Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-12 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Hagar Delest wrote: >> >> We should focus first on the forum maintenance, this was the initial >> target of this thread. >> Decorum can wait. The header has never been changed after the move to >> ASF servers so it's not a priority. > > > I

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Hagar Delest wrote: We should focus first on the forum maintenance, this was the initial target of this thread. Decorum can wait. The header has never been changed after the move to ASF servers so it's not a priority. It is still a change that should be done sooner or later, and the people inv

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:53:56 +0200 > janI wrote: > > > On 11 August 2013 10:49, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:41:47 +0200 > > > janI wrote: > > > > > > > On 11 August 2013 10:05, Larry Gusaas > wrote: > > > > >

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:53:56 +0200 janI wrote: > On 11 August 2013 10:49, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:41:47 +0200 > > janI wrote: > > > > > On 11 August 2013 10:05, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > > > > > > On 2013-08-11 1:27 AM janI wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 11 August 2013 00

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread Hagar Delest
+1. We should focus first on the forum maintenance, this was the initial target of this thread. Decorum can wait. The header has never been changed after the move to ASF servers so it's not a priority. Hagar Le 11/08/2013 10:49, Rory O'Farrell a écrit : On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:41:47 +0200 j

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread janI
On 11 August 2013 10:49, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:41:47 +0200 > janI wrote: > > > On 11 August 2013 10:05, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > > > > On 2013-08-11 1:27 AM janI wrote: > > > > > >> On 11 August 2013 00:40, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > >> > > >>> Shouldn't you discuss this o

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:41:47 +0200 janI wrote: > On 11 August 2013 10:05, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > > On 2013-08-11 1:27 AM janI wrote: > > > >> On 11 August 2013 00:40, Larry Gusaas wrote: > >> > >>> Shouldn't you discuss this on the forum to see what the forum users want? > >>> Previous change

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread janI
On 11 August 2013 10:05, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2013-08-11 1:27 AM janI wrote: > >> On 11 August 2013 00:40, Larry Gusaas wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't you discuss this on the forum to see what the forum users want? >>> Previous changes were discussed there, not imposed from outside the >>> forum. >

Re: FYI: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread Rory O'Farrell
Forum now nice and stable for past 24 hours or so (only lightly loaded at present - 85 users on en-Forum). -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2013-08-11 1:27 AM janI wrote: On 11 August 2013 00:40, Larry Gusaas wrote: Shouldn't you discuss this on the forum to see what the forum users want? Previous changes were discussed there, not imposed from outside the forum. I agree that is should be discussed on the forum, and now that is

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-11 Thread janI
On 11 August 2013 00:40, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2013-08-10 3:17 PM janI wrote: > >> On 10 August 2013 23:01, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >> I include one wit the Orb for the forum as well as the wiki: >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122998

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-10 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2013-08-10 3:17 PM janI wrote: On 10 August 2013 23:01, Alexandro Colorado wrote: I include one wit the Orb for the forum as well as the wiki: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122998 I didn't want to go with a monochrome since I think it makes it too plain to the light blues t

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-10 Thread janI
On 10 August 2013 23:01, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 3:29 PM, janI wrote: > > > On 10 August 2013 21:06, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > > > On 09/08/2013 Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > > >> > > >>> http://ima

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-10 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 3:29 PM, janI wrote: > On 10 August 2013 21:06, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > On 09/08/2013 Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > >> > >>> http://imagebin.org/267011 http://imagebin.org/267012 > > >>> Is it possibl

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-10 Thread janI
On 10 August 2013 21:06, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 09/08/2013 Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: >> >>> http://imagebin.org/267011 http://imagebin.org/267012 >>> Is it possible that you work on your own and don't communicate with >>> other

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-10 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 09/08/2013 Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: http://imagebin.org/267011 http://imagebin.org/267012​ Is it possible that you work on your own and don't communicate with others here on the list? This images are not known, not discussed, not approv

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-10 Thread janI
On 10 August 2013 14:34, Emanuele wrote: > janI wrote: > > MEMORY USAGE > > Max Memory Ever Allocated : 19.02 G > > Configured Max Per-thread Buffers : 27.46 G > > Configured Max Global Buffers : 640 M > > Configured Max Memory Limit : 28.09 G > > Physical Memory : 1.96 G > >

