n/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
> That is the data that we update.
>> This is really beyond my understanding...
> The Project Information page itself is updated (based on our submitted
> data) by a cron job. Apparently that failed this time.
Now it is updated!
We can close this tas
yond my understanding...
The Project Information page itself is updated (based on our submitted
data) by a cron job. Apparently that failed this time.
No magic involved! ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Best,
> Pedro
>
>> On 03/04/2023 3:25 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
dro Lino:
> >> Hi Matthias
> >>
> >>> On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel
> >>> wrote:
> >>> Our updated Project Information is still not published:
> >>>
> >>> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffi
gt; On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>> Our updated Project Information is still not published:
>>>
>>> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
>>>
>>> Normally this is done by a cron job. Am I missing somethi
Hi Pedro,
Am 04.03.23 um 13:22 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>> Our updated Project Information is still not published:
>>
>> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
>>
>> N
Hi Matthias
> On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Our updated Project Information is still not published:
>
> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
>
> Normally this is done by a cron job. Am I missing something?
Maybe the expectation "r
Hi all,
Our updated Project Information is still not published:
https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
Normally this is done by a cron job. Am I missing something?
Regards,
Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ardovm merged PR #160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/160
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apa
ardovm commented on PR #160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/160#issuecomment-1312416674
I will merge this PR in one week if no one objects
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
ardovm opened a new pull request, #160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/160
The SuSE RPMs depend on certain files that were once present in SuSE
distributions, and were deprecated.
Freedesktop RPMs should work flawlessly on today's SUSE and openSUSE
distributions.
est
Peter
Am 03.10.21 um 15:12 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher:
Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here.
Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based
extension (an oxt ), but no information
is supplied.
Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a
.
Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no
information
is supplied.
Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension?
Maybe with a Java
stacktrace?
---rony
P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt, but this was really quite
based
extension (an oxt ), but no information
is supplied.
Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based
extension? Maybe with a Java
stacktrace?
---rony
P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt, but this was really quite
time consuming (and therefore
effortful). Some new
Hi Carl,
On 6/4/2022 3:31 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
... cut ...
Am 03.10.21 um 15:12 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher:
Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here.
Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no
information
is supplied
installed?
All the best
Peter
Am 03.10.21 um 15:12 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher:
Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here.
Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt
), but no information
is supplied.
Question: how to get debug (logging
here.
Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based
extension (an oxt ), but no information
is supplied.
Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based
extension? Maybe with a Java
stacktrace?
---rony
P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt, but this was
registering a Java based extension (an oxt
), but no information
is supplied.
Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension?
Maybe with a Java
stacktrace?
---rony
P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt, but this was really quite time consuming
(and therefore
effortful
Hi Marcus,
Am 16.01.22 um 16:18 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 15.01.22 um 15:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Since there were no public information from me until this "project" was
>> successfully launched on the last minute in parallel with Windows 11, I
>> want to give som
Am 15.01.22 um 15:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Since there were no public information from me until this "project" was
successfully launched on the last minute in parallel with Windows 11, I
want to give some details (now that I have time):
Microsoft introduced the possibility
Hi all,
Since there were no public information from me until this "project" was
successfully launched on the last minute in parallel with Windows 11, I
want to give some details (now that I have time):
Microsoft introduced the possibility to publish "classic" Windows
programs
Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here.
Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt
), but no information
is supplied.
Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension?
Maybe with a Java
stacktrace?
---rony
Hello,
back in the days of OpenOffice.org, there was a well-maintained pool of
information about the market penetration of OpenOffice.org (links to market
research, third-party analysis, etc.).
I would like to ask if anyone, beyond the bare download numbers, knows of
similar information on
t I recognized a slightly bigger vertical space
>>>>>> between the topics on the main page and also the boxes on the download
>>>>>> page. This may be a css issue. Nothing really big.
>>>>> right, but have a look also for the fonts and font size
gt; page. This may be a css issue. Nothing really big.
>>>> right, but have a look also for the fonts and font sizes. Also here
>>>> are visible changes.
>>> Just to be clear: by "project site" I mean
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project
look also for the fonts and font sizes. Also here
>>> are visible changes.
>>
>> Just to be clear: by "project site" I mean
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project not
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org which I haven't built yet.
> Y
Hi -
> On Nov 15, 2020, at 9:31 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 15, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Matthias Seidel wrote:
By the way: these were my first edits to the
https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project not
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org which I haven't built yet.
