>> >
>> I agree. The wiki did say they managed to open all of AOO in one
>Eclipse
>> project, but it took a lot of memory. I must try it some time.
>>
>
>You can open AOO in ONE Eclipse project but it does take a lot of
>physical
>memory. And you need to up the memory for your Java considerably
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Peter kovacs wrote:
>
> > Damian,
> >
> > I think you got me wrong.
> > I am not saying Eclipse is bad.
> > I say the wiki guide will configure eclipse to a basic level. Basic means
> > you can navigate t
Well, I like Google for its moon shot approach. So I tend to copy that
methodology.
I do have similar ambitious goals for Open Office. I am curious how far I get.
Hope I get a lot of support for the ideas, including more ideas. :-D
I am frightend at the same time. :P
>the project is seen as C
Hi all
Long time ago, most IDE faild with the size of the OO Code. I also know,
that XCode failed. But I think, Time has changed. We have more RAM now. In
NetBeans you have probably to extend the RAM in the JVM. I never tryed it.
but I think I will. It will be interesting for testing. And i
About 5 years ago, when I tried to used Netbeans to open a large C project
(the Wine project, about 2 million lines), it was unusably slow, and its
C/C++ indexer crashed.
I don't know if it has improved since then, but we have 6 times more code,
and it's C++, not the much simpler C. Eclipse invest
I use Visual Studio as a debug tool, and sometimes as an editor. I do my
builds in a Cygwin shell, following
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10
instructions.
I edit using either gvim or Visual Studio depending o
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Peter kovacs wrote:
> Damian,
>
> I think you got me wrong.
> I am not saying Eclipse is bad.
> I say the wiki guide will configure eclipse to a basic level. Basic means
> you can navigate through code. Build elements.
>
> Complete integration would include
> # ha
On 7/19/17, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> What is so "very basic" about Eclipse? It's an excellent IDE, among the
> best C++ IDEs I ever used, and the only IDE I use to develop AOO.
>
> I only used Visual Studio a little, and it seemed very good at the .NET
> languages, but poor at C++. What does Visu
Damian,
I think you got me wrong.
I am not saying Eclipse is bad.
I say the wiki guide will configure eclipse to a basic level. Basic means you
can navigate through code. Build elements.
Complete integration would include
# have all in one project, instead of each module separated.
# have all mo
I have extensively used visual studio for 5+ years as a pure C++ developers.
Even Eclipse is quite good and used it in my earlier android programming days
although I find eclipse slower than visual studio. But I think both of them are
excellent IDE and one can use any one of them.
Thanks
Kalya
What is so "very basic" about Eclipse? It's an excellent IDE, among the
best C++ IDEs I ever used, and the only IDE I use to develop AOO.
I only used Visual Studio a little, and it seemed very good at the .NET
languages, but poor at C++. What does Visual Studio do, that Eclipse CDT
doesn't?
Damja
There is no uniform answer, since one works as he like. I don't think we change
the policy.
However we have a guide for Eclipse on wiki. Which will give you a very basic
IDE support.
I would like to use intelliJ, but the IDE does not support java and C/C++ at
the same time. However a feature req
12 matches
Mail list logo
