On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
wrote:
>
> On 12/06/2012 12:12 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>
>> So two entirely different questions:
>>
>> 1) Improving the accuracy the statistical (and other numerical
>> methods) we already have.
>>
>> 2) Extending the range of numerical meth
On 12/06/2012 12:12 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
So two entirely different questions:
1) Improving the accuracy the statistical (and other numerical
methods) we already have.
2) Extending the range of numerical methods we provide out-of-the-box
My first thought when I read this was adding extended p
Hi Regina;
>_
> From: Regina Henschel
>
>Hi Pedro,
>
>Pedro Giffuni schrieb:
>> Hi guys;
>>
>> FWIW, while I was playing with the new random number generator I went
>> around looking for some references and I found this paper from the Journal
>> of Statistical Software (2010)
Hi Pedro,
Pedro Giffuni schrieb:
Hi guys;
FWIW, while I was playing with the new random number generator I went
around looking for some references and I found this paper from the Journal
of Statistical Software (2010) titled "On the Numerical Accuracy of
Spreadsheets":
http://www.jstatsoft.org
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> FWIW, while I was playing with the new random number generator I went
> around looking for some references and I found this paper from the Journal
> of Statistical Software (2010) titled "On the Numerical Accuracy of
> Spreadshee
Hi,
I found the following paper several weeks ago in [1] (written in Japanese) that
descrives about the paper that Pedro mentioned.
"On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2010",
Submitted but rejected, January 2012
http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~gmelard/Recherche.htm
And I ha
