Re: Please update boost (1.79.0 would be just great)

2023-01-21 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
For Clang, c++14 is the default, see https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html where it says "By default, Clang builds C++ code according to the C++14 standard". On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:45 AM Yury Tarasievich wrote: > Apologies if I'm being dense here, but is this > indeed compiling to c++14? Won

Re: Please update boost (1.79.0 would be just great)

2023-01-20 Thread Yury Tarasievich
Apologies if I'm being dense here, but is this indeed compiling to c++14? Won't you need explicit -std=c++14 option for that? To compile 'just' to c++11 (on linux) a patch of about 19 parts is needed, although admittedly it consists mostly of these guys: +#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFER

Re: Please update boost (1.79.0 would be just great)

2023-01-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 1:58 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 8:25 PM Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Helo guys; >> I don't currently have all the time I'd wish for AOO development so I >> thought I'd suggest this task for some volunteer. >> The Apache OpenOffice FreeBSD port h

Re: Please update boost (1.79.0 would be just great)

2023-01-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 8:25 PM Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Helo guys; > I don't currently have all the time I'd wish for AOO development so I > thought I'd suggest this task for some volunteer. > The Apache OpenOffice FreeBSD port has been broken for awhile and getting > boost updated would be of gre