Am 03/31/2016 07:40 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
OK, as there were no further comments and no real disagree I'll create a
new RESOLVED - NOCODEFIX resolution status. This status should be set
when an issue was solved with no change in the source code (e.g., user
requests or how-to
Marcus wrote:
OK, as there were no further comments and no real disagree I'll create a
new RESOLVED - NOCODEFIX resolution status. This status should be set
when an issue was solved with no change in the source code (e.g., user
requests or how-to questions).
What's the maximum length? Maybe FIX
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Marcus wrote:
> [Top-Posting]
>
> OK, as there were no further comments and no real disagree I'll create a
> new RESOLVED - NOCODEFIX resolution status. This status should be set when
> an issue was solved with no change in the source code (e.g., user requests
> o
[Top-Posting]
OK, as there were no further comments and no real disagree I'll create a
new RESOLVED - NOCODEFIX resolution status. This status should be set
when an issue was solved with no change in the source code (e.g., user
requests or how-to questions).
For every fix that touches the so
Am 03/26/2016 10:50 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the
result of bringing more confusion! So:
I don't see why this brings more confusion. It's the opposite, one
sta
Marcus wrote:
Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the
result of bringing more confusion! So:
I don't see why this brings more confusion. It's the opposite, one
status for "resolved with a code fix" and the other f
Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 25/03/2016 Marcus wrote:
Within this thread the agreemnt seems to be to use RESOLVED - MANAGED or
RESOLVED - DONE. In the meantime I tent to RESOLVED - DONE.
If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals I've seen have the
result of
On 25/03/2016 Marcus wrote:
We want to use a different resolution status to underline that the
respective issue *and* its solution has nothing to do with the code. And
that's the topic of this mail thread.
And this is clear to me, but I totally don't get why one needs to do
that, except for au
Am 03/25/2016 08:58 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 22/03/2016 Marcus wrote:
@all:
It seems we could have a consensus in creating a new MANAGED or DONE
status to set when issues are no real code problems, but more
user-oriented. Finally, they were solved for the user's satisfaction
(e.g., provid
On 22/03/2016 Marcus wrote:
@all:
It seems we could have a consensus in creating a new MANAGED or DONE
status to set when issues are no real code problems, but more
user-oriented. Finally, they were solved for the user's satisfaction
(e.g., provided how-to's or repaired documents, etc.). However,
Am 03/23/2016 12:29 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:30
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
Am 03/22/2016 06:34 P
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:30
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
> Am 03/22/2016 06:34 PM, schrieb Patricia Sha
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target
Milestone field
On 03/22/2016 05:02 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus:
[ ,,, ]
[ ... ] what about RESOLVED -
MANAGED?
This word is maybe better known in the world. This term
shows that
the
issu
;> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target
>>> Milestone field
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2016 05:02 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>>> Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus:
>> [ ,,, ]
>>>>>
Am 03/22/2016 06:34 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 3/22/2016 9:25 AM, Marcus wrote:
...
OK, it seems you also like the idea to have another resolution status -
it just depends on what the name is, right? ;-)
...
How about RESOLVED - WENEEDPEOPLE for issues where we would like to do a
fix or
On 3/22/2016 9:25 AM, Marcus wrote:
...
OK, it seems you also like the idea to have another resolution status -
it just depends on what the name is, right? ;-)
...
How about RESOLVED - WENEEDPEOPLE for issues where we would like to do a
fix or enhancement, and are only being prevented by lack
Am 03/22/2016 04:48 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Many interesting ideas, ...
-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 03:35
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone
Am 03/22/2016 11:56 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino:
It seems to me that RESOLVED - RESOLVED is too mysterious and RESOLVED
- NOTOURBUG is not much better than NOTANISSUE.
RESOLVED - HANDLED might be closer, with the comment that achieves
this explains how it is handled. (I.e., documentation, workaround
Many interesting ideas, ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 03:35
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
> On 03/22/2016
the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
It's not about to draw the line between issues that are resolved and
verified solutions. It's about to differentiate issues that are in
the
real
application and therefore need to be fixed in the source code.
Here we
use
(
On 03/21/2016 10:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 15:30
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
[ ... ]
I have been
Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 03/22/2016 03:37 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53
To: q...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target
Am 03/22/2016 03:37 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53
To: q...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
It's not about t
Am 03/22/2016 12:52 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino:
It's not about to draw the line between issues that are resolved and
verified solutions. It's about to differentiate issues that are in the real
application and therefore need to be fixed in the source code. Here we use
(or better should use) RESOLVED -
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 15:30
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
[ ... ]
>
>
> I have been guilty
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/21/2016 10:36 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>> [top posting]
>>
>> Thanks for all the help with this and for the new NONE for
>> target release. Hopefully, it will be used sparingly
>> assuming we us e RESOLVED-FIXED as only for issues in which
Am 03/22/2016 12:30 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 03/21/2016 10:36 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
[top posting]
Thanks for all the help with this and for the new NONE for
target release. Hopefully, it will be used sparingly
assuming we us e RESOLVED-FIX
to:p...@acm.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016
09:10 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we
add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
On 3/21/2016 8:59 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
I want to clarify this.
I think
On 03/21/2016 03:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 10:22
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
Kay Sc
:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From: Patricia Shanahan
>> [mailto:p...@acm.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016
>> 09:10 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we
>> add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>>
>> On 3/21/2016 8:
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 10:22
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
> Kay Schenk wrote:
[ ... ]
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 09:10
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
> On 3/21/2016 8:59 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
&
o use Resolved-Not An Issue to close purely support issues.
Keith
>
>>
>> In those cases, it is preferable to change the resolution.
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 20
Am 03/21/2016 05:10 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 3/21/2016 8:59 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
I want to clarify this.
I think the problem might be that "Resolved - Fixed" is being used
incorrectly. As far as I know, there are many case
more poeople that could
help with tips and action.
But I also know it's difficult to enfource this way. ;-)
Marcus
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 14:09
To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
On 3/21/2016 8:59 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
I want to clarify this.
I think the problem might be that "Resolved - Fixed" is being used
incorrectly. As far as I know, there are many cases where this resolution
is used where one of "Resolv
nal Message-
> > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 14:09
> > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
> >
&
Thanks for the "None" Target, Marcus.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 15:38
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to
nday, March 20, 2016 14:09
> To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
> Kay Schenk wrote:
> > We seem to have a number of issues in BZ that are now listed
> > as Resolved/Fixed but
Am 03/20/2016 09:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
We seem to have a number of issues in BZ that are now listed
as Resolved/Fixed but don't seem to pertain to an actual
upcoming release.
Examples:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126652
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126828
Can we
Kay Schenk wrote:
We seem to have a number of issues in BZ that are now listed
as Resolved/Fixed but don't seem to pertain to an actual
upcoming release.
Everything that was marked RESOLVED FIXED will be in 4.2.0. So 4.2.0 is
a perfectly valid value for these cases.
Just to be clear: 4.1.2 w
To our BZ admins.
We seem to have a number of issues in BZ that are now listed
as Resolved/Fixed but don't seem to pertain to an actual
upcoming release.
Examples:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126652
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126828
Can we add something like "N/A" or
42 matches
Mail list logo
