Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-12-04 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/2/12 7:12 PM, janI wrote: > thanks rob for clarifying it. > > It just shows how wrong my thought were, but I have been searching to find > documentation on the split, reasons why, person conflicts etc...that seems > buried quite deep (maybe for good reasons), and the IBM approach to LO also

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-12-02 Thread janI
thanks rob for clarifying it. It just shows how wrong my thought were, but I have been searching to find documentation on the split, reasons why, person conflicts etc...that seems buried quite deep (maybe for good reasons), and the IBM approach to LO also seems quite hard to find, so please unders

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-12-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:02 PM, janI wrote: > On 1 December 2012 18:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 28/11/2012 janI wrote: >> >>> I have had a look, and the tool does with a few exceptions, what genLang >>> was supposed to do. There are no reason to make parallel developments so >>> the l10n d

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-12-01 Thread janI
On 1 December 2012 18:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 28/11/2012 janI wrote: > >> I have had a look, and the tool does with a few exceptions, what genLang >> was supposed to do. There are no reason to make parallel developments so >> the l10n development has been stopped. >> > > Reading the descr

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-12-01 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 28/11/2012 janI wrote: I have had a look, and the tool does with a few exceptions, what genLang was supposed to do. There are no reason to make parallel developments so the l10n development has been stopped. Reading the description it seems it can be used as a basis to improve the Apache Op

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread janI
On 28 November 2012 15:22, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:09 AM, janI wrote: > > On 28 November 2012 14:28, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:07 AM, janI wrote: > >> > Thanks to an e-mail from Andrew, I have become aware that LO has > >> finalized > >> > a new too

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:09 AM, janI wrote: > On 28 November 2012 14:28, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:07 AM, janI wrote: >> > Thanks to an e-mail from Andrew, I have become aware that LO has >> finalized >> > a new tool set: >> > >> > http://libreoffice.hu/2012/11/27/featureki

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread janI
On 28 November 2012 14:28, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:07 AM, janI wrote: > > Thanks to an e-mail from Andrew, I have become aware that LO has > finalized > > a new tool set: > > > > http://libreoffice.hu/2012/11/27/featurekillsdf-branch-merged/ > > > > I have had a look, and the

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread Xuacu
I'm pretty sure that we, translators, would buy the beer. A lot of beer... XD 2012/11/28 Pavel Janík > > On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:07 AM, janI wrote: > > > It is soon Christmas so it allowed to wishmy wish this year will be > > that some of our funding is spent on, getting key people for L

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:07 AM, janI wrote: > Thanks to an e-mail from Andrew, I have become aware that LO has finalized > a new tool set: > > http://libreoffice.hu/2012/11/27/featurekillsdf-branch-merged/ > > I have had a look, and the tool does with a few exceptions, what genLang > was supposed

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread janI
On 28 November 2012 13:16, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:07:35AM +0100, janI wrote: > > Thanks to an e-mail from Andrew, I have become aware that LO has > finalized > > a new tool set: > > > > http://libreoffice.hu/2012/11/27/featurekillsdf-branch-merged/ > > > > I hav

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:07:35AM +0100, janI wrote: > Thanks to an e-mail from Andrew, I have become aware that LO has finalized > a new tool set: > > http://libreoffice.hu/2012/11/27/featurekillsdf-branch-merged/ > > I have had a look, and the tool does with a few exceptions, what genLang > wa

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread Pavel Janík
On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Pavel Janík wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:07 AM, janI wrote: > >> It is soon Christmas so it allowed to wishmy wish this year will be >> that some of our funding is spent on, getting key people for LO and AOO >> together. Lock them up in a room with a big p

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread Pavel Janík
On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:07 AM, janI wrote: > It is soon Christmas so it allowed to wishmy wish this year will be > that some of our funding is spent on, getting key people for LO and AOO > together. Lock them up in a room with a big pizza, tell them the door will > be unlocked when they have a

L10n tools is no longer needed.

2012-11-28 Thread janI
Thanks to an e-mail from Andrew, I have become aware that LO has finalized a new tool set: http://libreoffice.hu/2012/11/27/featurekillsdf-branch-merged/ I have had a look, and the tool does with a few exceptions, what genLang was supposed to do. There are no reason to make parallel developments