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Actually, 4.1.2 was exactly this. Your starting point should thus be
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.2 ; just
copy the wiki page and edit/generalize
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/9/2016 12:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Actually, 4.1.2 was exactly this. Your starting point should thus be
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.2 ; just
copy the wiki page and edit/generalize accordingly.
Can you give me a pointer to how t
On 9/9/2016 12:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Planning+Template
It is what I would want to do for a major release with user interface
changes.
Yes, that one is the template for a 4.2.0, not for a 4.1.3 releas
Am 09/09/2016 09:11 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Planning+Template
It is what I would want to do for a major release with user interface
changes.
Yes, that one is the template for a 4.2.0, not for a 4.1.3 re
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Planning+Template
It is what I would want to do for a major release with user interface
changes.
Yes, that one is the template for a 4.2.0, not for a 4.1.3 release.
We also need something far, far more agile
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> We also need something far, far more agile for getting simple bug fix
> releases out quickly and easily. I propose using 4.1.3 as a test case for a
> stripped down process.
>
+1
Phil
~~
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
I've looked at the Release Planning Template,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Planning+Template
It is what I would want to do for a major release with user interface
changes.
We also need something far, far more agile for getting simple bug fix
releases out quick
30 matches
Mail list logo