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-10 Thread Emanuele
janI wrote: > MEMORY USAGE >  Max Memory Ever Allocated : 19.02 G >  Configured Max Per-thread Buffers : 27.46 G >  Configured Max Global Buffers : 640 M >  Configured Max Memory Limit : 28.09 G >  Physical Memory : 1.96 G >  > --> Max memory limit exceeds 90% of physical memory,

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread janI
On 9 August 2013 22:07, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Juergen Schmidt >wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 9. August 2013 um 16:56 schrieb Alexandro Colorado: > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:47 AM, janI wrote: > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > As of the time of this mail, the

Re: FYI: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Rory O'Farrell
Gone again about 21:30 utc+1 Working good until then, about 3 sec response. -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > Am Freitag, 9. August 2013 um 16:56 schrieb Alexandro Colorado: > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:47 AM, janI wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope > > > with a higher load. > >

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Freitag, 9. August 2013 um 16:56 schrieb Alexandro Colorado: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:47 AM, janI wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope > > with a higher load. > > > > This is just a very limited reconfiguration (max_connections

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:47 AM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope > with a higher load. > > This is just a very limited reconfiguration (max_connections=75), and I > will over the next days do the following: > - include all changes in ba

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:33:51 +0200 janI wrote: > On 9 August 2013 15:06, FR web forum wrote: > > > >SLOW QUERIES > > > The slow query log is NOT enabled. > > > Current long_query_time = 10.00 sec. > > > You have 9115 out of 103343 that take longer than 10.00 sec. to > > >complete >

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread janI
On 9 August 2013 15:06, FR web forum wrote: > >SLOW QUERIES > > The slow query log is NOT enabled. > > Current long_query_time = 10.00 sec. > > You have 9115 out of 103343 that take longer than 10.00 sec. to > >complete > > --> not real bad, but also not super > Did you see if tab

Re: FYI: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread janI
On 9 August 2013 15:26, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:53:00 +0200 > janI wrote: > > > On 9 August 2013 13:43, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:40:25 +0100 > > > Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:16:15 +0200 > > > > janI wrote: > > >

FYI: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:53:00 +0200 janI wrote: > On 9 August 2013 13:43, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:40:25 +0100 > > Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:16:15 +0200 > > > janI wrote: > > > > > > > On 9 August 2013 11:05, FR web forum wrote: > > > > > >

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread FR web forum
>SLOW QUERIES > The slow query log is NOT enabled. > Current long_query_time = 10.00 sec. > You have 9115 out of 103343 that take longer than 10.00 sec. to >complete > --> not real bad, but also not super Did you see if tables are overhead Maybe you must optimize with a defragmenti

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread janI
On 9 August 2013 13:43, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:40:25 +0100 > Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:16:15 +0200 > > janI wrote: > > > > > On 9 August 2013 11:05, FR web forum wrote: > > > > > > > >As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:40:25 +0100 Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:16:15 +0200 > janI wrote: > > > On 9 August 2013 11:05, FR web forum wrote: > > > > > >As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope > > > >with a higher load. > > > No change for french

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:16:15 +0200 janI wrote: > On 9 August 2013 11:05, FR web forum wrote: > > > >As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope > > >with a higher load. > > No change for french forum, we still have error 1040. > > > > Apologies for my joke about snai

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread janI
On 9 August 2013 11:16, janI wrote: > > > > On 9 August 2013 11:05, FR web forum wrote: > >> >As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope >> >with a higher load. >> No change for french forum, we still have error 1040. >> > > Apologies for my joke about snails, the vm

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread janI
On 9 August 2013 11:05, FR web forum wrote: > >As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope > >with a higher load. > No change for french forum, we still have error 1040. > Apologies for my joke about snails, the vm is slower than a sleeping snail. All forums are hand

Re: Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread FR web forum
>As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope >with a higher load. No change for french forum, we still have error 1040. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional com

Forum vm reconfiguration.

2013-08-09 Thread janI
Hi. As of the time of this mail, the forum vm has been reconfigured to cope with a higher load. This is just a very limited reconfiguration (max_connections=75), and I will over the next days do the following: - include all changes in backup (today phpBB changes are not in svn/backup) - adjust ht