And now it should be.
> On Feb 27, 2025, at 6:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> No it’s not.
>
> Best,
> Dave
>
>> On Feb 27, 2025, at 6:22 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Is the SVN repo now read-only?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 26.02.25
Hi Matthias,
No it’s not.
Best,
Dave
> On Feb 27, 2025, at 6:22 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Is the SVN repo now read-only?
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> Am 26.02.25 um 02:26 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Hi -
>>
>> The devtools repo is now in git -
>> https://github.com/a
Hi Dave,
Is the SVN repo now read-only?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 26.02.25 um 02:26 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
The devtools repo is now in git - https://github.com/apache/openoffice-devtools
Created as follows:
curl https://gitbox.apache.org/authors.txt --output authors.txt
git svn clone http
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:24:49AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Woot!
+1
> > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:26 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> > Hi -
> >
> > The devtools repo is now in git -
> > https://github.com/apache/openoffice-devtools
> >
> > Created as follows:
> >
> > curl https://gitbox.a
Woot!
> On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:26 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> The devtools repo is now in git -
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-devtools
>
> Created as follows:
>
> curl https://gitbox.apache.org/authors.txt --output authors.txt
> git svn clone https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
Hi Dave,
Looks good!
Thanks for creating this.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 26.02.25 um 02:26 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
The devtools repo is now in git - https://github.com/apache/openoffice-devtools
Created as follows:
curl https://gitbox.apache.org/authors.txt --output authors.txt
git svn cl
Woot!
> On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:26 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> The devtools repo is now in git -
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-devtools
>
> Created as follows:
>
> curl https://gitbox.apache.org/authors.txt --output authors.txt
> git svn clone https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
Hi -
The devtools repo is now in git - https://github.com/apache/openoffice-devtools
Created as follows:
curl https://gitbox.apache.org/authors.txt --output authors.txt
git svn clone https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools -A
authors.txt
cd devtools
git remote add origin https://gi
Hi Dave,
Am 15.02.25 um 20:52 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
I have not got to it yet. I do see updates occurring including just today.
Yes, I uploaded some new SVG graphics (experimental).
But still, I don't think this belongs in our source code repo. I would
prefer a separate repo for it.
Re
Hi -
I have not got to it yet. I do see updates occurring including just today.
Best,
Dave
> On Feb 15, 2025, at 4:47 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> So I assume this is canceled?
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 14.12.24 um 09:36 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 14.12.24 um 00:42 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec
So I assume this is canceled?
Matthias
Am 14.12.24 um 09:36 schrieb Marcus:
Am 14.12.24 um 00:42 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel
wrote:
Am 13.12.24 um 16:58 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 12:34 A
Am 14.12.24 um 00:42 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 13.12.24 um 16:58 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 12:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On
> On Dec 13, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave, Jim, All,
>
> Am 13.12.24 um 16:58 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>
>>> On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Dec 13, 2024, at 12:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> On Dec 12, 202
Hi Dave, Jim, All,
Am 13.12.24 um 16:58 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 13, 2024, at 12:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 12, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Agreed. Should we
> On Dec 13, 2024, at 2:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2024, at 12:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Dec 12, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Agreed. Should we call the git ver
> On Dec 12, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 12, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. Should we call the git version openoffice-devtools.git? Or do we
>> move these to a devtools directory in openoffice.git?
>>
>> We can then archive the directories
> On Dec 12, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Agreed. Should we call the git version openoffice-devtools.git? Or do we move
> these to a devtools directory in openoffice.git?
>
> We can then archive the directories that are no longer relevant
>
>> On Dec 12, 2024, at 2:26 AM, Jim Jag
Agreed. Should we call the git version openoffice-devtools.git? Or do we move
these to a devtools directory in openoffice.git?
We can then archive the directories that are no longer relevant
> On Dec 12, 2024, at 2:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The `devtools` repo is still hosted under svn..
There is.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020, 12:04 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I am suggesting to break the svn in several repos, yes. But we can do it
> theoretically at any time. I just thought if we switch it is a good
> opportunity to take a look. As I said below we have ideas to split multiple
> things into
I am suggesting to break the svn in several repos, yes. But we can do it
theoretically at any time. I just thought if we switch it is a good opportunity
to take a look. As I said below we have ideas to split multiple things into
smaller parts.
There is no rush.
Am 6. August 2020 13:56:27 MESZ
So are you thinking about breaking devtools into a bunch of sep repos? Or
keeping it as a single repo that contains a collection of devtools?
Why am I proposing this: Currently, to build our community AOO builds you need
BOTH svn and git. It would be nice to need just one.
> On Aug 5, 2020, at
Imho Svn or Git is also not important. ;)
Am 5. August 2020 15:56:34 MESZ schrieb Nathan Rosenburg
:
>Not important.
>
>On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 7:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>> Due to the fact that Git repos unlike svn can only checked out in
>total, I
>> would rather prefer to split all applicati
Not important.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 7:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Due to the fact that Git repos unlike svn can only checked out in total, I
> would rather prefer to split all applications into own repos.
> Just don't forget we have the idea to split a lot of other things. GSI
> Check will move
Due to the fact that Git repos unlike svn can only checked out in total, I
would rather prefer to split all applications into own repos.
Just don't forget we have the idea to split a lot of other things. GSI Check
will move into its own Repo. UNO libraries WE have talked about to separate
into o
Good.send on.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 5:09 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move
> devtools as well over there as well?
> > --
On 8/4/20 7:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 4, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move devtools
as well over there as well?
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move
>> devtools as well over there as well?
>> -
Hi Jim,
On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move devtools
as well over there as well?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For add
28 matches
Mail list logo
