Am 12/21/2014 11:20 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Thanks for the comments so far on this thread.
I want to make one wording change, to using
"Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).
A suitable JRE is not installed. For details
http://openoffice.org/java.html";
The
Thanks for the comments so far on this thread.
I want to make one wording change, to using
"Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).
A suitable JRE is not installed. For details
http://openoffice.org/java.html";
The statement "unavailable" is too broad. All that is kno
On 12/18/2014 03:47 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
> -- replying to --
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 14:36
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] "No Suitable JRE" Message
>
> Am
-- replying to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 14:36
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] "No Suitable JRE" Message
Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
> "Some OpenOffice operations use
Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
"Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).
A suitable JRE is unavailable. For details
http://openoffice.org/java.html";
I am proposing this to avoid the various cases that arise, not just the 32-bit
on x64 Windows cas
On 12/17/2014 09:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
"Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).
A suitable JRE is unavailable. For details
http://openoffice.org/java.html";
I am proposing this to avoid the various cases that arise, not just the 32-bit
on x64 Windows case.
On 12/17/2014 06:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> "Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE). A suitable JRE is
> unavailable. For details http://openoffice.org/java.html";
+1
>
> I am proposing this to avoid the various cases that arise, not just
> the 32-bit on x64 Windows case. I
