On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 28 May 2013 18:12, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>> It never occurred to me that those were flying books. Taking another look,
>> it still doesn't work. If made more obviously as books, I'm not sure how
>> that will occur as indicative o
On 28 May 2013 18:12, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> It never occurred to me that those were flying books. Taking another look,
> it still doesn't work. If made more obviously as books, I'm not sure how
> that will occur as indicative of an office productivity suite. (I have no
> idea how bird
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> What we've done so far:
>
> 1) Called for logo submissions from the community
>
> 2) Many designers responded and we received 40 submissions. There was
> a lot of "cross-fertilization" of ideas, as designers saw what others
> had come up with, wh
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On May 31, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On May 30, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Hagar Delest <
> hagar.del...@laposte
On May 31, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On May 30, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Hagar Delest >> wrote:
>>>
Le 30/05/2013 22:53, Rob Weir a écrit :
I think the importa
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On May 30, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Hagar Delest >wrote:
> >
> >> Le 30/05/2013 22:53, Rob Weir a écrit :
> >>
> >> I think the important thing is to realize that long-standing
> >>> OpenOff
On May 30, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
>
>> Le 30/05/2013 22:53, Rob Weir a écrit :
>>
>> I think the important thing is to realize that long-standing
>>> OpenOffice users, like you and me, have strong opinions and
>>> perceptions
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Le 30/05/2013 22:53, Rob Weir a écrit :
>
> I think the important thing is to realize that long-standing
>> OpenOffice users, like you and me, have strong opinions and
>> perceptions on this that are not necessarily reflective of the views
>>
Le 30/05/2013 22:53, Rob Weir a écrit :
I think the important thing is to realize that long-standing
OpenOffice users, like you and me, have strong opinions and
perceptions on this that are not necessarily reflective of the views
of the broader user base. We're too close and too familiar with th
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Le 28/05/2013 00:55, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
>
>> PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current
>> logo.
>
>
> Well, rather disappointing I would say. So much energy lost for just so few
> changes...
I don't th
Le 28/05/2013 00:55, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current logo.
Well, rather disappointing I would say. So much energy lost for just so few
changes...
Perhaps it tells that there was no need to change the logo at all.
Le 28/0
2013/5/27 Rob Weir :
> That's where we are now. The updated logos (three of them) are on the wiki
> now:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Stage+2+Logo+Refinement
>
> As you can see there is quite a bit of convergence on a design occurring.
>
> So what next?
>
> I'd like to
logo designs. If so then I think a treatment
> >> like "Version 4.0" in grey and blue might work.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - Dennis
> >>>
> >>> PS: Interesting that we've come
On 28/05/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
That's where we are now. The updated logos (three of them) are on the wiki now:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Stage+2+Logo+Refinement
As you can see there is quite a bit of convergence on a design occurring.
This is just right for a product
ovement on the
> orb in the current logo, which has the appearance of a button or globe
> standing on a surface.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Grignon [mailto:kevingrignon...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 05:44 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> The only way I can visualize the book notion is that I am seeing an
> unfolded piece of paper. If this is two facing pages of an open book, the
> problem is there is nothing to suggest the rest of the book.
>
It could be bookish with
y and blue might work.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Dennis
>>>
>>> PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current
>> logo.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>
.apache.org
Cc: marketing; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
Hello all,
I wanted to share some design rationale for the gull/book pages enhancement in
my logo.
In my design I wanted to make the "gulls" into flying books. I made them
broader a
Vital Portal Webinars at:
The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center .
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Grignon"
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: "marketing" , dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:46:29 AM
Subject: Re: Next steps for AOO 4.
t;> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Dennis
>>>
>>> PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current
>> logo.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:ro
I think a treatment
>> like "Version 4.0" in grey and blue might work.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Dennis
>>>
>>> PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current
>> logo.
s
>>>
>>> PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current
>> logo.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:22 PM
>>> To: de
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:22 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; market...@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
> >
> > What we
Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:22 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; market...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
>
> What we've done so far:
>
>
g that we've come around to a close variant of the current logo.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:22 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; market...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
Wha
What we've done so far:
1) Called for logo submissions from the community
2) Many designers responded and we received 40 submissions. There was
a lot of "cross-fertilization" of ideas, as designers saw what others
had come up with, what worked, and borrowed ideas.
3) We did a survey of user res
26 matches
Mail list logo
