Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: > On 9 June 2013 22:18, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: >>> As I said, let's not worry about the certification thing. I doubt it >>> is really worth the effort developing a formal certification program >>> for s

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Ian Lynch
On 9 June 2013 22:18, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: >> As I said, let's not worry about the certification thing. I doubt it >> is really worth the effort developing a formal certification program >> for so few. It really has to be thousands of possible candida

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: > As I said, let's not worry about the certification thing. I doubt it > is really worth the effort developing a formal certification program > for so few. It really has to be thousands of possible candidates to > make these things work and end user

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Ian Lynch
As I said, let's not worry about the certification thing. I doubt it is really worth the effort developing a formal certification program for so few. It really has to be thousands of possible candidates to make these things work and end users would be the only way of getting those numbers. It is on

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: > > On 9 June 2013 20:35, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > >>> > >>> On Jun 9, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: > >>> > My main thought was marke

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: > On 9 June 2013 20:35, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 9, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: >>> My main thought was market confidence. If LO can say they have 26 developers working o

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Ian Lynch
On 9 June 2013 20:35, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Jun 9, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: >> >>> My main thought was market confidence. If LO can say they have 26 >>> developers working on code it would be interesting to have a >>> comparison on

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On 6/9/13, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Jun 9, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: >> >>> My main thought was market confidence. If LO can say they have 26 >>> developers working on code it would be interesting to have a >>> comparison on a similar

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: > >> My main thought was market confidence. If LO can say they have 26 >> developers working on code it would be interesting to have a >> comparison on a similar "like for like" basis. > > Before we

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Sonntag, 9. Juni 2013 um 16:34 schrieb Rob Weir: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: > > I noticed that LibreO has 26 Certified Developers. > > > > http://www.documentfoundation.org/certification/developers/ > > > > While we have the concept of a committer here at AOO is th

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jun 9, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: > My main thought was market confidence. If LO can say they have 26 > developers working on code it would be interesting to have a > comparison on a similar "like for like" basis. Before we can make a like for like comparison we need to understand the

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Ian Lynch
My main thought was market confidence. If LO can say they have 26 developers working on code it would be interesting to have a comparison on a similar "like for like" basis. On 9 June 2013 17:24, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2013, at 7:36 AM, janI wrote: > >> On 9 June 2013 16:04, Ian Lynch

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jun 9, 2013, at 7:36 AM, janI wrote: > On 9 June 2013 16:04, Ian Lynch wrote: > >> I noticed that LibreO has 26 Certified Developers. >> >> http://www.documentfoundation.org/certification/developers/ >> >> While we have the concept of a committer here at AOO is there >> something specific

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread janI
On 9 June 2013 16:04, Ian Lynch wrote: > I noticed that LibreO has 26 Certified Developers. > > http://www.documentfoundation.org/certification/developers/ > > While we have the concept of a committer here at AOO is there > something specific for active code developers? Would it be worth > consid

Re: Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: > I noticed that LibreO has 26 Certified Developers. > > http://www.documentfoundation.org/certification/developers/ > > While we have the concept of a committer here at AOO is there > something specific for active code developers? Would it be wort

Certified DEVs

2013-06-09 Thread Ian Lynch
I noticed that LibreO has 26 Certified Developers. http://www.documentfoundation.org/certification/developers/ While we have the concept of a committer here at AOO is there something specific for active code developers? Would it be worth considering such a thing? -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qu