.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:08 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice. (There
Thanks and yes, no help!
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Am 07/18/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond
. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:08 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice. (There
was an out-of-cycle security fix, but
.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:08 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice. (There
was
ssage-
From: Steele, Raymond [mailto:raymond.ste...@lmco.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:29 PM
To: Andrea Pescetti; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton; 'Don'
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Who completed the OpenOffice 3.3 Solaris x86 build? It seem
Who completed the OpenOffice 3.3 Solaris x86 build? It seems that we could
easily add the new vendor to the few files listed here, then recompile. I am
sure someone already has the environment set up considering the code was
compiled for Solaris x86 in the past. This could then become a version
Hi Raymond,
On 08.07.2013 21:31, Steele, Raymond wrote:
Thanks for the response. I've been informed by Nicolas Christoper of Adfinis
Sygroup that the Solaris x86 port was not completed, but could be completed at
cost. I am not sure where my organization will go from here. We've been using
the
st to port OpenOffice to Solaris x86 ourselves, but we
are considering our options. Advice?
Raymond
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 12:21 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.
On 06.07.2013 17:12, Steele, Raymond wrote:
Thank you for the reply. What shall I do about 3.3 not being supported? There
is not a OpenOffice 3.4 available for Solaris 10 x86 under the ASF.
As you know our friends at Adfinis Sygroup provided a Solaris-X86 build
of AOO 3.4.0
https://adfini
On 06/07/2013 Steele, Raymond wrote:
What shall I do about 3.3 not being
supported? There is not a OpenOffice 3.4 available for Solaris 10
x86 under the ASF.
Third parties may be able to offer extended support, or to put the
necessary work in place (contributing code upstream, following the m
Andrea,
Thank you for the reply. What shall I do about 3.3 not being supported? There
is not a OpenOffice 3.4 available for Solaris 10 x86 under the ASF.
From: Andrea Pescetti [pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 12:40 AM
To: dev@openoffi
3.3 does not acknowledge the Java 7
JRE?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:40 PM
To: 'dennis.hamil...@acm.org'; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: 'Don'
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Thanks for the r
Thanks for the response, Dennis.
1. We are using 32-bit JVM
2. Do you know how to verify this? Or change its behavior if this is the case?
3. There is nothing like the windows registry on Solaris that could be getting
in the way of this.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mail
13 matches
Mail list logo
