2013/6/25 Andrea Pescetti
> On 17/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> If you consider all of that, one way of approaching it might be:
>>
>> 1. Use the official blog for items that give a PMC perspective.
>>
>> 2. Use external blogs for "committer perspective" items, but aggregate
>> them into Planet O
On 6/25/13 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
> On 25 June 2013 09:13, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> On 17/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> If you consider all of that, one way of approaching it might be:
>>>
>>> 1. Use the official blog for items that give a PMC perspective.
>>>
>>> 2. Use external blogs for "co
On 25 June 2013 09:13, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 17/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> If you consider all of that, one way of approaching it might be:
>>
>> 1. Use the official blog for items that give a PMC perspective.
>>
>> 2. Use external blogs for "committer perspective" items, but aggregate
>
On 17/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
If you consider all of that, one way of approaching it might be:
1. Use the official blog for items that give a PMC perspective.
2. Use external blogs for "committer perspective" items, but aggregate
them into Planet OpenOffice, if we can set that up.
In the med
Am 06/14/2013 09:17 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 13.06.2013 23:58, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 06/13/2013 01:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 14/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> If we agree on this kind of division, then "news" or "announcements"
>> would refer to project blog posts of a certain style. They are the
>> more formal ones written with the intent of giving a specific
On 14/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
If we agree on this kind of division, then "news" or "announcements"
would refer to project blog posts of a certain style. They are the
more formal ones written with the intent of giving a specific message.
For the time being I've just committed the "minimal" vers
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 14.06.2013 14:27, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 06/13/2013 09:36 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>>
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50
On 14.06.2013 14:27, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 06/13/2013 09:36 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/201
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/13/2013 09:36 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>
>> On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>>> wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 12/06/2013 Andr
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
.
.
.
>
>
> You may want to read that particular disclaimer before suggesting to use it
> in other mails :-)
>
> -Andre
>
That's the point. Everyone likes the idea of having disclaimers, but
few people read them. It less about being useful t
On 13.06.2013 23:58, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 06/13/2013 01:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Andre Fischer
wrote:
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/201
Am 06/13/2013 01:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
Can we have both?
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/13/2013 09:36 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>
> On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/2013 Andre
Am 06/13/2013 09:36 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
Can we have both? Some longer living, semi-'official' news and a more
On 13.06.2013 13:48, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
Can we have both? Some l
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>>
On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
>
> Can we have both? Some longer
On 12.06.2013 22:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
Can we have both? Some longer living, semi-'official' news and a more
frequently changing list of recent blog posts. I
On 6/12/13 6:48 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
>> Can we have both? Some longer living, semi-'official' news and a more
>> frequently changing list of recent blog posts. I find both important
>> and interesting. And having blog posts listed on the main page may b
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>
>> On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we have both? Some longer living, semi-'official' news and a more
>>> frequently changing list of recent blog posts. I find both important
>>>
Am 06/12/2013 06:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
Can we have both? Some longer living, semi-'official' news and a more
frequently changing list of recent blog posts. I find both important
and interesting. And having blog posts listed on the main page may be
an
On 12/06/2013 Andre Fischer wrote:
Can we have both? Some longer living, semi-'official' news and a more
frequently changing list of recent blog posts. I find both important
and interesting. And having blog posts listed on the main page may be
an incentive to more people writing new posts.
A
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> We don't, but I do track a list of the most-common misconceptions that I read
By pure chance I read this quote today, which I think fits perfectly
(I hope it's historically correct)
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a c
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 11.06.2013 17:45, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>
I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>>
>> I think just ignore it. Why help promote El Reg?
>>
>> Look at the numbers:
>
>
>
> You're right that devs shouldn't lose any sleep over what a news site says.
>
> However as someo
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> completely the now open
Sorry the above line should be "completely IGNORED Netrexx"
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary
act
- George Orwell
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> I think just ignore it. Why help promote El Reg?
>
> Look at the numbers:
You're right that devs shouldn't lose any sleep over what a news site says.
However as someone who has been on the other side of the counter and knows
how the relat
On 12.06.2013 01:23, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kay Schenk
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
RGB ES wrote:
2013/6/11 Rob Weir
On T
On 11.06.2013 17:45, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship no
OpenOffice before its time'"
It is sad that it has the usual misinfo
On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kay Schenk
>>> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 20
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kay Schenk
>> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti > >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
Hi,
Am 11.06.2013 18:49, schrieb Rob Weir:
Put a new entry there for "News" or "Blog" and have that link to the blog.
+1 (perhaps even News and Blog)
--
Grüße
Günter Marxen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openof
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kay Schenk
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti >wrote:
> >>
> >>> RGB ES wrote:
> >>>
> 2013/6/11 Rob Weir
>
> > O
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> RGB ES wrote:
>>>
2013/6/11 Rob Weir
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> On T
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> RGB ES wrote:
>>
>>> 2013/6/11 Rob Weir
>>>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
>>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> RGB ES wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/11 Rob Weir
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> It is sad that it has the usual misinformation:
>
> I w
RGB ES wrote:
2013/6/11 Rob Weir
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
It is sad that it has the usual misinformation:
I was quite surprised to read it. At least, if a journalist had to pick
a recent blog post from the
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:58:54 +0200
RGB ES wrote:
> 2013/6/11 Rob Weir
>
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship
> > no
2013/6/11 Rob Weir
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer
> wrote:
> >
> >> I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship
> no
> >> OpenOffice before its time'"
> >>
> >> It is sad that it has the
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
>> I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship no
>> OpenOffice before its time'"
>>
>> It is sad that it has the usual misinformation:
>>
>
> You should
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship no
> OpenOffice before its time'"
>
> It is sad that it has the usual misinformation:
>
You should find the email of the publication's news editor and write a
polite ye
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship no
> OpenOffice before its time'"
>
> It is sad that it has the usual misinformation:
>
> - "... most of the original OpenOffice developers had alrea
Hello everybody,
I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship
no OpenOffice before its time'"
It is sad that it has the usual misinformation:
- "... most of the original OpenOffice developers had already jumped
ship to the rival LibreOffice fork,..."
when in re
44 matches
Mail list logo
