On 2/17/2017 4:52 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Joe wrote:
>> I've looked at the wiki. The documents there are all pretty old.
>> They may be ok, but they were written for older versions of the software.
>
> Your real starting point is here:
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserG
Joe wrote:
I've looked at the wiki. The documents there are all pretty old.
They may be ok, but they were written for older versions of the software.
Your real starting point is here:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide
This is for the current (4.1.x) version and is being
om: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
>>
>>> I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
>>> writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The
>>> doc@ list
>>> seems to be dead, except for one message posted this
On 02/15/2017 06:07 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>From this perspective I'd start with an FAQ.
This is where it would be great if Solr, in conjunction with some of the
other technologies that are being developed by The Apache Software
Foundation could crawl through the various mailing lists, forums, e
On 2/15/2017 12:43 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
>
>> [knmc]
>> I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box
>> page above, it
>> appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors
>> Group and as such would m
I learned on Fosdem from the pro documenters to stick to
# use case oriented approach. ALWAYS.
# never start with index
# set the possibility to provide feedback as low as possible.
# and only describe how it is done
# don't use insiders.
>From this perspective I'd start with an FAQ. And then cont
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> [knmc]
> I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box
> page above, it
> appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors
> Group and as such would most likely be under the CC-BY license.
> [/knmc]
Y
On 2/15/2017 9:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
>>
>>> I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
>>> writing
already made 2 commits but there is
definitely more to do:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1783028
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1783109
Kind regards, Matthias
Am 15.02.2017 um 00:27 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> I'm sure our document
Hi all
Am .02.2017, 15:20 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan :
On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. Th
On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The
doc@ list
seems to be dead, except for one message posted this
Hello,
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
> writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The
> doc@ list
> seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year.
>
>
I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The doc@ list
seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year.
What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or
document
13 matches
Mail list logo