Yes, you are right. The project information is located on the project
site. Sorry for the confusion. ;-)
IMO the project site is ready for switching.
>
> And I don'
> On Nov 15, 2020, at 9:25 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Marcus ha scritto:
>> Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Matthias Seidel wrote:
By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after
the mi
> On Nov 15, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>> By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after
>>> the migration and everything was smooth, t
Marcus ha scritto:
Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Matthias Seidel wrote:
By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after
the migration and everything was smooth, thanks a lot Dave! It really
looks good for product
Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Matthias Seidel wrote:
By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after
the migration and everything was smooth, thanks a lot Dave! It really
looks good for production.
Technically y
site and published it.
However the cron job needs some time to pick up the new information:
https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
>
> By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after
> the migration and everything was smooth, thanks a lot Dave! It real
Matthias Seidel wrote:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/blob/main/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
I'll regenerate it from the standard template, just in case something
changed there too.
Please update it in the new repository.
Pushed. The template had indeed been updated (references t
cture (which is still writable, right?)
> to the new one, so I will push to the new repositories only.
Thanks for that!
Please update it in the new repository.
But I'd like to have that information updated asap, so I will probably
copy it to online
Dave Fisher wrote:
The file in question is here:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/blob/main/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
You can leave further updates to this file to me for this weekend. I'll
regenerate it from the standard template, just in case something changed
there too.
I m
pic up again.
>
> Our Project Information still lists SVN as Code Repository. We moved to
> Git long ago.
> People who look into SVN will get the impression that there is
> absolutely no development going on...
>
> Is it possible to update the data now?
>
> Regards,
>
>
Hi all,
After the release of AOO 4.1.8 it is time to bump this topic up again.
Our Project Information still lists SVN as Code Repository. We moved to
Git long ago.
People who look into SVN will get the impression that there is
absolutely no development going on...
Is it possible to update the
Don’t trust it. We know nothing about it. No one we know requested it.
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:23 PM, Martin Groenescheij
> wrote:
>
> Strange to receive this important information from someone who isn't
> subscribed to the list.
> Sounds like a Phishing email
>
Hi Andrea,
Am 13.04.20 um 17:26 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
>>
>> I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from
>> Subversion to Git.
>>
>> There is a to
Hi Andrea,
Am 13.04.20 um 17:26 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
>>
>> I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from
>> Subversion to Git.
>>
>> There is a to
On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from
Subversion to Git.
There is a tool for creating such a file:
https://projects.apache.org/create.html
The
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 11:21 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information
> >> In order to have some more context an addition like
> "
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 10:26 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Am 13.04.20 um 09:53 schrieb Ma
OpenOffice Project Information
Like every ASF projects we do have Project Informations:
https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
The data is taken from this file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content
/doap_openoffice.rdf
I would like to have it updated, esp
Am 13.04.20 um 10:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 13.04.20 um 10:12 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.04.20 um 23:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be
checked, if we can
Hi Marcus,
Am 13.04.20 um 10:12 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 12.04.20 um 23:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be
checked, if we can use the project summ
ache.org
>>> Subject: Apache OpenOffice Project Information
>>>
>>> Like every ASF projects we do have Project Informations:
>>>
>>> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
>>>
>>> The data is taken from this file:
>>>
&
Am 12.04.20 um 23:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus:
Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be
checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports.
this was also my idea. ;-)
@Matth
Am 13.04.20 um 09:31 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 8:38 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Apache OpenOffice Project Information
Like every ASF projects we do have Project
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 8:38 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Apache OpenOffice Project Information
>
> Hi all,
>
> Like every ASF projects we do have Proje
Hi Marcus,
Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be
>> checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports.
>
> this was also my idea. ;-)
>
> @Matthias:
> But why creating a
Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be
checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports.
this was also my idea. ;-)
@Matthias:
But why creating a new file? The existing one can be updated.
Marcus
Am 12.
yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be
checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports.
I am not volunteering. I am already on to many topics.
Am 12.04.20 um 20:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
Like every ASF projects we do have Project Informat
Hi all,
Like every ASF projects we do have Project Informations:
https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice
The data is taken from this file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository cha
Hello.
Usually the information about fixed security vulnerabilities was published on
https://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html
in few weeks after AOO new release. Or there just was mentioned that no fixes
were made this time.
