On 03/05/2013 Herbert Dürr wrote:
On 2013/05/02 9:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
In general, we should
consolidate build dependencies (libraries, dictionaries) on as few
servers as possible, to avoid problems like this one.
+1
We already have [3] as backup to upstream locations for the category-
2013/5/2 Andrea Pescetti :
> I've just updated the Building Guide accordingly:
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO#Configuration_and_bootstrapping
Here also [1].
1 -
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step
--
Albino B Neto
De
On 2013/05/02 9:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Andrew Rist wrote:
On 5/2/2013 12:22 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
There is also the version that we use at the moment:
http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz
changes made and linux 64 build kicked off...
I've just updated the Buil
Andrew Rist wrote:
On 5/2/2013 12:22 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
There is also the version that we use at the moment:
http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz
changes made and linux 64 build kicked off...
I've just updated the Building Guide accordingly:
http://wiki.openoffice.
On 5/2/2013 12:22 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 02.05.2013 00:57, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:03:10 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 29.04.2013 10:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:22:16 +0200
Oli
2013/5/2 Andre Fischer :
> There is also the version that we use at the moment:
> http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz
> it even has the right MD5 checksum so we don't have to change
> main/epm/makefile.mk
I also have this, I not has problems more.
--
Albino B Neto
Debian G
2013/5/2 Andre Fischer :
>> http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-4.2-source.tar.bz2
>>
>> But, since we have epm in extras already -- well 3.7. For some reason I
>> thought the builds got the packs from extras if the link failed, or is
>> this
+1
--
Albino B Neto
Debian GNU/Linux | FSFLA | F
On 02.05.2013 00:57, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:03:10 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 29.04.2013 10:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:22:16 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I have jus
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:03:10 +0200
> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 29.04.2013 10:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:22:16 +0200
> > > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:03:10 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29.04.2013 10:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:22:16 +0200
> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have just noticed that the epm source package - build requirement for
> >> Linu
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:03:10 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29.04.2013 10:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:22:16 +0200
> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have just noticed that the epm source package - build requirement for
> >> Linu
Hi,
On 29.04.2013 10:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:22:16 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I have just noticed that the epm source package - build requirement for
Linux platform - is no longer available via [1] as easysw.com has closed
its doors. This is also the rea
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:22:16 +0200
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just noticed that the epm source package - build requirement for
> Linux platform - is no longer available via [1] as easysw.com has closed
> its doors. This is also the reason why our working Linux buildbots cou
13 matches
Mail list logo
