Hi,
Just FYI, Yuri confirmed that the fix works on OS/2:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128427#c6
Thanks again, Jim!
Regards,
Matthias
Am 27.08.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim, Arrigo,
>
> Am 27.08.21 um 11:24 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> Hello Jim, All,
>>
>> On T
Hi Jim, Arrigo,
Am 27.08.21 um 11:24 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello Jim, All,
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 06:08:48PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:34:02PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Arrigo wrote that "it still does not
Hello Jim, All,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 06:08:48PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:34:02PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Arrigo wrote that "it still does not work, unfortunately"
>
> Yes! Did I miss anything?
I did miss it! I m
Hello All,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:34:02PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Arrigo wrote that "it still does not work, unfortunately"
Yes! Did I miss anything?
> Did you build Dev3 with a newer clang?
>
> @Yuri: Can you try to build for OS/2 with the latest AOO41X?
+1
> Am 26.
Hi Jim,
Arrigo wrote that "it still does not work, unfortunately"
Did you build Dev3 with a newer clang?
@Yuri: Can you try to build for OS/2 with the latest AOO41X?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 26.08.21 um 16:27 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I believe the fix, which is universal, is already folded int
I believe the fix, which is universal, is already folded into the repos
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 5:43 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Am 06.08.21 um 12:26 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> Hello Jim, All,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:41:23PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> Ne
Hi all,
Am 06.08.21 um 12:26 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello Jim, All,
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:41:23PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Never mind that one: This one is the one: THX!
> it still does not work, unfortunately. Quoting the rest for
> completeness.
Any ideas?
A fix would b
Hello Jim, All,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:41:23PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Never mind that one: This one is the one: THX!
it still does not work, unfortunately. Quoting the rest for
completeness.
> diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
> b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelpe
Hello Jim,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:41:23PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Never mind that one: This one is the one: THX!
[...]
Compiling now.
Best regards,
--
Arrigo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apac
Never mind that one: This one is the one: THX!
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,9 +131,
Can you try this:
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,9 +131,10 @@ inline sal_Bool SAL_CAL
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..8ea41ec95f 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,16 +131,22 @@ inline sal_Bool SAL_CALL extractInterface
> On Aug 4, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:09:11AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Jim,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:39:14AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
Hello Jim,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:09:11AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello Jim,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:39:14AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >> Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and s
> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:39:14AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works?
>>
>> diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
>> b/main/co
Hello Jim,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:39:14AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works?
>
> diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
> b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
> index dc67c5dc58..97c4d080f4 10064
Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works?
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..97c4d080f4 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelpe
Hello Jim, All,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:42:47PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it seems so very, very
> platform and SDK sensitive.
>
> Someone remind me what the catalina branch is and how it relates to trunk and
> AOO42X, please :-)
T
It does...
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:25 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 19:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I
>> missing something?
>
> Yes, we had this problem with AOO41X. I don't know if it also
Hi Jim,
Am 03.08.21 um 19:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I
> missing something?
Yes, we had this problem with AOO41X. I don't know if it also occurs in
AOO42X.
>
>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>>
Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I
missing something?
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it seems so very,
>> very
Hi Jim,
Am 03.08.21 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it seems so very, very
> platform and SDK sensitive.
>
> Someone remind me what the catalina branch is and how it relates to trunk and
> AOO42X, please :-)
https://github.com/apache/openo
Hmmm... this seems to indicate that it is something in the UNO code itself
which may be the issue, and specifically about exception handling... possibly
some weirdness in the assembly part.
That narrows things down... great work Arrigo!
---
Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it seems so very, very
platform and SDK sensitive.
Someone remind me what the catalina branch is and how it relates to trunk and
AOO42X, please :-)
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> resurrecting a
Hi Arrigo,
> Maybe someone else can test on OS/2?
I can build relevant code with debug info once I get back from holidays.
I hope to give a try in about 10 days.
Thanks for finding this!
Yuri
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
Hello Damjan,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:03:37PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:21 PM Arrigo Marchiori
> wrote:
>
> > But that property _was_ set as a bool by method
> > XMLFilter::impl_Export(), in file
> > main/chart2/source/model/filter/XMLFilter.cxx, at the begi
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:21 PM Arrigo Marchiori
wrote:
> But that property _was_ set as a bool by method
> XMLFilter::impl_Export(), in file
> main/chart2/source/model/filter/XMLFilter.cxx, at the beginning of
> this explanation:
>
> 691: xInfoSet->setPropertyValue( sUsePrettyPrinting, uno::ma
Hello Carl,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:14:55PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> On 7/27/21 4:21 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > resurrecting an old thread.
> >
> > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 02:19:44PM -, Yuri Dario wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > i can build
Hi Arrigo,
On 7/27/21 4:21 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello All,
resurrecting an old thread.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 02:19:44PM -, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi,
i can build AOO 4.2.x without problems with gcc 6.3 which is in Debian 9
I had problems to build it at Debian 10 with gcc 8.3.
here
Hello All,
resurrecting an old thread.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 02:19:44PM -, Yuri Dario wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > i can build AOO 4.2.x without problems with gcc 6.3 which is in Debian 9
> > I had problems to build it at Debian 10 with gcc 8.3.
>
> here I have a 4.2 build done under Manjaro with
30 matches
Mail list logo