Is it time to make this info pulic and update the
Does anybody know what vulnerabilities were fixed in OpenOffice 4.1.6? When the
appropriate information will be published?
--
Sergey
29.12.2018, 03:08, "Torokhov Sergey" :
> Hello.
>
> The page https://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html states that
>
>> Ope
sh the information about fixed CVE?
I'm interesting because in Gentoo the security team initially looked up the
OpenOffice before update the package in portage tree.
--
Sergey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice
e.apache.org<mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions?
Hi Jörg,
I can only speak for version 4.1.4 and 4.1.5, but those were built with
MS Visual C++ Compilers 2008 Standard Edition:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/b
g<mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions?
Hi Jörg,
I can only speak for version 4.1.4 and 4.1.5, but those were built with
MS Visual C++ Compilers 2008 Standard Edition:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.4/
/wntmsci/ReadMe.txt
No changes for AOO 4.1.6 planned.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 14.09.2018 um 09:33 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> Hello,
>
> Where can I get the information which (old) OOo/AOO versions were compiled
> against which concrete version of MS Visual Studio?
>
> The reason of
nk if backport to
4.1.6 is an option.
The current requirements you find on
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Building_on_Windows
Am 14. September 2018 09:33:35 MESZ schrieb "Jörg Schmidt"
:
>Hello,
>
>Where can I get the information which (ol
Hello,
Where can I get the information which (old) OOo/AOO versions were compiled
against which concrete version of MS Visual Studio?
The reason of my question is the current problems with Windows 10 and
KB4343909, for example reported in:
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f
On 4/27/18 12:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
>> On Apr 27, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the
>>> website from the Informatio
classes being gratis.
Licensing information, and cost would be useful additions, provided they
are accurate. (I don't expect an extension whose price is demarcated in
Euro's to have a dollar equivalent, or vice-versus.)
On second thoughts, listing the cost would have to be run past Apach
an-dictionary-thesaurus-hyphenation-patterns-20160210
I wonder if we can read the extention description and use that for the
extention page.
It could help to clarify the user before downloading which condition he is
expecting to agree to.
Plus we could maybe add search functionality based on li
user before downloading which condition he is
expecting to agree to.
Plus we could maybe add search functionality based on license information.
If you think the step further we could use all the information stored in an
extention to explain what the extention is about.
Am 27. April 2018 19:41:54
:
>Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the
>> website from the Information provided in the Extention itself.
>> In addition we store only rateings from users to the extention.
>>
>> Is thi
Hi -
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the website
>> from the Information provided in the Extention itself.
>> In addition we store only
Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the
website from the Information provided in the Extention itself.
In addition we store only rateings from users to the extention.
Is this a possible vision?
Where are the cave eats
Hi all,
I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the
website from the Information provided in the Extention itself.
In addition we store only rateings from users to the extention.
Is this a possible vision?
Where are the cave eats for this?
Thanks.
All the best
Peter
I disagree.
You have to make your point.
Not to object will only strengthen other position because your view remains
unheard.
The best weapon against haters is love and dignity.
Am 22. Mai 2017 18:32:39 MESZ schrieb esh1907 :
>The way to treat such people:
>1. Change our software license so
It's a very good point Peter. Diversity in the office software space is good.
And you're right; People aren't going to stop using AOO if the PMC decided to
stop releasing new versions. Please note to others I'm not some TDF/LO stooge.
I actually use MS Office for work and OnlyOffice for personal
The way to treat such people:
1. Change our software license so any code sharing between us and them
becomes impossible.
2. Arrange legally for the brand name they so desire to be forever
unavailable even if our project will be terminated in the future.
3. Ignore them.
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 7:52
The other offices are doing well. And competition is awesomely great.
You have forgotten to mention some competitors that also put some awesome
offers on the table.
I like the diversity this is causing.
I have joined in September last year and do not plan to swap project soon.
I joined the proj
I sometimes wonder if these people monitoring our mailing list don't
have a real life...
I know such zealots for almost 30 years now.
They do not understand that people are free to do what they want and to
use what they want.
Matthias
Am 21.05.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 20.05.2017 um 21
Am 20.05.2017 um 21:35 schrieb Meh:
Hey I saw the bugzilla thread and thought I'd share some info;
another attempt to tell a story that only specific people want to know.
How boring.
