On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> For the legacy Mercurial repository Andrea mentioned to be useful to
>> future
>> developers I would expect the copyright status of the repo to thus need
>> clarifying, and I don't recall seeing a definitive stateme
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>>
>> For the legacy Mercurial repository Andrea mentioned to be useful to
>> future
>> developers I would expect the copyright status of the repo to thus need
>> clarifying, and I don't recall seeing a definitive statem
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Simon Phipps
>> wrote:
>> >> > Wa
Simon Phipps wrote:
For the legacy Mercurial repository Andrea mentioned to be useful to future
developers I would expect the copyright status of the repo to thus need
clarifying, and I don't recall seeing a definitive statement.
Actually what I wrote at the beginning of this thread, months ago
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Simon Phipps
> wrote:
> >> > Was the licensing status of the CWSes in this repository every
>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>> > Was the licensing status of the CWSes in this repository every resolved?
>> >
>>
>> The authorship is varied.
>
>
> Independent
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > Was the licensing status of the CWSes in this repository every resolved?
> >
>
> The authorship is varied.
Independent of the developers involved and the individual rights they might
hav
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> Was the licensing status of the CWSes in this repository every resolved?
>
The authorship is varied. What CWS did you have in mind specifically?
-Rob
> S.
-
To unsubscrib
Was the licensing status of the CWSes in this repository every resolved?
S.
On 22/08/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I've now made a local copy of it, but archiving it somewhere where all
committers can access it would probably be the safest solution. At over 2
GBytes, it's quite big for people.apache.org (even ignoring licen
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Mercurial repository at http://hg.services.openoffice.org/ is no
>>> longer
>>> current but it is still useful since it contains important histori
On Jul 1, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 6/27/2013 9:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> The Mercurial repository at http://hg.services.openoffice.org/ is no longer
>> current but it is still useful since it contains important historical
>> information.
>>
>> It is still hosted by O
On 6/27/2013 9:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The Mercurial repository at http://hg.services.openoffice.org/ is no
longer current but it is still useful since it contains important
historical information.
It is still hosted by Oracle and it is now down.
Any plans to restore it?
It will not be
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Mercurial repository at http://hg.services.openoffice.org/ is no
>>> longer
>>> current but it is still useful since it contains important histori
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The Mercurial repository at http://hg.services.openoffice.org/ is no longer
current but it is still useful since it contains important historical
information. ...
Is it the same as: https://bitbucket.org/mst/ooo340 ???
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> The Mercurial repository at http://hg.services.openoffice.org/ is no longer
> current but it is still useful since it contains important historical
> information.
>
> It is still hosted by Oracle and it is now down.
>
> Any plans to restor
16 matches
Mail list logo
