On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:55:45 -0500
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> My 4.2.0 development builds for Linux64, built on CentOS6, are
> being uploaded to:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1823225/
>
> for testing to see if that resolves the below bug.
Using A00 4.2.0 64bit deb
Sorry. All fixed.
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 07.02.2018 um 21:55 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> My 4.2.0 development builds for Linux64, built on CentOS6, are
>> being uploaded to:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1823225/
>>
>> fo
Am 07.02.2018 um 21:55 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> My 4.2.0 development builds for Linux64, built on CentOS6, are
> being uploaded to:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1823225/
>
> for testing to see if that resolves the below bug.
Great, but:
You don't have permission
My 4.2.0 development builds for Linux64, built on CentOS6, are
being uploaded to:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-4.2.0-dev-r1823225/
for testing to see if that resolves the below bug.
PS: Re the --macosx-target. If it's been unused, I'm not comfy starting
to use it ;)
> On
Just a FYI that this required libxslt-devel to be installed...
Building as we speak... (CentOS6, 64bit)
> On Jan 30, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Will do. I'll fire it up later on today or early tomorrow
>
>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ji
Will do. I'll fire it up later on today or early tomorrow
> On Jan 29, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Maybe you could try to do a build on CentOS with --with-system-libxml
> and --with-system-libxslt to see if this problem can be resolved:
> https://bz.apache.org/o
Hi Jim,
Maybe you could try to do a build on CentOS with --with-system-libxml
and --with-system-libxslt to see if this problem can be resolved:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127315
My "unofficial" 4.2.0-Beta for Windows (incl. Language Pack and SDK) can
be found here:
https://home.apa
Sorry I wanted, but I am stuck in other topics :(
I am glad if someone else gets in the "test bus" and starts driving.
On 23.01.2018 16:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
So what is the plan for a 4.2.0-beta release?
Is someone "driving" that effort?
---
So what is the plan for a 4.2.0-beta release?
Is someone "driving" that effort?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
+1
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 6:13 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> ...
> What do you think?
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hi Kay, Hi Open Office community,
my name is Driss from Munich. I started before 3 years as developer
volounteer in Open Office community and successfully solved some bugs. But
because of some reasons I was not able to continue.
Now I have about 3hours or even more per Week to help with testing.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Peter kovacs wrote:
> No you have not.
> Look at the numbers. We have a team of 2 + myself to build test cases and
> a test concept.
>
> Without automatisation of user based test this will be very slow.
>
> So yes please, go through the technical test we have and
Hi Peter,
I can spend About 3hours per week for open office testing. What is the best
way to get quickly involved and run tests?
Regards
Driss
Peter Kovacs schrieb am Do. 11. Jan. 2018 um 17:33:
> You can download 4.2.0 and start on your own. Or and you can state that
> you would like to help
You can download 4.2.0 and start on your own. Or and you can state that you
would like to help in a coordinated effort. Then we talk about it soon on QA.
You are most welcome whatever your choice is.
Sorry I am just slow...
Am 11. Januar 2018 03:05:29 MEZ schrieb Morris Moore :
>How to get invol
No you have not.
Look at the numbers. We have a team of 2 + myself to build test cases and a
test concept.
Without automatisation of user based test this will be very slow.
So yes please, go through the technical test we have and if you could setup a
list in one wiki this is wonderful. I would
How to get involved in testing as volunteer
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>> I know we have a number of Google tests incorporated currently. I don't
>>> know much
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> I know we have a number of Google tests incorporated currently. I don't
>> know much about how to construct these, but I'd like to help as well.
>>
>
> Sure, this would be very nice to have!
>
> But the discussion he
I would like to get started developing so this would be a good place to start
I have setup the build env and have built get latest on Linux
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 3:22 AM, Anita Jeziorska wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not experienced well, but can try to help.
>
>
>
> 2018-01-09
Kay Schenk wrote:
I know we have a number of Google tests incorporated currently. I don't
know much about how to construct these, but I'd like to help as well.
Sure, this would be very nice to have!
But the discussion here (especially on the QA list) is mostly focused on
manual testing by hu
Hi all --
I know we have a number of Google tests incorporated currently. I don't
know much about how to construct these, but I'd like to help as well.
Currently the output of the tests is included in the normal build output if
I'm not mistaken. I think it would be valuable to provide a separate
Hi,
I'm not experienced well, but can try to help.
2018-01-09 1:44 GMT+01:00 DurgaPrasad Potnuru :
> +1
>
> (willing to work in coordinated test approach, let me know how can I
> contribute.. am not familiar with test plans for earlier version, so might
> require some (minimal) guidance)
>
> O
+1
(willing to work in coordinated test approach, let me know how can I
contribute.. am not familiar with test plans for earlier version, so might
require some (minimal) guidance)
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 4.2.0 in the pipe we need to substential tes
Hi all,
With 4.2.0 in the pipe we need to substential tests.
Since we have figured in 4.1.4 that we need a more substential testing,
I wonder if we have volunteers that are willed to work in a more
coordinated test approach.
My Idea would be to organize a testplan, which tries to cover a good
23 matches
Mail list logo
