Well, it is easier to get funding for such things if both projects get benefits.
Depending on the organizers, if things only go to one side now it is likely
that such funding will not be available in the future or that it will be
reduced considerably and then everyone loses.
Pedro.
>___
LOl - well, I wouldn't make too much of the paid development part, Jurgen,
it is what you do also, paid developement work for this project.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you're interested into including the changes into AOO then all parties
> involved are li
Hi,
if you're interested into including the changes into AOO then all
parties involved are listed here (incl. email addresses):
http://www.digitale-nachhaltigkeit.ch/2012/07/suse-und-lanedo-setzen-ooxml-verbesserungen-in-libreofficeopenoffice-org-fur-behorden-um/
Am 03.01.2013 10:22, schrieb
ady be in the hands of the Open Source Business
>>>> Alliance. Those should be available to anyone. This is probably a good
>>>> place to watch for them (auf Deutsch):
>>>> <http://www.osb-alliance.de/working-groups/office-interoperability/>.
>&g
se should be available to anyone. This is probably a good
> >> place to watch for them (auf Deutsch):
> >> <http://www.osb-alliance.de/working-groups/office-interoperability/>.
> >>
> >> - Dennis
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >
ing-groups/office-interoperability/>.
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 16:16
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: User initiative for improving
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:00 PM, F C. Costero
> wrote:
> > I did a little summary of the questions posted so far on Google. The
> > attached file shows:
>
> Thanks for the summary. I was hoping we could collect questions for
> the remainder o
ce-interoperability/>.
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 16:16
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: User initiative for improving OOXML (was Re: AOO questions on
> Google)
itiative for improving OOXML (was Re: AOO questions on Google)
Hello;
The ASF is a non-profit organization, we don't pay for coding but
concerning docx support there was a talk from Matthias Stürmer
in ApacheConEU:
http://www.apachecon.eu/schedule/presentation/46/
This effort, of cou
lts before engaging in
future investments of this kind.
Pedro.
>
> Da: Andrew Pitonyak
>A: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Inviato: Domenica 23 Dicembre 2012 14:46
>Oggetto: Re: AOO questions on Google
>
>No save as for docx is why libre i
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:00 PM, F C. Costero wrote:
> I did a little summary of the questions posted so far on Google. The
> attached file shows:
Thanks for the summary. I was hoping we could collect questions for
the remainder of the month and then pick the top questions to answer
in a blog p
ich interchangeable formats are used.
> >
> > - Dennis
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: janI [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 02:37
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: AOO questions on Google
> >
mats is a detractor from Apache
> > OpenOffice 3.4. There are the usual interchange fidelity issues as well,
> > depending on which interchangeable formats are used.
> >
> > - Dennis
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: janI [mailto:j...@apache.org]
There are the usual interchange fidelity issues as well,
> depending on which interchangeable formats are used.
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: janI [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 02:37
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject:
Message-
From: janI [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 02:37
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: AOO questions on Google
Thanks for the summary !
Personally I asumed that LO would be #1, but I am amazed about #2 (MS
Office interoperability and Other formats) I
Thanks for the summary !
Personally I asumed that LO would be #1, but I am amazed about #2 (MS
Office interoperability and Other formats) I thought that was one of our
very strong sides. I might be worthwhile to look a bit deeper into that,
and see if the cause for the questions is in lack of fea
16 matches
Mail list logo
