+1
> On Jan 8, 2020, at 9:02 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> On 1/8/2020 5:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> Hi -
>> See inline
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> On Jan 8, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> hope I do not annoy anyone, with my questions.
>>> I have looked
At least checking bz and documenting the findings should be done.
And the refactoring I want to do. I already know how the code should look like.
Am 9. Januar 2020 10:57:46 MEZ schrieb Patricia Shanahan :
>What happens if you ignore the assertion and carry on?
>
>I had to do that for several as
What happens if you ignore the assertion and carry on?
I had to do that for several assertions when debugging some security
problems - the problems I was working were higher priority.
On 1/9/2020 1:35 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
To be clear the Assert is a different issue and needs more rese
Hi,
To be clear the Assert is a different issue and needs more research.
The Assert claims a different object is to be used for top level objects. Since
the issue pops up on top-level object, right at start, I assume something is
not as it should be designed. The answers on the list suggest tha
On 1/8/2020 5:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi -
See inline
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 8, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hello again,
hope I do not annoy anyone, with my questions.
I have looked deeper in the issue using OpenGrok.
Now the Issue seems pretty clear.
We have only the fun
Hi -
See inline
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 8, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> hope I do not annoy anyone, with my questions.
> I have looked deeper in the issue using OpenGrok.
>
> Now the Issue seems pretty clear.
> We have only the function signatures:
>
> fi
Hello again,
hope I do not annoy anyone, with my questions.
I have looked deeper in the issue using OpenGrok.
Now the Issue seems pretty clear.
We have only the function signatures:
file: atkwrapper.hxx
85 AtkObject *atk_object_wrapper_new(
86 const ::com::sun::star::uno::Refer
