-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2016 20:54, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> Thanks for your patience, what follows it's the result of a joint meet
ing
> with our AdOps team and our Managing Director.
Is "our AdOps team" a SourceForge team, or an Apache Software Foundation
Tea
Thanks for your patience, what follows it's the result of a joint meeting
with our AdOps team and our Managing Director.
Ad Ops has paused the Google Ad Exchange ad serving on SourceForge.net's
Apache Open Office project pages. This will continue while the team
completes our review of the Ad Exch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2016 08:02, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Something has been puzzling me lately. What if this is deliberate?. I
> mean, people setting up these "fake AOO" sites and then joining the SF
.net
> advertisers network only to hurt AOO?.
Pretty much sin
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Patience! Let's see what Roberto has to say
Something has been puzzling me lately. What if this is delliberate?. I
mean, people setting up these "fake AOO" sites and then joining the SF.net
advertisers network only to hurt AOO?.
Can an indiv
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad
> that has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content?
It's not as simple as that, some evildoers create ad buttons that show the
word "download" or a "play" butt
The choice to go with sourceforge was not about stats. OpenOffice binaries are
quite substantial. There was concern about if all the Apache mirrors could
handle the load.
Patience! Let's see what Roberto has to say. SourceForge has been generous.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 7,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Apache’s mirrors already have the binaries, and should handle the load.
It has been argued repeatedly that they wouldn't.
FC
Apache’s mirrors already have the binaries, and should handle the load. Are we
afraid of losing DL stats, is that why we stick with SF?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 8. jan. 2016 kl. 04.46 skrev Dave Fisher :
>
> Hi Roberto,
>
> Is it possible for
Hi Roberto,
Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad that
has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content?
I understand there are technical challenges. If that is difficult is it
possible to simply block all ads?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan
+1 for a divorce :)
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Roberto Galoppini <
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for heads up, both the account and its creatives have been blocked.
>
> Roberto
>
> 2016-01-07 15:38 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
>
> >
> > Today, we have 2 users that have pay for a f
Thanks for heads up, both the account and its creatives have been blocked.
Roberto
2016-01-07 15:38 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
>
> Today, we have 2 users that have pay for a fake OpenOffice2015
>
>
> https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=l&ai=Cqhy-1neOVt6KL-WpiQackZzAAYfp7MoH34WD-LgC1MrWdxAB
Hello forum,
There are regularly messages complaining of costly or spammed OpenOffice on the
french forum.
Because end-users don't have ad blocker, Sf.net shows links to para-sites.
The download of the genuine OpenOffice appears delayed, so the user click on
this "fake" OpenOffice.
As for other
12 matches
Mail list logo
