On 30.01.2014 23:10, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
I would like to report some observations that I made when thinking about how
to make building OpenOffice with one global makefile feasible. It will
probably the last of build related mails in the near fu
On 30 January 2014 23:10, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> > I would like to report some observations that I made when thinking about
> how
> > to make building OpenOffice with one global makefile feasible. It will
> > probably the last of build related
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> I would like to report some observations that I made when thinking about how
> to make building OpenOffice with one global makefile feasible. It will
> probably the last of build related mails in the near future.
>
> Traditional make uses a
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:54 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 29 January 2014 10:18, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
> > I would like to report some observations that I made when thinking about
> > how to make building OpenOffice with one global makefile feasible. It
> will
> > probably the last of build related m
On 29 January 2014 10:18, Andre Fischer wrote:
> I would like to report some observations that I made when thinking about
> how to make building OpenOffice with one global makefile feasible. It will
> probably the last of build related mails in the near future.
>
> Traditional make uses a top-do
I would like to report some observations that I made when thinking about
how to make building OpenOffice with one global makefile feasible. It
will probably the last of build related mails in the near future.
Traditional make uses a top-down approach. It starts with a target,
'all' by defaul