Marcus
--
Ciao
Marcus
-
To unsubscr
> From: Meh [mailto:espri...@yandex.ru]
> The only reason AOO still exists is a community of people who
> ideologically believe that GPL/LO is bad and unrestrictive
> licenses are great.
No, that is not correct.
Here at AOO are also people who do not agree with the TDF, which is not a
quest
Hey I saw the bugzilla thread and thought I'd share some info;
There have been 3 attempts by Apache and OpenOffice members in the past couple
years to do a dignified retirement before the code rot creates an unusable
state for AOO and it becomes an embarrassment for the FOSS community.
The mo
Most excellent. Thx!!
> On Sep 17, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> For those wanting to follow along or assist in the ASF hosted Buildbot
> builds, I created a
> new wiki page with some info about the builds and their hosts, how to update,
> trigger builds etc.
>
> h
Hi All,
For those wanting to follow along or assist in the ASF hosted Buildbot builds,
I created a
new wiki page with some info about the builds and their hosts, how to update,
trigger builds etc.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Buildbot+info
My work on migrating builds f
nt s to us. Althought donations are encourage.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Harkesh Yadav
wrote:
> Dear sir
> I am just confirm for the license of *Apache open office *It’s a free or
> chargeable software please provide the information
>
>
>
>
>
>
Dear sir
I am just confirm for the license of *Apache open office *It’s a free or
chargeable software please provide the information
*Thanks & Regards Harkesh *
* 9711087683*
>Where to find information about *.xcu schema (extension, dev, toolbar)
Use this extension: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_Packager
Easy to produce OXT
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
On 04/07/2016 07:55 AM, Christian Giehl wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on a custom toolbar for my oo-extension. To
create the visual appearance of the toolbar, I have to write an
Addons.xcu file, which contains a custom xml. However, the tag names
and attributes I found in the tutorial all
Hi,
I'm currently working on a custom toolbar for my oo-extension. To create
the visual appearance of the toolbar, I have to write an Addons.xcu
file, which contains a custom xml. However, the tag names and attributes
I found in the tutorial all across the www are not sufficient for my
case a
Forwarding Daniel's excellent message in case someone plans to attend
FOSDEM and is not on the dev@community list. I've updated
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2016 with the
information earlier discussed on this list. See you there!
Andrea
Forward
Hi Andrea, I didn't get the chance to read the memorial until now, I most
say is a great piece. However they omit a big part of his life which was
his professional one. As his linkedin page says (
https://uk.linkedin.com/pub/ian-lynch/0/a88/bb2) he was a Registered
Inspector of schools accredited b
On 13/09/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
Thank you. And it seems I mis-typed the year.in the memorial page. New
revision attached.
Thank you Kay. This final version is now published at
http://www.apache.org/memorials/
Regards,
Andrea.
-
Phillip Rhodes wrote:
All of the above said, maybe we should drop this whole discussion
Well, it remains the fact that "OpenOffice moribund" is false.
The primary sources cited in the article (all of which are clearly
misinterpreted) are:
- A message from Juergen saying that he won't be Relea
On 17/09/15 15:30, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> This is about Wikipedia being accurate, and the simple truth is,
Wikipedia is not about accuracy, nor is it about truth. What it is
about, is whether or not the delusions and hallucinations of the editors
can be supported by an appeal to an external
16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> > Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
>> > sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous
>> > information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved
s message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:25 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
> > sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:25 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
>> sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous
>> informati
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote:
> Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
> sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous
> information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved via an
> edit war. Don&#
ses attributed to Mr. Gerard and cites several cases where he
>>> was sanction for it. One can talk about his actions without
>>> slurring his person, especially when such acts are directly
>>> relevant to the topic of this thread.
>>>
>>
>> Last word,
hout slurring his
>> person, especially when such acts are directly relevant to the topic
>> of this thread.
>>
>
> Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
> sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous
> inform
the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous
information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved via an
edit war. Don't bring a knife to a gunfight. Any progress would
only be made by showing Mr. Gerard's o
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Time, gentlemen, time.
>
> We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go
> night-night.
>
> Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO
> business. We have our own busi
> On 16 Sep 15, at 15:38, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> Time, gentlemen, time.
>
> We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go
> night-night.
>
> Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO
> business. We have our own busin
Time, gentlemen, time.
We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go
night-night.
Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO
business. We have our own business to attend to. If folks want to keep
fussing about it, there are m
1 - 100 of 241 matches
Mail list logo
